Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of cytoplasmic and vacuolar pH in higher plant cells by 31P NMR

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

It has recently been emphasised that the intracellular pH of plant cells must be actively regulated to offset acid–base imbalances that occur during metabolism and solute uptake (for review see ref. 1). Changes in cytoplasmic pH might be important (1) in controlling various aspects of metabolism2, including enzyme activities responsible for malate synthesis during cation accumulation1,2, (2) in polar transport of the plant hormone, auxin3, and (3) in intracellular responses to substances such as auxin and the phytotoxin fusicoccin, which cause proton extrusion1,4,5. Almost no direct measurements of cytoplasmic pH have been made on the small cells typical of higher plants1. The task is hampered by the presence of a generally acidic vacuole which occupies much of the cell volume. Use of the indirect method of 14C-5, 5-dimethyloxazolidine-2, 4-dione (DMO) distribution is subject to considerable uncertainties because of corrections needed for vacuolar pH and volume, and DMO metabolism6,7. Here we report the use of 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to estimate the pH of vacuole and cytoplasm in maize root tips.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith, F. A. & Raven, J. A. A. Rev. Pl. Physiol. 30, 289–311 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Davies, D. D. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 27, 513–529 (1973); A. Rev. Pl. Physiol. 30, 131–158 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rubery, P. H. Planta 144, 173–178 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rayle, D. L. & Cleland, R. E. Curr. Topics dev. Biol. 11, 187–214 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marrè, E. A. Rev. Pl. Physiol. 30, 273–288 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurkdjian, A. & Guern, J. Pl. Sci. Lett. 11, 337–344 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kurkdjian, A., Leguay, J. J. & Guern, J. Resp. Physiol. 33, 70–89 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moon, R. B. & Richards, J. H. J. biol. Chem. 248, 7276–7278 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burt, C. T., Cohen, S. M. & Barany, M. A. Rev. Biophys. Bioengng. 8, 1–25 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Effer, W. R. & Ranson, S. L. Pl. Physiol. 42, 1053–1058 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Givan, C. V. Pl. Physiol. 43, 948–952 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdul-Baki, A. A. & Ray, P. M. Pl. Physiol. 47, 537–544 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Loughman, B. C. in Perspectives in Experimental Biology Vol. 2 (ed Sunderland, N). 423–431 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bergmeyer, H. U. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis (Academic, New York, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  15. McComb, R. B. & Yushok, W. D. Cancer Res. 24 part 1, 193–197 (1964).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Biely, P. & Bauer, S. Biochim. biophys. Acta. 121, 213–214 (1966); Colin. Czech. Chem. Commun. Engl. Edn. 32, 1588–1594 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, J., Ray, P., Wade-Jardetzky, N. et al. Estimation of cytoplasmic and vacuolar pH in higher plant cells by 31P NMR. Nature 283, 870–872 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/283870a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/283870a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation