Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of brood hosts on host preferences of bark beetle parasites

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

The southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman (SPB) is attacked by several species of hymenopterous parasites1,2 the most common of which also parasitise other bark beetles3–5 including the engraver beetles Ips grandicollis (Eichhoif), I. avulsus (Eichhoff), I. calligraphus (Germar), I. pini (Say); and the eastern juniper bark beetle, Phloeosinus dentatus (Say). The increasing importance of pest management has focused attention on the role of their natural enemies. However, the dynamics of bark beetle parasite populations is not generally known beyond estimates of mortality caused by parasites. The hymenopteran parasite guild of D. frontalis may kill up to 30% of a given brood2. Since D. frontalis is cyclic in most areas with epidemics followed by very low population densities1, other beetle hosts probably act as reservoirs for certain species of these parasites3. Conversely, during D. frontalis epidemics, other beetles, such as I. grandicollis and P. dentatus may compete as alternate hosts. Information on preferences for D. frontalis and other associated bark beetles is necessary to understand the interactions of this host–parasite complex. We report here the results of a study designed to determine if several known D. frontalis parasites display any host preferences among D. frontalis, I. grandicollis or P. dentatus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thatcher, R. C. US Forest Sen, South. Forest Exp. Stn. Occasional Paper 180, (1960).

  2. Moore, G. E. Environ. Entomol. 1, 58–65 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berisford, C. W. Environ. Entomol. 3, 695–6 (1974).

  4. Berisford, C. W. Can. Entomol. 106, 869–72 (1974).

  5. Berisford, C. W., Kulman, H. M. & Pienkowski, R. L. Can. Entomol. 102, 484–90 (1970).

  6. Camors, F. B. & Payne, T. L. Ann. entomol. Soc. Am. 65, 31–33 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Matthews, R. W. Contrib. Am. entomol. Inst. 40, 1–86 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berisford, C. W. & Franklin, R. T. J. Ga. entomol. Soc. 4, 93–96 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peck, O. Can. entomol. Suppl. 30, (1963).

  10. Muesebeck, C. F. et al. USDA Agr. Monogr. 2, (1951).

  11. Berisford, C. W. & Franklin, R. T. J. Ga. entomol. Soc. 7, 110–15 (1972).

  12. Hopkins, A. D. USDA Program of Work, 353, (1917).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Craighead, F. C. J. agric. Res. 22, 189–220 (1921).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thorpe, W. H. & Jones, F. G. W. Proc. R. Soc. B124, 56–81 (1937).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Richmond, H. A. For. Chron. 9, 60–61 (1933).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wood, D. L. Univ. Calif. Pub. Entomol. 27, 241–282 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thorpe, W. H. Proc. R. Soc. B126, 370–397 (1938).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cornell, H. & Pimentel, D. Ecology 59(2), 297–308 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kudon, L., Berisford, C. Influence of brood hosts on host preferences of bark beetle parasites. Nature 283, 288–290 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/283288a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/283288a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation