Skip to main content
Log in

Peculiarities of binary galaxies

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

A recent analysis of a sample of close binary galaxies1 by White and Valdes2 has revealed some peculiar features: in particular, they tend to be brighter than field galaxies. Binary galaxies are important because the relative simplicity of the two-body problem in dynamics should make it possible to obtain good estimates of the masses of paired galaxies. This would help in determining whether there are massive haloes of dark, unseen matter, and in the problem area of galaxy formation. Much effort has therefore been expended (ref. 3 and refs therein), but conclusions about the existence of massive haloes and about the mass-to-light ratios have varied. Because we do not have complete information, various statistical assumptions must be made in these analyses. Detailed arguments2 suggest that one of these assumptions has been in error in previous work. We present a test which supports this claim. (The sample used here and in ref. 2 seems to be the only set of paired galaxies with quantitative selection criteria and velocity information for an unbiased subsample.) Furthermore, it was shown2 that binary galaxies are drawn from a luminosity function which has a characteristic luminosity brighter than that for field galaxies by almost one whole magnitude. We discuss one of the possible explanations and some suggestive evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Turner, E. L. Astrophys. J. 208, 20 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. White, S. D. M. & Valdes, F. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. (in the press).

  3. Turner, E. L. Astrophys. J. 208, 304 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Peterson, S. D. thesis, Cornell Univ. (1978).

  5. Noerdlinger, P. D. Astrophys. J. 229, 877 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmidt, M. Astrophys. J. 151, 393 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. White, S. D. M. & Sharp, N. A. Nature 269, 395 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharp, N. A., Lin, D. N. C. & White, S. D. M. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 187, 287 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Larson, R. B. & Tinsley, B. M. Astrophys. J. 219, 46 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Holmberg, E. Medd Lund. Astr. Obs. Ser II, No. 136 (1958).

  11. White, S. D. M. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 184, 185 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gott, J. R. III & Turner, E. L. Astrophys. J. Lett. 232, L79 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharp, N., Jones, B. Peculiarities of binary galaxies. Nature 283, 275–277 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/283275a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/283275a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation