Skip to main content
Log in

Phototransduction in the fly compound eye exhibits temporal resonances and a pure time delay

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Photoreceptor cells in both vertebrates and invertebrates respond to a flash of light with a slow graded change in membrane potential, which is generally depolarising in invertebrates and hyperpolarising in vertebrates. Although some of the early photochemical and biochemical stages of the transduction process have been elucidated in both cases1,2, these reactions are fast compared with the time course of the electrical response, which is typically hundreds of milliseconds long. To explain this slow response in the eye of Limulus, Fuortes and Hodgkin3 proposed a mechanism in which the light signal passes through a cascade of simple low pass filters. The model was later defined more specifically in terms of a chain of chemical reactions linked together through products and reactants4, and has been used with small modifications and different numbers of stages to account for the behavior of various vertebrate and invertebrate photoreceptors including the fly compound eye5,6. I have now obtained evidence that phototransduction in the fly in small signal conditions involves underdamped resonance behaviour and a significant pure time delay, neither of which can be accounted for by the conventional cascade model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hausen, K. in Function and Formation of Neural Systems (ed. Stent, G. S.) 81–110 (Dahlem Konferenzen, Berlin, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kropf, A. in Vertebrate Photoreception (eds Barlow, H. B. & Fatt, P.) 15–28 (Academic, London, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fuortes, M. G. F. & Hodgkin, A. L. J. Physiol., Lond. 172, 239–263 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Borsellino, A., Fuortes, M. G. F. & Smith, T. G. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 30, 429–443 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baylor, D. A., Hodgkin, A. L. & Lamb, T. D. J. Physiol., Lond. 242, 685–727 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. French, A. S. & Järvilehto, M. J. Physiol., Lond. 274, 311–322 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. French, A. S. & Järvilehto, M. J. comp. Physiol. 126, 87–96 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. French, A. S. I.E.E.E. Trans. biomed. Engng (in the press).

  9. French, A. S. Biol. Cybernetics 32, 115–123 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D'Azzo, J. J. & Houpis, C. H. Feedback Control System Analysis and Synthesis (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Bendat, J. S. & Piersol, A. G. Measurement and Analysis of Random Data (Wiley, New York, 1968).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

French, A. Phototransduction in the fly compound eye exhibits temporal resonances and a pure time delay. Nature 283, 200–202 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/283200a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/283200a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation