Skip to main content
Log in

Bimodal distributions of seedling weight in relation to density of Festuca paradoxa Desv.

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE degree to which plants growing together interfere with one another by competing for resources such as light, moisture and nutrients is difficult to determine by direct measurement of resource depletion1. Plant ecologists have therefore looked for indicators of interference in population structure2,3. One proposed measure of interference is the shift that occurs from the ‘normal’ distribution of seed weight to a ‘log-norma’ distribution of the weight of seedlings grown from those seeds in an even-aged monoculture. This shift presumably reflects the emergence of a few large and dominant individuals and the suppression of larger numbers of small individuals. Recently Ford4 and Newbould5 have proposed that distributions of plant weight in competing populations are actually bimodal, resulting from the presence of distinct populations of large individuals with positive relative growth rates and small individuals with nearly zero growth rates. Even-aged plantations of Picea sitchensis demonstrate such disjunct growth rates, and mortality is confined to the smaller individuals4. Size distributions in naturally thinning populations of Abies balsamea and Prunus pensylvanica are also bimodal6. We have studied the distribution of seedling weight in even-aged stands of Festuca paradoxa, a native North American prairie grass7, and report here that although the distribution is bimodal, the bimodality is more striking at lower densities, where interference is less severe. This result is the reverse of that expected if the extent of bimodality were a direct indication of the magnitude of interference. Therefore, although bimodality may be an eventual outcome of interference, it cannot be used as a measure of the strength of interaction between individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harper, J. L. Population Biology of Plants (Academic, London, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koyama, H. & Kira, T. J. Inst. Polytech. Osaka City Univ. D 7, 73–94 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harper, J. L. J. Ecol. 55, 247–270 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ford, E. D. J. Ecol. 63, 311–333 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ford, E. D. & Newbould, P. J. J. Ecol. 58, 275–296 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mohler, C. L., Marks, P. L. & Sprugel, D.G. J. Ecol. 66, 599–614 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weaver, J. E. North American Prairie (Johnsen, Lincoln, Nebraska, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, J. E. Biometry (Freeman, San Francisco, 1969).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. Statistical Methods, 6th edn (Iowa State University, Ames, 1967).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gottlieb, L. D. J. Ecol. 65, 127–134 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Black, J. N. Aust. J. agric. Res. 8, 1–14 (1957), 9, 299–318 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ross, M. A. & Harper, J. L. J. Ecol. 60, 77–88 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mack, R. N. & Harper, J. L. J. Ecol. 65, 345–363 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

RABINOWITZ, D. Bimodal distributions of seedling weight in relation to density of Festuca paradoxa Desv.. Nature 277, 297–298 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/277297a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/277297a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation