Skip to main content
Log in

Apomixis may be widespread among trees of the climax rain forest

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 01 April 1978

Abstract

THE exceptional species diversity of tropical rain forests is well known; of these the lowland forests of the Malay Peninsula are among the richest1. This, and the size of the trees, pose obvious difficulties for the maintenance of pan-mixis, and tempt speculation on the processes by which such diversity has evolved and may now be favoured. Fedorov2 suggested that natural selection is low and self-pollination prevalent, favouring random genetic drift. Prevalence of random drift, or apomixis—agamospermy—would contradict Ashton's3 view that, given a stable environment, evolution proceeds through ecotypic differentiation while diversity accrues through ever increasing niche specialisation; for this view to be correct, maintenance of genetic variability within breeding groups would be essential. Solid evidence has been meagre but there is evidence4 that genetic polymorphism, and hence heterozygosity, is common in the emergent tree Shorea leprosula Miq., and Xerospermum intermedium Radlk., an undeirstorey species. The pattern of spatial variation is consistent with the view that these species are outbreeders in which predominantly short-range pollen and fruit dispersal are accompanied by short-range heterogeneity in gene frequencies. However, both are common trees with minimal spatial isolation. We now report the occurrence of apomixis in some other rain forest trees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whitmore, T. C. Tropical Rain Forests of the Far East (Oxford University Press Oxford, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fedorov, A. A. J. Ecol. 54, 1 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashton, P. S. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1, 155 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yap, Y. Y., Robertson, F. W., Ashton, P. S., Soepadmo, E. & Lee, D. W. Nature 269, 323 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Purseglove, J. W. Tropical Crops: Dicotyledons. (Longman, London, 1975.)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Treub, M. Ann. Jard. bot. Buitenz. 24, 1 (1911).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horn, C. L. Science 92, 237 (1940).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bernardo, F. A., Jesena, C C. & Ramirez, C. C. Philip. Agric. Rev. 44, 8, 415 (1961).

  9. Jong, K. in Tropical Trees: Variation, Breeding and Conservation (eds Burley, J. & Styles, B. T.), 79 (London and New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jong, K. & Lethbridge, A. Notes R. Bot. Gdn Edin. 27, 2, 175 (1967).

  11. Maury, G. Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Toulouse 104, 1–2, 187 (1968); ibid 106, 282 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foxworthy, F. W. Mal. For. Rec. 10 (1932).

  13. Maury, G. Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Toulouse 106, 277 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maguire, B. Taxon 25, 241 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ashton, P. & Ashton, M. (eds) Univ. Hull Dept Geog. Misc. Ser. 13, 121 (1972).

  16. Dobzhansky, T. Am. Sci. 38, 209 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KAUR, A., HA, C., JONG, K. et al. Apomixis may be widespread among trees of the climax rain forest. Nature 271, 440–442 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/271440a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/271440a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation