Skip to main content
Log in

Why has Regge pole theory survived?

  • Review Article
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

In spite of a very mixed record of success and failure, Regge theory, in which the notion of complex angular momentum is introduced into quantum mechanics still lives on. What has dissuaded physicists from discarding it, and what is our present assessment of the theory?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Regge, T. Nuovo Cimento 14, 951 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kronig, R. J. opt. Soc. Am. 12, 547 (1926).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kramers, H. A. Atti. Congr. Intern. Fisici, Como 2, 545 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gracomelli, G. Phys. Rep. 23 c, no. 2 (1976).

  5. Baker, W. F. et al. Phys. Lett. 38 B, 342 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Joynson, D., Leader, E., Lopez, C. & Nicolescu, B. Nuovo Cimento 30 A, 345 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Meuller, A. H. Phys. Rev. D 2, 2963 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leader, E. Why has Regge pole theory survived?. Nature 271, 213–216 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/271213a0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/271213a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation