Skip to main content
Log in

Implications of a revised fit between Australia and Antarctica for the evolution of the Eastern Indian Ocean

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

GRIFFITHS1 suggested that the computer fits of Australia and Antarctica2–4 are not supported by geology and that a better fit can be obtained by moving Australia 250 km westwards along the coast of Antarctica in the computer fitted reconstructions. Griffiths's revised fit eliminates the overlap of the South Tasman Rise, now known to be of continental origin5, and the Iselin plateau. Laird et al.6 showed that new geological evidence from Tasmania and East Antarctica favour such a revised reconstruction over the older computer fits. We present a slight modification to the fits given by Griffiths and by Laird et al. that, in addition, allows a good fit of magnetic anomaly lineations and fracture zone trends on the India7 and Antarctic8 plates (Fig. 1). This revised reconstruction thus implies that India and Australia have been parts of the same plate since the time of anomaly 22 (about 50 Myr ago). It also substantially reduces the size of the postulated Greater India9–11 (Fig. 2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Griffiths, J. R. Nature 249, 336 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith, A. G. & Hallam, A. Nature 225, 139 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sproll, W. P. & Dietz, R. S. Nature 222, 345 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. McKenzie, D. & Sclater, J. G. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 24, 437 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kennett, J. P. et al. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 29, 271–315 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laird, M. G., Cooper, R. A. & Jago, J. B. Nature 265, 107 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sclater, J. G. & Fisher, R. L. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 85, 683–702 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schlich, R. Mém. Hors-Série Soc. Géol. de France no. 6 (1975).

  9. Curray, J. & Moore, D. G. in The Geology of Continental Margins, 617 (Springer, New York, 1974).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Veevers, J. J., Powell, C. M. & Johnson, B. D. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 27, 383 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, B. D., Powell, C. M. & Veevers, J. J. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 87, 1560 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peirce, J. thesis, Massachusets Institute of Technology and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (1977).

  13. Davies, T. A. et al. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 26, 281–294 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaharoeddin, F. A., Weaver, F. M. & Wise, S. W. Antarctic J. US 8, 297 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ewing, M., Eittreim, S., Truchan, M. & Ewing, J. Deep Sea Res. 16, 231 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Watkins, N. D., Gunn, B. M., Nougier, J. & Baksi, A. K. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer. 85, 201 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lambeth, A. J. J. R. Soc. N.S.W. 85, 14 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weissel, J. K. & Hayes, D. E. in Antarctic Oceanology II: The Australian–New Zealand Sector, Antarctic Res. Series 19, 165 (American Geophysical Union, Washington, 1972).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Veevers, J. J., Jones, J. G. & Talent, J. A. Nature 229, 383 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gansser, A. Ecologae Geol. Helv. 59, 831 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mattauer, M. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 28, 144 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Warsi, W. E. K. & Molnar, P. in Ecologie et Geologie de l'Himalyaya, Colloque International (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

NORTON, I., MOLNAR, P. Implications of a revised fit between Australia and Antarctica for the evolution of the Eastern Indian Ocean. Nature 267, 338–340 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/267338a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/267338a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation