Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparison of acoustic Doppler vertical velocities with direct measurements in the atmospheric boundary layer

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE quantitative evaluation of the intensity of acoustic echoes from the first few hundred metres of the atmospheric boundary layer (in both stable and convective situations) has been the subject of much recent experimental work1–5. The acoustic echo, however, contains Doppler information on the vertical air motion and this could prove of great use in the specification of further important boundary layer statistics such as σw2, the variance of the vertical wind speed6 and ɛ, the rate of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy. Beran et al.7 using a sounder in the monostatic mode (transmitter and receiver aerials located together) derived the profile of the vertical wind component using the acoustic Doppler technique. They did not, however, verify that the estimates of the winds were correct, nor did they record the magnitudes of the Doppler shifts in the weak echo regions between the periods of thermal activity. This paper presents a quantitative comparison between acoustic Doppler vertical winds and direct estimates measured at a fixed height in the atmosphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asimakopoulos, D. N., Cole, R. S., Caughey, S. J., Moss, S. H., and Readings, C. J., Atmos. Environ., 9, 775–776 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Asimakopoulos, D. N., Cole, R. S., Caughey, S. J., and Crease, B. A., Boundary Layer Meteorol. (in the press).

  3. Neff, W. D., NOAA Tech. Rep, ERL—322—WPL 38, Boulder, Colorado, (1975).

  4. Haugen, D. A., Kaimal, J. C., and Newman, J. T., AFCRL Instrumentation Paper No. 236, Bedford, Mass, 59 pp (1975).

  5. MacAllister, L. G., J. atm. terr. Phys., 30, 1439–1440 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelton, C., and Bricout, P., Bull. Am. met. Soc., 45, 571–580 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beran, D. W., Little, C. G., and Willmarth, B. C., Nature, 230, 160–162 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Simmons, W. R., Wescott, J. W., and Hall, F. F., Jr, NOAA Tech. Rep. ERL–216–WPL 17, Boulder, Colorado, (1971).

  9. Readings, C. J., and Butler, H. E., Met. Mag., Lond., 101, 286–298 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haugen, D. A., Kaimal, J. C., Readings, C. J., and Rayment, R., J. appl. Met., 14, 540–545 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Spizzichino, A., J. geophys. Res, 79, 5585–5591 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Painter, H. E., Met. Mag., Lond., 99, 93–98 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CAUGHEY, S., CREASE, B., ASIMAKOPOULOS, D. et al. A comparison of acoustic Doppler vertical velocities with direct measurements in the atmospheric boundary layer. Nature 262, 274–276 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/262274a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/262274a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation