Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical interpretation of enthalpy–entropy compensation

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

TYPICALLY, enthalpy and entropy estimates from kinetic and equilibrium data are highly correlated, varying in a linear fashion with one another (enthalpy–entropy compensation effect). This effect can be readily explained in most cases simply as a statistical or data handling artefact. The statistical analysis presented here reveals three novel insights. First, the enthalpy and entropy parameter estimates are highly correlated, such that estimated correlation coefficients > 0.95, say, do not imply chemical causation. Second, enthalpy and entropy estimates are distributed by experimental and measurement errors in elliptical probability regions that are very elongated and appear as lines. The slope of such lines is the harmonic mean of the experimental temperatures. Third, estimates of enthalpy and free energy at the harmonic mean of the experimental temperatures are not statistically correlated, so any observed structured variation between these parameter estimates arises from the chemical effect alone. Note that, since the thermodynamic potentials are interrelated by the Maxwell relationships, a correlation between any two potentials can be transformed to give the corresponding correlation between any other two. We now discuss these results to resolve a number of issues concerning a much disputed data set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leffler, J. E., and Grunwald, E., Rates and Equilibria of Organic Reactions, 315–402 (Wiley, New York, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leffler, J. E., J. org. Chem., 20, 1202–1231 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Craft, M. J., and Lester, C. T., J. Am. chem. Soc., 73, 1127–1128 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leffler, J. E., Nature, 205, 1101–1102 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Exner, O., Coll. Czech. chem. commun., 29, 1094–1113 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Exner, O., Nature, 201, 488–490 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammett, L. P., Physical Organic Chemistry, 391–408 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lumry, R., and Rajender, J., Biopolymers, 9, 1125–1227 (1970); J. phys. Chem., 75, 1387–1401 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Exner, O., Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun., 37, 1425–1444 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Exner, O., Nature, 227, 366–367 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Blackadder, D. A., and Hinshelwood, C., J. chem. Soc., 2720–2727 (1958).

  12. Leffler, J. E., J. org. Chem., 31, 533–537 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown, R. F., J. org. Chem., 27, 3015–3026 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KRUG, R., HUNTER, W. & GRIEGER, R. Statistical interpretation of enthalpy–entropy compensation. Nature 261, 566–567 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/261566a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/261566a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation