Skip to main content
Log in

Scanning immunoelectron microscopy of mouse B and T lymphocytes

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

ALTHOUGH B and T lymphocytes (derived from the bone marrow or thymus, respectively) are functionally different, they are not morphologically distinguishable by ordinary light and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Thus immunospecific labels had to be developed for these methods to identify populations of lymphocytes1,2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been reported to show that T cells are smooth and B cells are villous3,4. This conclusion, however, is controversial, and it is uncertain whether T and B lymphocytes can be distinguished by SEM appearance5,6. We have now used immunospecific latex markers, which can be visualised by SEM, to identify cells with known T and B-associated antigenic surface determinants in the mouse. Mouse B cells have small stubby projections and are generally smoother than mouse T cells, which may be either villous or have few projections, but there is no distinct morphological difference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raff, M. C., Transplant. Rev., 6, 52 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Matter, A., Lisowska-Bernstein, B., Ryser, J. E., Lamelin, J.-P., Vassalli, P., J. exp. Med., 136, 1008 (1972).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Polliack, A., Lampen, N., Clarkson, B. D., DeHarven, E., Bentwich, Z., Siegal, F. P., and Kunkel, H. G., J. exp. Med., 138, 607–624 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin, P. S., Cooper, A. G., and Wortis, H. H., New Engl. J. Med., 289, 548–551 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sullivan, A. K., Adams, L. S., Silke, I., and Jerry, L. M., New Engl., J. Med., 290, 689 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Galey, F. R., Prchal, J. T., Amromin, G. D., and Jhurani, Y., New Engl. J. Med., 290, 690 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. LoBuglio, A. F., Rinehart, J. J., and Balcerzak, S. P., in Proc. Fifth Annual Scanning Electron Microscopy Symposium, Chicago, Part 3, 313 (IIT Research Institute, Chicago, Illinois, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Sousa, M. A. B., Parrot, D. M. V., and Pantelouris, E. M., Clin. exp. Immun., 4, 637 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wortis, H. H., Clin. exp. Immun., 8, 305 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Julius, M. H., Simpson, E., and Herzenberg, L. A., Eur. J. Immun., 3, 645 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen, A. C., Marlow, D. P., and Garner, G. E., J. Microscopie, 7, 331–342 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Linthicum, D. S., and Sell, S., Cell Immun., 12, 443–458 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Linthicum, D. S., Miyai, K., Sell, S., and Wagner, R. M., Fedn Proc., 33, 765A (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, P. S., Wallach, D. F. H., and Tsai, S., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 2492 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Boyde, A., Weiss, R. A., and Vesely, P., Expl Cell Res., 71, 313 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fraumeni, J. F., Li, F. P., and Dalager, N., J. natn. Cancer Inst., 51, 1425 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LINTHICUM, D., SELL, S., WAGNER, R. et al. Scanning immunoelectron microscopy of mouse B and T lymphocytes. Nature 252, 173–175 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/252173a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/252173a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation