Skip to main content
Log in

Marscoite and the origin of andesites

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE present communication points out certain discrepancies between the arguments of those who dispute a contamination origin for andesitic lavas and the evidence provided by one specific and well documented example of contamination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Green, T. H., and Ringwood, A. E., Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 1, 307 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peterman, Z. E., Carmichael, I. S. E., and Smith, A. L., Bull. geol. Soc. Am., 81, 311 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moorbath, S., and Bell, J. D., J. Petrology, 6, 37 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wager, L. R., Vincent, E. A., Brown, G. M., and Bell, J. D., Phil. Trans. R. Soc, A 257, 273 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mem. geol. Surv. UK, Glencoe and Ben Nevis (Institute of Geological Sciences, London, 1960).

  6. Smith, A. L., and Carmichael, I. S. E., Contr. Miner. Petrol., 19, 212 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ROCK, N. Marscoite and the origin of andesites. Nature 249, 544–545 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/249544a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/249544a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation