Skip to main content
Log in

Excess of Like Sexed Pairs of Dizygotic Twins

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

BEFORE recent developments with marker genes, it was not possible to assign with certainty the zygosity of a substantial proportion of twin pairs. So it was usual, when estimating the incidence of monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) pairs, to use Weinberg's differential rule1, which postulates that among DZ pairs the frequencies of same sex and of opposite sex pairs are almost exactly equal (the difference from equality being occasioned by an adjustment for the sex ratio). Although it is important to know whether this is true, as far as I know, it has never been adequately tested, though the suggestion has been made more than once that estimates (based on Weinberg's rule) of the frequency of MZ twins seem to be too high10,15. I have some suggestions to explain this disparity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weinberg, W., Arch. Ges. Physiol., 88, 346 (1902).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Simmons, R. T., Graydon, J. J., Jacobowicz, R., and Doig, R. K., Med. J. Austral., ii, 246 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cameron, A. H., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 61, 229 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nylander, P. P. S., J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Commonwealth, 77, 506 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, S. M., and Penrose, L. S., Ann. Human Genet., 19, 273 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Potter, E. L., Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec., 87, 566 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Walsh, R. J., and Kooptzoff, O., Austral. J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci., 33, 189 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Corney, G., Robson, E. B., and Strong, S. J., Ann. Human Genet., 32, 89 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nylander, P. P. S., J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Commonwealth, 76, 699 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nylander, P. P. S., and Corney, G., Ann. Human. Genet., 33, 31 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stevenson, A. C., Ann. Human Genet., 23, 415 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tricomi, V., Serr, D., and Solish, G., Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec., 79, 505 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carr, D. H., Obstet. Gynec., 26, 308 (1965).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barr, A., and Stevenson, C., Ann. Human Genet., 25, 131 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Renkonen, K. O., Ann. Human Genet., 30, 277 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cannings, C., Ann. Human Genet., 32, 403 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dahlberg, G., Twin Births and Twins from a Hereditary Point of View (Bokforlags—A.-B. Tidens Tryckeri, Stockholm, 1926).

    Google Scholar 

  18. James, W. H., Lancet, i, 112 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

JAMES, W. Excess of Like Sexed Pairs of Dizygotic Twins. Nature 232, 277–278 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/232277a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/232277a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation