Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Air Exposure and Occlusion on Experimental Human Skin Wounds

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE benefits of special dressings versus air exposure of cutaneous wounds has long been debated. Winter and Scales1,2 have recently added fresh insight into the problem. In the domestic pig they demonstrated that an occlusive dressing doubles the rate of wound re-epithelization when compared with wounds exposed to the air. In this communication we report parallel studies performed in man.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Winter, G. D., Nature, 193, 293 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Winter, G. D., and Scales, J. T., Nature, 197, 91 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HINMAN, C., MAIBACH, H. Effect of Air Exposure and Occlusion on Experimental Human Skin Wounds. Nature 200, 377–378 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/200377a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/200377a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation