Abstract
THE introduction of chlorothiazide (Table 1, I) in 1957 marked a major advance1 in the search for improved non-mercurial diuretics. Its advent was followed by a succession of more potent derivatives2. Clinically, however, apart from the size of dose, all these derivatives produced a similar therapeutic response3. One of the few disadvantages of these compounds is the loss of potassium which occurs concurrently with the excretion of sodium ions and can necessitate the administration of potassium supplements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Novello, F. C., and Sprague, J. M., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 79, 2028 (1957).
Schlittler, E., Destevens, G., and Werner, L., Angew. Chem., 1, 5, 235 (1962).
Wilson, G. M., Prescribers J., 1, No. 5, 55 (1961).
cf. Novello, F. C., et al., J. Org. Chem., 25, 970 (1960).
B.P. 36821/60.
B.P. 27562/61.
Blagg, C. R., (personal communication. 1962).
Dollery, C. T. (personal communication, 1962).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CORNISH, E., LEE, G. & WRAGG, W. 5-Chloro-2-cyclohexyl-1-oxo-6-sulphamoyl Isoindoline : a New Diuretic. Nature 197, 1296–1297 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/1971296b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1971296b0
- Springer Nature Limited