Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Source of Error in the Colorimetric Estimation of Uranium

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

FOR several years I have obtained consistent results with the hydrogen peroxide method1 for the estimation of uranium, the intensity of the peruranate colour being measured with a Pulfrich photometer with filter S.43 (effective filter gravity, 434 mµ). In the hope of achieving greater accuracy and reproducibility, a modern type of spectrophotometer was recently substituted for the visual photometer, the colours being measured at 360 mµ (where the extinction for a given uranium content is nearly three times greater than at 434 mµ). It was found, however, that results were frequently low by as much as 30 per cent, although the same solutions gave the correct result when the absorption was measured with the Pulfrich photometer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sandell, E. B., "Colorimetric Determination of Traces of Metals" (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1944).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SCOTT, T. A Source of Error in the Colorimetric Estimation of Uranium. Nature 163, 768–769 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1038/163768b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/163768b0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation