Skip to main content
Log in

Has the Case for Direct Organic Adaptation been Fully Stated?

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE heading of this letter is in the form of a question for the following reasons: (1) It is impossible to keep pace with the literature on the subject of Evolution while engaged on any other absorbing work; and (2) so many giants have been engaged in the discussion, that it requires courage even to suggest that a point has been overlooked. It seems to me that nothing could be added to Herbert Spencer's convincing arguments that acquired characters must somehow be transmitted. I wish merely to suggest a method of describing this transmission which I have, never yet seen in print, and which, I must think, is not generally recognised, inasmuch as it modifies Weismann's “contradictory facts” into not insuperable difficulties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BERNARD, H. Has the Case for Direct Organic Adaptation been Fully Stated?. Nature 50, 546–547 (1894). https://doi.org/10.1038/050546b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/050546b0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation