Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Culture of Enquiry: Research Evidence and the Therapeutic Community

  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents data from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 published studies of therapeutic community effectiveness using controls, including 8 randomised control trials. Meta-regressions suggest that the two types of therapeutic community, democratic and concept-based, and the age of the study, are the key sources of heterogeneity in the collection of studies analysed. Otherwise, heterogeneity is low and the meta-analysis confirms the effectiveness of therapeutic community treatment with overall summary log odds ratio for the 29 studies of −0.512 (95% ci −0.598 to −0.426).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Jones M: Social Psychiatry. London, Tavistock, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bion WR: Experiences in Groups. London, Tavistock, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Foulkes SR: Introduction to Group Analytic Psychotherapy. London, Heinemann, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Main T: The Hospital as a Therapeutic Institution. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 10:66–70, 1946. (Reprinted in Therapeutic Communities 17(2):77–80).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harrison T: Bion, Rickman, Foulkes and the Northfield Experiments. Advancing on a Different Front. London, Jessica Kingsley, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Black T: Sound and fury: Grief and despair in the large group, in Therapeutic Communities: Past, Present and Future. Edited by Campling P, Haigh R. London, Jessica Kingsley, 1999. pp. 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coombe P: Glimpses of a Cassel Hospital Outpatient Group. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 29:309–315, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rapoport RN: Community as Doctor. London, Tavistock, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jones M: Beyond the Therapeutic Community. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rapoport RN, Manning N: Rejection and re-incorporation: A case study in social research utilisation. Social Science and Medicine 10:458–468, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haigh R: The quintessence of a therapeutic environment: Five universal qualities, in Therapeutic Communities. Past, Present and Future. Edited by Campling P, Haigh R. London, Jessica Kingsley, 1999, pp. 246–257.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bloor MJ, McKeganey NP, Fonkert JD: One Foot in Eden. London, Routledge, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chiesa M, Fonagy P: Cassel personality disorder study: Methodology and treatment effects. British Journal of Psychiatry 176:485–491, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chiesa M, Iacoponi E, Morris M: Changes in health service utilization by patients with severe personality disorders before and after inpatient psychosocial treatment. British Journal of Psychotherapy 12(4):501–512, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cullen E: Grendon: The therapeutic prison that works Therapeutic Communities 15(4)301–311, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marshall P: A Reconviction Study of HMP Grendon Therapeutic Community (Research findings no. 53). London, Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Newton M: Changes in Test Scores During Treatment at Grendon. Research and Development Unit, Grendon Underwood. Bucks, UK, HMP Springhill and Grendon, Unpublished research paper, 1997.

  18. Shine J: A Compilation of Grendon Research. Aylesbury, UK, HMP Grendon, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Warren F, Dolan B: Perspectives on Henderson Hospital, 2nd ed. Sutton, Surrey, Henderson Hospital, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yablonsky L: Synanon: The Tunnel Back. New York, Macmillan, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sugarman B: Daytop Village: A Therapeutic Community. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  22. De Leon G: The Phoenix House Therapeutic Community: Changes in psychopathological signs. Archives of General Psychiatry 28:131–135, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  23. De Leon G: Residential Therapeutic Communities in the Mainstream: Diversity and issues. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 27:(1):3–15, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ogbourne AC, Melotte C: An evaluation of a Therapeutic Community for former drug users. British Journal of Addiction 72(1)75–82, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson S, Mandelbrote B: The relationship between duration of treatment in a therapeutic community for drug abusers and subsequent criminality. British Journal of Psychiatry 132:487–491, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wexler H: Therapeutic Communities in American prisons, in Therapeutic Community for Offenders. Edited by Cullen E, Jones L, Woodward R. Chichester, Wiley, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lees J: Practice evaluation of Therapeutic Communities, in A Culture of Enquiry. Research Evidence and the Therapeutic Community. Edited by Lees J, Manning N, Menzies D, Morant N. London, Jessica Kingsley, 2004, pp. 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lees J: ‘Research. The Importance of Asking Questions,’ in Therapeutic Communities. Past, Present and Future. Edited by Campling P, Haigh R. London, Jessica Kingsley, 1999, pp. 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lees J, Manning N, Rawlings B: Therapeutic Community Effectiveness: A Systematic International Review of Therapeutic Community Treatment for People with Personality Disorders and Mentally Disordered Offenders (CRD Report no. 17). York, NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  30. CRD (Centre for Reviews and Dissemination): Undertaking Systematic reviews of Research on Effectiveness (CRD Report no. 4). York, University of York, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Artus HM: Science indicators derived from databases. Scientometrics 37:297–311, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Seglen PO: Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal 314:498–502, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kahn HA, Sempos CT: Statistical Methods in Epidemiology. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thompson SG, Sharp SJ: Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: A comparison of methods. Statistics in Medicine 18:2693–2708, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal 315:629–634, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gunderson JG: Building structure for the borderline construct. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 89(suppl. 379):12–18, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  37. DoH/HO: Report of the Department of Health/Home Office working group on psychopathic disorder. London, HMSO, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Manning N: Psychiatric diagnosis under conditions of uncertainty: Personality disorder, science, and professional legitimacy. Sociology of Health and Illness 22(5):621–639, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Manning N: Actor-networks, policy networks and personality disorder. Sociology of Health and Illness 24(5):644–666, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Glaser AN: Therapeutic communities and therapeutic communities: A personal perspective. International Journal of Therapeutic Communities 4(2)150–162, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  41. De Leon G: The research context for therapeutic communities in the USA, in A Culture of Enquiry. Research Evidence and the Therapeutic Community. Edited by Lees J, Manning N, Menzies D, Morant N. London, Jessica Kingsley, 2004, pp. 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Clarke RVG, Cornish DB: The Controlled Trial in Institutional Research—paradigm or pitfall for penal evaluators. London, HMSO, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nieminen P: Therapeutic community research and statistical data analysis. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis Medica, Oulu: University of Oulu Printing Center, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Francis Dixon Lodge, Leicester, United Kingdom

    Jan Lees (Research Associate)

  2. University of Nottingham, United Kingdom

    Nick Manning (Professor of Social Policy and Sociology)

  3. Department of Sociology, University of Manchester, United Kingdom

    Barbara Rawlings (Honorary Research Fellow)

Authors
  1. Jan Lees
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nick Manning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Barbara Rawlings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lees, J., Manning, N. & Rawlings, B. A Culture of Enquiry: Research Evidence and the Therapeutic Community. Psychiatr Q 75, 279–294 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PSAQ.0000031797.74295.f8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PSAQ.0000031797.74295.f8

Search

Navigation