Skip to main content
Log in

The SELF-PRUNING gene family in tomato

  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The SELF PRUNING (SP) gene controls the regularity of the vegetative-reproductive switch along the compound shoot of tomato and thus conditions the `determinate' (sp/sp) and `indeterminate' (SP ) growth habits of the plant. SP is a developmental regulator which is homologous to CENTRORADIALIS (CEN) from Antirrhinum and TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) from Arabidopsis. Here we report that SP is a member of a gene family in tomato composed of at least six genes, none of which is represented in the tomato EST collection. Sequence analysis of the SP gene family revealed that its members share homology along their entire coding regions both among themselves and with the six members of the Arabidopsis family. Furthermore, members of the gene family in the two species display a common genomic organization (intron-exon pattern). In tomato, phylogenetically close homologues diverged considerably with respect to their organ expression patterns while SP2I and its closest homologue from Arabidopsis (MFT) exhibited constitutive expression. This reserarch focusing on a plant of sympodial growth habit sets the stage for a functional analysis of this weakly expressed gene family which plays a key role in determining plant architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W. and Lipman, D.J. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSIBLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl. Acids Res. 25: 3389–3402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, J., Guli, C.L. and Yx, D.R.S. 1992. Terminal flower: a gene affecting inflorescence development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2: 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaya, I., Ratcliffe, O.J. and and Bradley, D.J. 1999. Expression of CENTRORADIALIS (CEN) and CEN-like genes in tobacco reveals a conserved mechanism controlling phase change in diverse species. Plant Cell 11: 1405–1417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atherton, J.G. and Harris, G.P. 1986. Flowering. In: J.G. Atherton, and J. Rudich (Eds.) The Tomato Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 171–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfield, M.J. and Brady, R.L. 2000. The structure of Antirrhinum centroradialis protein (CEN) suggests a role as a kinase regulator. J. Mol. Biol. 297: 1159–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfield, M.J., Barker, J.J., Perry, A.C. and Brady, R.L. 1998. Function from structure? The crystal structure of human phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein suggests a role in membrane signal transduction. Structure 6: 1245–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P.R. 1992. Green Plants: Their Origin and Diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D., Carpenter, R., Copsey, L., Vincent, C., Rothstein, S. and Coen, E. 1996. Control of inflorescence architecture in Antirrhinum. Nature 379: 791–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D., Ratcliffe, O., Vincent, C., Carpenter, R. and Coen, E. 1997. Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science 275: 80–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. 1988. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. Allen Press, Lawrence, KS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridman, E., Liu, Y.S., Carmel-Goren, L., Gur, A., Shoresh, M., Pleban, T., Eshed, Y. and Zamir, D. 2002. Two tightly linked QTLs modify tomato sugar content via different physiological pathways. Mol. Genet. Genomics 266: 821–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandy, D.K., Hanneman, E., Bunzow, J., Shih, M., Machida, C.A., Bidlack, J.M. and Civelli, O. 1990. Purification, cloning and tissue distribution of a 23-kDa rat protein isolated by morphine affinity chromatography. Mol. Endocrinol. 4: 1370–1376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hareven, D., Gutfinger, T., Parnis, A., Eshed, Y. and Lifschitz, E. 1996. The making of a compound leaf: genetic manipulation of leaf architecture in tomato. Cell 84: 735–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardailsky, I., Shukla, V.K., Ahn, J.H., Dagenais, N., Christensen, S.K., Nguyen, J.T., Chory, J., Harrison, M.J. and Weigel, D. 1999. Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science 286: 1962–1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, Y., Kaya, H., Goto, K., Iwabuchi, M. and Araki, T. 1999. A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. Science 286: 1960–1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ku, H.M., Vision, T., Liu, J. and Tanksley, S.D. 2000. Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 9121–9126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mimida, N., Goto, K., Kobayashi, Y., Araki, T., Ahn, J.H., Weigel, D., Murata, M., Motoyoshi, F. and Sakamoto, W. 2001. Functional divergence of the TFL1-like gene family in Arabidopsis revealed by characterization of a novel homologue. Genes Cells 6: 327–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohshima, S., Murata, M., Sakamoto, W., Ogura, Y. and Motoyoshi, F. 1997. Cloning and molecular analysis of the Arabidopsis gene Terminal Flower 1. Mol. Gen. Genet. 254: 186–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, R.D.M. 1996. TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer applications. Biosciences 12: 357–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Q., Liu, Y. S., Budai-Hadrian, O., Sela, M., Carmel-Goren, L., Zamir, D. and Fluhr, R. 2000. Comparative genetics of nucleotide binding site: leucine rich repeat resistance gene homologues in the genomes of two dicotyledons: tomato and arabidopsis. Genetics 155: 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnis, A., Cohen, O., Gutfinger, T., Hareven, D., Zamir, D. and Lifschitz, E. 1997. Two different developmental mutants of tomato, Mouse ear and Curl, are associated with two distinct modes of abnormal transcriptional regulation of a KNOTTED gene. Plant Cell 9: 2143–2158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pnueli, L., Carmel-Goren, L., Hareven, D., Gutfinger, T., Alvarez, J., Ganal, M., Zamir, D. and Lifschitz, E. 1998. The SELFPRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development 125: 1979–1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pnueli, L., Gutfinger, T., Hareven, D., Ben-Naim, O., Ron, N. and Adir, N. 2001. Tomato SP-interacting proteins define a conserved signaling system that regulates shoot architecture and flowering. Plant Cell 13: 2687–2702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitou, N. and Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoentgen, F. and Jolles, P. 1995. From structure to function: possible biological roles of a new widespread protein family binding hydrophobic ligands and displaying a nucleotide binding site. FEBS Lett. 369: 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serre, L., Vallee, B., Bureaund, N., Schoentgen, F. and Zelwer, C. 1998. Crystal structure of the phosphatidylethanolaminebinding protein from bovine brain: a novel structural class of phospholipid-binding proteins. Structure 6: 1255–1265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serre, L., Pereira de Jesus, K., Zelwer, C., Bureaud, N., Schoentgen, F. and Benedetti, H. 2001. Crystal structures of YBHB and YBCL from Escherichia coli, two bacterial homologues to a Raf kinase inhibitor protein. J. Mol. Biol. 310: 617–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, S. and Meeks-Wagner, D. 1991. A mutation in the Arabidopsis TFL1 gene affects inflorescence meristem development. Plant Cell 3: 877–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simister, P.C., Banfield, M.J., and Brady R.L. 2002. The crystal structure of PEBP-2, a homologue of the PEBP/RKIP family. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58: 1077–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. and Gibson, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl. Acids Res. 22: 4673–4680.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Hoeven, R., Ronning, C., Giovannoni, J., Martin, G. and Tanksley, S. 2002. Deductions about the number, organization, and evolution of genes in the tomato genome based on analysis of a large expressed sequence tag collection and selective genomic sequencing. Plant Cell 14: 1441–1456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, A.F. 1927. Determinate growth in tomato. J. Hered. 18: 263–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamir, D. and Tanksley S.D. 1988. Tomato genome is comprised largely of fast evolving, low copy number sequences. Mol. Gen. Genet. 213: 254–261.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carmel-Goren, L., Liu, Y.S., Lifschitz, E. et al. The SELF-PRUNING gene family in tomato. Plant Mol Biol 52, 1215–1222 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLAN.0000004333.96451.11

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLAN.0000004333.96451.11

Navigation