Abstract
The first code of professional ethics must: (1)be a code of ethics; (2) apply to members of a profession; (3) apply to allmembers of that profession; and (4) apply only to members of that profession. The value of these criteria depends on how we define “code”, “ethics”, and “profession”, terms the literature on professions has defined in many ways. This paper applies one set of definitions of “code”, “ethics”, and “profession” to a part of what we now know of the history of professions, there by illustrating how the choice of definition can alter substantially both our answer to the question of which came first and (more importantly) our understanding of professional codes (and the professions that adopt them). Because most who write on codes of professional ethics seem to take for granted that physicians produced the first professional code, whether the Hippocratic Oath, Percival’s Medical Ethics, the 1847 Code of Ethicsof the American Medical Association (AMA), or some other document, I focus my discussion on these codes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Baker, Robert. “Deciphering Percival's Code.” In Codification of Medical Morality. Edited by Robert Baker et al. 179–211. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993.
Baker, Robert B. et al., eds. The American Medical Ethics Revolution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.
Beauchamp, Tom L. and James F. Childress. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1979.
Davis, Michael. Profession, Code, and Ethics. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.
Durkheim, Emile. Professional Ethics and Civic Moral. London: Routledge, 1957.
Friedson, Elliot. Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.
Gjerset, Knut. History of Iceland. New York: Macmillan Company, 1924.
Gorlin, Rena A., ed. Codes of Professional Responsibility. Washington, D.C.: The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., 1986.
Johnson, David. Roman Law in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Jonsen, Albert R. A Short History of Medical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Ladd, John. “The Quest for a Code of Professional Ethics: An Intellectual and Moral Confusion.” In AAAS Professional Ethics Project: Professional Ethics Activities in the Scientific and Engineering Societies. Edited by Rosemary Chalk, Mark S. Frankel, and Sallie B. Chafer. 154–159. Washington, D.C.: AAAS, 1980.
Maehle, Andreas-Holger and Johanna Geyer-Kordesch, eds. Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on Biomedical Ethics. Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 2002.
Percival, Thomas. Medical Ethics; or a Code of Institutes and precepts Adopted to the Professional Conduct of Physicians and Surgeons. Manchester: S. Russell, 1803.
Sulmasy, Daniel P. “What is an Oath and Why Should a Physician Swear One?” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1999): 329–346.
Tröhler, Ulrich and Stella Reiter-Theil, eds. Ethics Codes in Medicine: Foundations and Achievements of Codification Since 1947. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.
Waddington, Ivan. “The Development of Medical Ethics: A Sociological Analysis.” Medical History 19 (1975): 36–51.
Watson, Alan. The Spirit of Roman Law. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1995.
Weber, Max. Economy and Society. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, M. What can we learn by looking for the first code of professional ethics?. Theor Med Bioeth 24, 433–454 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:META.0000006831.28435.38
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:META.0000006831.28435.38