Abstract
Researchers agree that science education should begin at childhood, due to its contribution to later cognitive skill development. However, in most cases only a small portion of kindergarten and elementary school activities is related to science. Given the tremendous impact teachers have on children and on the success or failure of their curriculum, teachers' efficacy belief toward science teaching (TEBTST) should be of significant concern. It is suggested herein that in order to improve TEBTST, the science curriculum should be developed not only from the perspective of the child's needs, but will explicitly consider the teachers' needs as well. Such an approach is described in this study, and is labeled as the “Inquiry Events” (IE) teaching method. This method involves relating to an open-ended problem situated in real life, that encourages investigation of a variety of issues—ethical, economic, scientific, etc.—which both kindergarten and elementary school teachers are accustomed to considering. The method encourages teachers to relate to these daily situations by introducing scientific questions, which they would ordinarily ignore or omit. Using the STEBI (Science Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument) questionnaire before and after a 4-day workshop introducing the IE method, it was found that IE improved TEBTST and increased their confidence in teaching science.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Cobren, W. W., and Loving, C. C. (2002). Investigation of perspective elementary teachers' thinking about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39: 1016–1031.
Cunningham, C. F., and Blankenship, J. W. (1979). Preservice elementary science teachers' self concerns. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 16: 419–425.
Dewey, J. (1916) Democracy and Education, Macmillan, New York, pp. 256–261.
Franz, J. R., and Enochs, L. G. (1982). Elementary school science: State certification requirements in science and their implications. Science Education 66: 287–292.
Gardner, A. L., and Cochran, K. F. (1993). Critical issues in reforming elementary teacher preparation in mathematics and science: Conference proceedings, Center for Research on Teaching and Learning, Greeley, CO.
Gibson, S., and Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher Efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 569–582.
Gustafson, B. J., and Rowell, P. M. (1995). Elementary preservice teachers: Constructing conceptions about learning science, teaching science and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education 17: 589–605.
Hurd, P. D. (1982). Scientific enlightenment for an age of science. The Science Teacher 37: 13–15.
Koballa, T. R, and Crawley, F. E. (1985). The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics 85: 222–232.
McDuffie, T. E., Jr. (2001). Scientists—geeks and nerds? Science and Children 38: 16–19.
Miller, G. E., Abrahamson, S., Cohen, I. S., Graser, H. P., Harnack, R. S., and Land, A. (1961). Teaching and Learning in Medical School. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts.
National Science Board Commission on Precollege Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. (1983) Educating Americans for the 21st century: A plan of action for improving mathematics, science, and technology education for all Americans elementary and secondary students so that their achievement is the best in the world by 1995. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
National Science Standards. The science as inquiry standards http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/nses/html/6a.html#sis
Nemecek, S., and Yam, P. (1997). Science versus antiscience? Scientific American 276: 96–101.
Park, R. L. (2000). Magical thinking. Issues in Science and Technology Online. http://www.nap.edu/issues/16.3/br_park.htm
Parker, J., and Spink, E. (1997). Becoming science teachers: An evaluation of the initial stages of elementary teacher training. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 22: 17–31.
Riggs, I. M., and Enochs, L. G (1990). Toward the Development of an Elementary Teacher's Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument. Science Education 74: 625–637.
Schoeneberger, M., and Russell, T. (1986). Elementary science as a little added frill: A report of two case studies. Science Education 70: 519–538.
Shrigley, R. L. (1974). The attitude of preservice elementary teachers toward science. School Science and Mathematics 74: 243–250.
Skamp, K., and Mueller, A. (2001). Student teachers' conceptions about effective elementary science teaching: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education 23: 331–351.
Spooner, W. E., and Simpson, R. D. (1979). The influence of a five-day teacher workshop on Attitudes of elementary school teachers toward science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics 79: 415–420.
Stepans, J., and McCormick, A. (1985). A study of scientific conceptions and attitudes toward science of prospective elementary teachers: A research report (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 266024).
Stevens, C. A., and Wenner, G. (1996). Elementary preservice teachers' knowledge and beliefs regarding science and Mathematics. School Science and Mathematics 96: 2–9.
Superior Committee on Science, Mathematics and Technology Education in Israel. (1992) Tomorrow 98. Publications Department, Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport, Jerusalem Israel.
Tosun, T. (2000). The beliefs of preservice elementary teachers towards science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics 100: 374–379.
Wallace, J., and Louden, W. (1992). Science teaching and teachers knowledge: Prospects for reform of elementary classrooms. Science Education 76: 507–521.
Yates, G. C. R., and Chandler, M. (2001). Where have all the skeptics gone? Patterns of new age beliefs and anti-scientific attitudes in preservice elementary teachers. Research in Science Education 30: 377–387.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eshach, H. Inquiry-Events as a Tool for Changing Science Teaching Efficacy Belief of Kindergarten and Elementary School Teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology 12, 495–501 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000006309.16842.c8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000006309.16842.c8