Skip to main content
Log in

QED Derived from the Two-Body Interaction

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have shown in a previous paper that the Dirac bispinor can vary like a four-vector and that Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) can be reproduced with this form of behaviour.(1) In Part I of this paper, we show that QED with the same transformational behaviour also holds in an alternative space we call M-space. We use the four-vector behaviour to model the two-body interaction in M and show that this has similar physical properties to the usual model in L which it predicts. In Part II of this paper we use M-space to show that QED can be reduced to two simple rules for a two-body interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. S. B. M. Bell, J. P. Cullerne, and B. M. Diaz, “Classical behaviour of the Dirac bispinor,” Found. Phys. 30 (1), 35-57 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. B. M. Bell, J. P. Cullerne, and B. M. Diaz, “The two-body interaction with a circle in time,” Found. Phys. 34 (2), 335-358 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. B. M. Bell and F. C. Holroyd, “Tesseral amalgamators and hierarchical tilings,” Image and Vision Computing 9 (5), 313-328 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. D. Bjorkin and S. D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (McGraw–Hill, 1964).

  5. N. Bohr, “On the constitution of atoms and molecules i,” Phil. Mag. 26 (I), 1-24 (1913).

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Bohr, “On the constitution of atoms and molecules ii,” Phil. Mag. 26 (XXXVII), 476-502 (1913).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Creutz, Quarks Gluons and Lattices (Cambridge University Press, London, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. M. Eisbeig, Fundamentals of Modern Physics (Wiley, London, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Falconer, Fractal Geometry, Mathematical Foundations, and Applications (Wiley, Chichester, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. B. Ho, “On the quantisation of angular momentum,” J. Phys. A 27, 6237-6242 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Si. Tomonaga, The Story of Spin (University of Chicago, London, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. A. Kastrup, “On the quantum levels of isolated spherically symmetric gravitational systems,” Phys. Lett. B 385, 75-80 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. B. Kogut, “An introduction to lattice guage theory and spin systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 51 (4), 659-713 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Majumdar and H. S. Sharatchandra, “Coherent states for the hydrogen atom,” Phys. Rev. A 56, R3322(1997).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. L. Martin, General Relativity, a First Course for Physicists, revised edition (Prentice–Hall, London, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. Montvay and G. Munster, Quantum Fields on a Lattice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Stehle, Order, Chaos, Order, the Transition from Classical to Quantum Physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. G. Wilson, “Confinement of quarks,” Phys. Rev. D 10 (8), 2445-2459 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, S.B.M., Cullerne, J.P. & Diaz, B.M. QED Derived from the Two-Body Interaction. Foundations of Physics 34, 297–333 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOOP.0000019585.77172.33

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOOP.0000019585.77172.33

Navigation