Abstract
10-year continuous U.S. climate simulations were conducted with the Regional Spectral Model (RSM) using boundary conditions from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction/Dept. of Energy reanalyses and the global PCM (Parallel Climate Model) simulations for present day (1986–1996) andfuture (2040–2050) CO2 concentrations (about a 36% increasedCO2). In order to examine the influence of physical parameterization differences as well as grid-resolution, fine resolution RSM simulations (50 km) were compared to coarse resolution (180 and 250 km) RSM simulations, which had resolutions comparable to the T62 reanalysis and PCM simulations. During the winter, the fine resolution RSM simulations provided more realistic detail over the western mountains. During the summer, large differences between the RSM and driving PCM simulations were found. Our results with presentCO2 suggest that most of the differences between the regionalclimate model simulations and the climate simulations driven by the global model used to drive the regional climate model were not due to the finer resolution of the regional climate model but to the different treatment of the physical processes in the two models, especially when the subgrid scale physics was important, like during summer. Compared to the coarse resolution RSM simulation results, on the other hand, the fine resolution RSM simulations did show improved simulation skills especially when a good boundary condition such as the reanalysis was used to drive the RSM. Under increased CO2, the driving PCM and downscaled RSM simulations exhibitedwarming over all vertical layers and all regions. Both the RSM and PCM had increased precipitation during the winter, but during the summer, the PCM simulation had an overall precipitation increase mainly due to increased subgrid scale convective activity, whereas the RSM simulations exhibited precipitation decreases and the resulting RSM soil moisture became dryer, especially in the U.S. Southwest. Most of differences in the simulated climate change signals were produced by the distinct model physics rather than by differences in grid resolution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, B. T. and Roads, J. O.: 2002, ‘Regional Simulation of Summertime Precipitation over the Southwestern United States’, J. Climate, 39 pp., in press.
Anderson, B. T., Roads, J. O., Chen, S.-C., and Juang, H.-M. H.: 2000a, ‘Regional Simulation of the Low-Level Monsoon Winds over the Gulf of California and Southwest United States’, JGR Atmospheres 105(D14), 17955–17969.
Anderson, B. T., Roads, J. O., and Chen, S.-C.: 2000b, ‘Large-Scale Forcing of Summertime Monsoon Surges over the Gulf of California and Southwest United States’, JGR-Atmospheres 105(D19), 24, 455–467.
Anderson, B. T., Roads, J. O., Chen, S.-C., and Juang H.-M. H.: 2001, ‘Model Dynamics of Summertime Low-Level Jets over Northwest Mexico’, JGR-Atmospheres 106(D4), 3401–3413.
Chen, S.-C.: 2001, ‘Model Mismatch between Global and Regional Simulations’, Geophys. Res. Lett., in press.
Chen, S.-C., Roads, J. O., Juang, H.-M. H., and Kanamitsu, M.: 1999, ‘Global to Regional Modeling: California Wintertime Precipitation’, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 31517–31532.
Dickinson, R. E., Errico, R. M., Giorgi, F., and Bates, G. T.: 1989, ‘A Regional Climate Model for the Western United States’, Clim. Change 15, 383–422.
Giorgi, F.: 1995, ‘Perspectives for Regional Earth System Modeling’, Global Plan. Change 10, 23–42.
Giorgi, F., Brodeur, C. S., and Bates, G. T.: 1994, ‘Regional Climate Change Scenarios over the United States Produced with a Nested Regional Climate Model’, J. Climate 7, 375–399.
Giorgi, F., Hurrel, J. W., Marinucci, M. R., and Beniston, M.: 1997, ‘Elevation Dependency of the Surface Climate Signal: A Model Study’, J. Climate 10, 288–296.
Han, J., Juang, H.-M. H., Hong, S.-Y., Kanamitsu, M., and Roads, J. O.: 2000, ‘Experimental Simulations with a New NCEP RSM’, The 2nd International RSM Workshop, Maui, Hawaii, July 17-21, 2000.
Higgins, R. W., Shi, W., Yarosh E., and Joyce, R.: 2000, ‘Improved United States Precipitation Quality Control System and Analysis’, NCEP/Climate Prediction Center ATLAS No. 7.
Hirakuchi, H. and Giorgi, F.: 1995, ‘Multi-yr Present Day and 2 xCO2 Simulations of Monsoon Climate over Eastern Asia and Japan with a Regional Climate Model Nested in a General Circulation Model’, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 21105–21126.
Hong, S.-Y. and Leetmaa, A.: 1999, ‘An Evaluation of the NCEP RSM for Regional Climate Modeling’, J. Climate 12, 592–609.
IPCC: 1996, in Houghton J. T. et al. (eds.), The Science of Climate Change. Climate Change 1995, Cambridge University Press, 572 pp.
Ji, Y. and Vernekar, A. D.: 1997, ‘Simulation of the Asian Summer Monsoons of 1987 and 1988 with a Regional Spectral Model Nested in a Global GCM’, J. Climate 10, 1965–1979.
Jones, R. G., Murphy, M. J., Noguer, M., and Keen, A. B.: 1997, ‘Simulation of Climate Change over Europe Using a Nested Regional-Climate Model. II: Comparison of Driving and Regional Model Responses to a Doubling of Carbon Dioxide’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 123, 265–292.
Juang, H.-M. H., Hong, S.-Y., and Kanamitsu, M.: 1997, ‘The NCEP Regional Spectral Model: An Update’, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 78, 2125–2143.
Juang, H.-M. H. and Kanamitsu, M.: 1994, ‘The NMC Nested Regional Spectral Model’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 122, 3–26.
Kalnay, E. and Co-authors: 1996, ‘The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project’, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 437–471.
Kanamitsu, M.: 2000, ‘Latest GSM/RSMSystem. Short Course Lecture’, The 2nd International RSM Workshop, Maui, Hawaii, July 17-21, 2000.
Kanamitsu, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Woollen, J., Yang, S.-K., Hnilo, J., Fiorino, M., and Potter, J.: 2001, ‘NCEP/DOE AMIP-II REANALYSIS (R-2)’, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc., in press.
Leung, L. R. and Ghan, S. J.: 1999a, ‘Pacific Northwest Climate Sensitivity Simulated by a Regional Climate Model Driven by a GCM. Part I: Control Simulations’, J. Climate 12, 2010–2030.
Leung, L. R. and Ghan, S. J.: 1999b, ‘Pacific Northwest Climate Sensitivity Simulated by a Regional Climate Model Driven by a GCM. Part II: 2 xCO2 Simulations’, J. Climate 12, 2031–2053.
Marshall, S., Roads, J. O., and Oglesby, R. J.: 1997, ‘Effects of Resolution and Physics on Precipitation in the NCAR Community Climate Model’, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 19529–19541.
McGregor, J. L. and Walsh, K. J.: 1994, ‘Climate Change Simulations of Tasmanian Precipitation Using Multiple Nestings’, J. Geophys. Res. 99(D10), 20889–20905.
Roads, J. and Chen, S.: 2000, ‘Surface Water and Energy Budgets in the NCEP Regional Spectral Model’, J. Geophys. Res. 104(D24), 29539–29550.
Roads, J., Chen, S.-C., and Kanamitsu, M.: 2002, ‘U.S. Regional Climate Simulations and Seasonal Forecasts’, JGR-Atmospheres, in press.
Roads, J. O., Chen, S.-C., Kanamitsu, M., and Juang, H.: 1999, ‘Surface Water Characteristics in the NCEP Global Spectral Model and Reanalysis’, J. Geophys. Res. 104 (D16), 19307–19327.
Takle, W. J. and Co-authors: 1999, ‘Project to Intercompare Regional Climate Simulations (PIRCS): Description and Initial Results’, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 19443–19461.
Washington, W. M., Weatherly, J. W., Meehl, G. A., Semtner, A. J. Jr., Bettge, T. W., Craig, A. P., Strand, W. G. Jr., Arblaster, J. M., Wayland, V. B., James, R., and Zhang, Y.: 2000, ‘Parallel Climate Model (PCM) Control and Transient Simulations’, Clim. Dyn. 16 (10/11), 755–774.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, J., Roads, J.O. U.S. Climate Sensitivity Simulated with the NCEP Regional Spectral Model. Climatic Change 62, 115–154 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000013675.66917.15
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000013675.66917.15