Skip to main content
Log in

Joint Quantity/Quality Management of Groundwater

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economic literature on groundwater managementhas traditionally been split into two areas: there are papers that evaluate different schemes of dynamicaquifer management, considering that pumping costs vary with stock but ignoring water quality. On the other hand, there are papers that considercontamination problems caused by specificpollutants. This paper presents two alternative models for joint quantity-quality management, and it shows that existing models are in fact special cases of these. The framework isdynamic and considers both the stock of waterquantity and a stock measure of water quality. Optimal taxes are derived, and shown to be different from those in existing quantity-only or quality-only models. Implementationproblems are briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, G., J. Opaluch and W. M. Sullivan (1985)‘Nonpoint Agricultural Pollution: Pesticide Contamination of Groundwater Supplies’American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67, 1238-1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, L. (2001), Control of Water Use in Northwest Portugal, Phd dissertation, Dept. Economics, University of Arizona.

  • Dinar, A. (1994)‘Impact of Energy Cost and Water Resource Availability on Agriculture and Groundwater Quality in California’Resource and Energy Economics 16, 47-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinermann, E. and K. C. Knapp (1983)‘Benefits from Groundwater Management: Magnitude, Sensitivity, and Distribution’American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65, 703-710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gisser, M. and D. A. Sanchez (1980)‘Competition versus Optimal Control in Groundwater Pumping’ Water Resources Research 16, 638-642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, R. C. and D. W. Bromley (1982)‘Agricultural Runoff as a Nonpoint Externality: A Theoretical Development’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64, 547-552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfand, G. (1999)‘Controlling Inputs to Control Pollution: When Will It Work?’ AERE Newsletter 19(2).

  • Helfand, G. and B. House (1995)‘Regulating Nonpoint Source Pollution Under Heterogeneous Conditions’American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77, 1024-1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, D., G. Helfand and B. House (1996)‘Second-Best Tax Policies to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78, 1108-1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letey, J. and A. Dinar (1986)‘Simulated Crop-Water Production Functions for Several Crops when Irrigated with Saline Waters’ Hilgardia 54(1), 1-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapp, H. P., D. J. Bernardo, G. J. Sabbagh, S. Geleta and K. B. Watkins (1994)‘Economic and Environmental Impacts of Limiting Nitrogen Use to Protect Water Quality: A Stochastic Regional Analysis’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76, 889-903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neher, P. (1990), Natural Resource Economics-Conservation and Exploitation, Cambridge University Press.

  • Provencher, B. and O. Burt (1993)‘The Externalities Associated with the Common Property Exploitation of Groundwater’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24, 139-158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provencher, B. (1993)‘A Private Property Rights Regime to Replenish a Groundwater Aquifer’ Land Economics 69(4), 325-340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provencher, B. (1995)‘Issues in the Conjunctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater’ in D. Bromley, ed., The Handbook of Environmental Economics. Blackwell.

  • Roseta-Palma, C. (2002)‘Groundwater Management when Water Quality is Endogenous’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, forthcoming.

  • Rubio, S. (2000), Strategic Behavior and Efficiency in the Common Property Extraction of Groundwater, presented at the Symposium on Water Management-Efficiency, Equity and Policy, at the University of Cyprus, Nicosia, September 22-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerson, K. (1988)‘Uncertainty and Incentives for Nonpoint Pollution Control’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15, 87-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seierstad, A. and K. Sydsaeter (1987), Optimal Control Theory with Economic Applications, North-Holland.

  • Shortle, J. and J. Dunn (1986)‘The Relative Efficiency of Agricultural Source Water Pollution Control Policies’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68, 668-677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickner, S., D. Hoag, W. M. Frasier and J. Ascough II (1998)‘A Dynamic Economic Analysis of Nitrate Leaching in Corn Production under Nonuniform Irrigation Conditions’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80, 397-408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xepapadeas, A. P. (1992)‘Environmental Policy Design and Dynamic Nonpoint-Source Pollution’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 23, 22-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xepapadeas, A. P. (1996)‘Managing Common-access Resources under Production Externalities’ in A. Xepapadeas, ed., Economic Policy for the Environment and Natural Resources. Edward Elgar.

  • Yadav, S. (1997)‘Dynamic Optimization of Nitrogen Use When Groundwater Contamination Is Internalized at the Standard in the Long Run’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79, 931-945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitouni, N. and A. Dinar (1997)‘Mitigating Negative Water Quality and Quality Externalities by Joint Management of Adjacent Aquifers’ Environmental and Resource Economics 9, 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roseta-Palma, C. Joint Quantity/Quality Management of Groundwater. Environ Resource Econ 26, 89–106 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025681520509

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025681520509

Navigation