Skip to main content
Log in

Gender and Video Game Performance

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated potential gender differences in video game (pong) performance in university students. In Experiment 1 men (N = 16) performed significantly better than women (N = 16). Experiment 2 was similar to the first, but used 14 men and 14 women who were matched carefully on previous video game experience. In spite of the matching, results replicated those of the first experiment. In Experiment 3 we evaluated the effect of an audience (male, female, none) on pong performance in 42 men and 42 women. We also assessed trait competition anxiety (Sport Competition Anxiety Test scores), sex role identification (Bem Sex Role Inventory scores), and video game experience. Both genders showed significantly poorer performance when they played pong in the presence of a female audience. Overall, males outperformed females as in the first two experiments. Examination of individuals with low, medium, and high levels of sport competition anxiety and videogame experience reveals persistent gender differences in performance, seemingly independent of levels of anxiety and experience. In all three experiments, both men and women showed significant improvement in performance over trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard, C., Fleury, M., Carriere, L., & Bellec, J. (1981). Components of the coincidence-anticipation behavior of children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 547–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, C. M., & Giroux, J. (1989). Arcade videogames: Proxemic, cognitive and content analyses. Journal of Leisure Research, 21, 92–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. M., Brown, N. L., & Reid, K. (1992). Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 547–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. M., Brown, N. L., Delong, D., & Reid, K. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and videogame performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 691–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, C. B. (1981). Sex of subject, sex of opponent, and opponent ability as factors affecting self-confidence in a competitive situation. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, C. B., & Nix, C. (1979). Sex-typing of physical activities and success predictions of children before and after cross-sex competition. Journal of Sport Psychology, 1, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, N. B. (1972). Social facilitation. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, P. W. (1977). Timing and anticipation: A developmental perspective. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 674–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (1981). Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, J. L., Voloschin, P., Gibb, G. D., & Bailey, J. R. (1983). Differences in eye-hand coordination of video game users and non-users. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 155–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. G. (1990). The effect of performer gender, performer skill level, and opponent gender on self-confidence in a competitive situation. Sex Roles, 23, 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, G. R. J. (1986). Changes in operator efficiency as a function of stress, fatigue, and circadian rhythms. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance. Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyenga, K. B., & Hoyenga, K. T. (1979). The question of sex differences: Psychological, cultural, and biological issues. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyenga, K. B., & Hoyenga, K. T. (1984). Motivational explanations of behavior: Evolutionary, physiological, and cognitive ideas. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huesmann, L. R., Guerra, N. G., Zelli, A., & Miller, L. (1992). Differing normative beliefs about aggression for boys and girls. In K. Bjorkquist & P. Niemele (Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression. Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (1992). Sex differences in the brain. Scientific American, 267, 118–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of children's sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlman, J. S., & Beitel, P. A. (1991). Videogame experience: A possible explanation for differences in anticipation of coincidence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 483–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, D. J., Pellegrino, J. W., & Hunt, E. B. (1993). Comparing the tortoise and the hare: Gender differences and experience in dynamic spatial reasoning tasks. Psychological Science, 4, 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenny, E. (1977). Women's self-confidence in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M. R. (1985). Microcomputers in education: Motivation and social issues. American Psychologist, 40, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1986). A meta-analysis of gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for mathematics and science achievement. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis. Baltimore, MD. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1980). Sex differences in aggression: A rejoinder and reprise. Child Development, 51, 964–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, R. (1977). Sport Competition Anxiety Test. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F. (1987). The role of cognition in sex role acquisition. In D. B. Carter (Ed.), Current conceptions of sex roles and sex typing: Theory and research. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClurg, P. A., & Chaille, C. (1987). Computer games: Environments for developing spatial cognition? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrin, K. A. (1990) Individual differences in real-time information coordination: Relating dynamic spatial and verbal information. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 2, 944–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. K., Alpert, B. S., Willey, E. S., & Somes, G. W. (1988). Cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress in healthy children. Psychophysiology, 25, 144–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nebes, R. D., & Briggs, G. G. (1974). Handedness and the retention of visual material. Cortex, 11, 209–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, D. G., Perry, L., & Boldizar, J. P. (1990). Learning of agression. In M. Lewis & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychopathology. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson-Staveley, K. R., & Cooper, J. (1990). Mere presence, gender and reactions to computers: Studying human-computer interaction in the social context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 168–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, W., & Oldak, R. (1990). Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 303–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sistrunk, F., & McDavid, J. W. (1971). Sex variable in conforming behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 200–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, A., & Jones, G. (1991). Gender role endorsement and competitive anxiety. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 22, 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (1989). Crime in the United States, 1988. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). Nw York: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, A. F., Duncan, S. L., & Schurr, K. T. (1987). The relationship of gender, gender-role endorsement and perceived physical self-efficacy to sport competition anxiety. Journal of Sport Behavior, 11, 192–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, R.M., Hall, L.R., Holtzer, R. et al. Gender and Video Game Performance. Sex Roles 36, 793–812 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025631307585

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025631307585

Keywords

Navigation