Multifunctionality of Active Centers in (Amm)oxidation Catalysts: From Bi–Mo–O _x to Mo–V–Nb–(Te, Sb)–O _x

Abstract

Catalytic centers in selective (allylic) oxidation and ammoxidation catalysts are multimetallic and multifunctional. In the historically important bismuth molybdates, used for propylene (amm)oxidation, they are composed of (Bi³⁺)(Mo⁶⁺)₂ complexes in which the Bi³⁺ site is associated with the α-H abstraction and the (Mo⁶⁺)₂ site with the propylene chemisorption and O or NH insertion. An updated reaction mechanism is presented. In the Mo–V–Nb–Te–O _x systems, three crystalline phases (orthorhombic Mo_7.5V_1.5NbTeO₂₉, pseudohexagonal Mo₆Te₂VO₂₀, and monoclinic TeMo₅O₁₆) were identified, with the orthorhombic phase being the most important one for propane (amm)oxidation. Its active centers contain all necessary key catalytic elements (2V⁵⁺/Mo⁶⁺, 1V⁴⁺/Mo⁵⁺, 2Mo⁶⁺/Mo⁵⁺, 2Te⁴⁺) for this reaction wherein a V⁵⁺ surface site (V⁵⁺ = O ↔ ⁴⁺V^•–O^•) is associated with paraffin activation, a Te⁴⁺ site with α-H abstraction once the olefin has formed, and a (Mo⁶⁺)₂ site with the NH insertion. Four Nb⁵⁺ centers, each surrounded by five molybdenum octahedra, stabilize and structurally isolate the catalytically active centers from each other (site isolation), thereby leading to high selectivity of the desired acrylonitrile product. A detailed reaction mechanism of propane ammoxidation to acrylonitrile is proposed. Combinatorial methodology identified the nominal composition Mo_0.6V_0.187Te_0.14Nb_0.085O _x for maximum acrylonitrile yield from propane, 61.8% (86% conversion, 72% selectivity at 420 °C). We propose that this system, composed of 60% Mo_7.5V_1.5NbTeO₂₉, 40% Mo₆Te₂VO₂₀, and trace TeMo₅O₁₆, functions with a combination of compositional pinning of the optimum orthorhombic Mo_7.5V_1.5±x Nb_1±y Te_1±z O_29±δ phase and symbiotic mop-up of olefin intermediates through phase cooperation. Under mild reaction conditions, a single optimum orthorhombic composition might suffice as the catalyst; under demanding conditions this symbiosis is additionally required. Improvements in catalyst performance could be attained by further optimization of the elemental distributions at the active catalytic center of Mo_7.5V_1.5NbTeO₂₉, by promoter/modifier substitutions, and incorporation of compatible cocatalytic phases (preferably epitaxially matched). High-throughput methods will greatly accelerate the rational catalyst design processes.