Abstract
This paper focuses on an important aspect of presidential debates: the degree to which voters are able to glean candidate information from them. Using an open-ended measure of candidate information, the analysis tests hypotheses concerning the impact of debates on information acquisition among the mass public for all debates from 1976 to 1996. The findings indicate that people do learn from debates and that learning is affected by the context in which the information is encountered. Specifically, early debates generate more learning than do subsequent debates, and the public tends to learn more about candidates with whom they are relatively unfamiliar than about better-known candidates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alvarez, R. Michael (1997). Information and Elections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Bartels, Larry (1988). Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bartels, Larry (1993). Messages received: The political impact of media exposure. American Political Science Review 87: 267–285.
Becker, Lee, Idowu Sobowale, Robin Cobbey, and Chaim Eyal (1978). Debates' effects on voters' understanding of candidates and issues. In George Bishop, Robert Meadow, and Marilyn Jackson-Meadow (eds.), The Presidential Debates. New York: Praeger.
Bennett, Stephen (1988). Know nothings revisited: The meaning of political ignorance today. Social Science Quarterly 68: 476–490.
Bennett, Stephen (1989). Trends in Americans' political information. American Politics Quarterly 17: 422–435
Berelson, Bernard, Paul Lazarsfeld, and William McPhee (1954). Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bishop, George, Robert Oldendick, and Alfred Tuchfarber (1978). The presidential debates as a device for increasing the “rationality” of electoral behavior. In George Bishop, Robert Meadow, and Marilyn Jackson-Meadow (eds.), The Presidential Debates. New York: Praeger.
Brady, Henry, and Richard Johnston (1987). What's the primary message: Horse race or issue journalism? In Gary Orren and Nelson Polsby (eds.), Media and Momentum. Chatham, NJ: Chatam House Publishers.
Campbell, James E., Lynne Cherry, and Kenneth Wink (1992). The convention bump. American Politics Quarterly 20: 287–307.
Chaffee, Steven (1978). Presidential debates—Are they helpful to voters? Communications Monographs 45: 331–346.
Chaffee, Steven, and Jack Dennis (1979). Presidential debates: An assessment. In Austin Ranney (ed.), The Past and Future of Presidential Debates. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
Converse, Philip (1962). Information flow and the stability of partisan attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26: 578–599.
DeSart, Jay (1995). Information processing and party neutrality: A reexamination of the party decline thesis. Journal of Politics 57: 776–795.
Donohue, George, Clarice Olien, and Phillip Tichenor (1987). Media access and knowledge gaps. Critical Studies in Mass Communications 4: 87–92.
Drew, Dan, and David Weaver (1991). Voter learning in the 1988 presidential election: Did the debates matter? Journalism Quarterly 68: 27–37.
Finkel, Steven (1993). Reexamining the “minimal effects” model in recent presidential elections. Journal of Politics 55: 1–21.
Gaziano, Cecilie (1983). The knowledge gap: An analytical review of media effects. Communication Research 10: 447–486.
Geer, John G. (1988). The effects of presidential debates on the electorate's preferences for candidates. American Politics Quarterly 16: 486–501.
Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King (1993). Why are American presidential election polls so variable when votes are so predictable? British Journal of Political Science 23: 409–451.
Hastie, Reid, and Bernadette Park (1986). The relationship between memory and judgement depends upon whether the judgement task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review 93: 258–268.
Holbrook, Thomas M. (1996). Do Campaigns Matter? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and David S. Birdsell (1988). Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kraus, Sidney (1979). The Great Debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Lanoue, David J. (1991). The “turning point”: Viewers' reactions to the second 1988 presidential debate. American Politics Quarterly 19: 80–95.
Lanoue, David (1992). One that made a difference: Cognitive consistency, political knowledge, and the 1980 presidential debate. Public Opinion Quarterly 56: 168–184.
Lanoue, David, and Peter Schrott (1991). The Joint Press Conference. New York: Greenwood Press.
Lau, Richard (1986). Political schemata, candidate, evaluations, and voting behavior. In Richard Lau and David Sears (eds.), Political Cognition. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
Lau, Richard R. (1995). Information search during an election campaign: Introducing a processing-tracing methodology for political scientists. In Milton Lodge and Kathleen McGraw (eds.), Political Judgement: Structure and Process. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lemert, James (1993). Do televised presidential debates help inform voters? Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 37: 83–94.
Lemert, James, William Elliot, James Bernstein, William Rosenberg, and Karl Nestvold (1991). News Verdicts, the Debates, and Presidential Campaigns. New York: Praeger.
Lenart, Silvo (1994). Shaping Political Attitudes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lodge, Milton, and Patrick Stroh (1993). Inside the mental voting booth: An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. In Shanto Iengar and William J. McGuire (eds.), Explorations in Political Psychology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Lodge, Milton, Kathleen McGraw, and Patrick Stroh (1989). An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review 87: 399–419.
Lodge, Milton, Marco Steenbergen, and Shawn Brau (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review 89: 309–326.
Luskin, Robert (1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior 31: 856–899.
Miller, Arthur, and Michael MacKuen (1979). Informing the electorate: A national study. In Sidney Kraus (ed.), The Great Debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Patterson, Thomas (1980). The Mass Media Election. New York: Praeger.
Popkin, Samuel (1991). The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rahn, Wendy, Jon Krosnick, and Marijke Breuning (1994). Rationalization and derivation process in survey studies of candidate evaluations. American Journal of Political Science 38: 582–600.
Sears, David, and Steven Chaffee (1979). Uses and effects of the 1976 debates: An overview of empirical studies. In Sidney Kraus (ed.), The Great Debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Shaw, Daron (1995). Strong persuasion? The effect of campaigns in U.S. presidential elections. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Shelley, Mack C. II, and Hwang-Du Hwang (1991). The mass media and public opinion polls in the 1988 presidential election. American Politics Quarterly 19: 59–79.
Smith, Eric R. A. N. (1989). The Unchanging American Voter. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Tichenor, P. J., G. A. Donohue, and C. N. Olien (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, Summer, pp. 159–170.
Weaver, David, and Dan Drew (1995). Voter learning in the 1992 presidential election: Did the “nontraditional” media and debates matter? Journalism and Mass Communications Quarterly 72: 7–17.
Zaller, John (1989). Bringing converse back in: Information flow in political campaigns. Political Analysis 1: 181–234.
Zaller, John (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller, John, and Vincent Price (1993). Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their implications for research. Public Opinion Quarterly 57: 133–164.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holbrook, T.M. Political Learning from Presidential Debates. Political Behavior 21, 67–89 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023348513570
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023348513570