Abstract
Hilary Putnam has offered two arguments to show that we cannotbe brains in a vat, and one to show that our cognitive situationcannot be fully analogous to that of brains in a vat. The latterand one of the former are irreparably flawed by misapplicationsof, or mistaken inferences from, his semantic externalism; thethird yields only a simple logical truth. The metaphysical realismthat is Putnam’s ultimate target is perfectly consistent withsemantic externalism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnsen, B.C. Of Brains in Vats, Whatever Brains in Vats May Be. Philosophical Studies 112, 225–249 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023075527458
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023075527458