Skip to main content
Log in

Product Durability and Extended Producer Responsibility in Solid Waste Management

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a vintage durable good model, this paper investigates how extended producer responsibility (EPR) in waste management influences product durability and welfare. Four EPR instruments are discussed and compared with the benchmark in which producers do not receive price signals for waste disposal. In each case, EPR induces durability to increase. Under perfect competition the welfare change caused by EPR is unambiguously positive and one EPR instrument is even capable of implementing the first-best welfare optimum. In contrast, under imperfect competition EPR may lead to a welfare reduction. The analysis also compares EPR to non-EPR measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, A.B. (1983),'Market Structure and the Durability of Goods', Review of Economic Studies 50, 625-637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, L.M. and R.J. Deneckere (1987),'One is Almost Enough for Monopoly', Rand Journal of Economics 18, 255-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, L.M. and R.J. Deneckere (1989),'Reputation in Bargaining and Durable Goods Monopoly', Econometrica 57, 511-531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, A. and J. Lawlor (1997),'Questioning the Waste Hierarchy: The Case of a Region with a Low Population Density', Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 40, 19-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, J. (1986),'A Theory of Planned Obsolescence', Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 729-749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butz, D.A. (1990),'Durable Good Monopoly and Best-Price Provisions', American Economic Review 80, 1062-1076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calcott, P. and M. Walls (2000),'Can Downstream Waste Disposal Policies Encourage Upstream “Design for Environment” ', American Economic Review 90, 233-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choe, C. and I. Fraser (1999),'An Economic Analysis of Household Waste Management', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38, 234-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1986),'Comparative Statics for Oligopoly', International Economic Review 27, 107-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichner, T. and R. Pethig (2001),'Product Design and Efficient Management of Recycling and Waste Treatment', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41, 109-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fershtman, C., Kamien, M.I. and E.Muller (1992),'Integral Games: Theory and Applications', in G. Feichtinger, ed., Dynamic Economic Models and Optimal Control. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 297-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D. (1997),'Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation: A Comment', American Economic Review 87, 245-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D. and T.C. Kinnaman (1995),'Garbage, Recycling and Illicit Burning', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, 78-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D. and T.C. Kinnaman (1996),'Household Responses to Pricing Garbage by the Bag', American Economic Review 86, 971-984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D. and W. Wu (1998),'Policies for Green Design', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, 131-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goering, G.E. and J.R. Boyce (1999),'Emissions Taxation in Durable Goods Oligopoly', Journal of Industrial Economics 47, 125-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golub, J. (Ed.) (1998), New Instruments for Environmental Policy in the EU. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendel, I. and A. Lizerri (1999),'Interfering with Secondary Markets', Rand Journal of Economics 30, 1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huhtala, A. (1999),'How Much do Money, Inconvenience and Pollution Matter? Analysing Households' Demand for Large-Scale Recycling and Incineration', Journal of Environmental Management 55, 27-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R.R. (1993), The Economics of SolidWaste Reduction: The Impact of User Fees. Hampshire, U.K.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M.I. and E. Muller (1976),'Optimal Control with Integral State Equation', Review of Economic Studies 43, 469-473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidgren, K. and G. Skogh (1996),'Extended Producer Responsibility: Recycling, Liability, and Guarantee Funds', The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 21, 170-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis, P. (1995),'Product Stewardship, Waste Minimization and Economic Efficiency: Lessons from Germany', Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 38, 231-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1982), Product Durability and Product Life Extension: Their Contribution to Solid Waste management. Paris.

  • OECD (1998), Extended and Shared Producer Responsibility: Phase 2-Framework Report. Paris.

  • Palmer, K. and M. Walls (1999),'Extended Product Responsibility: An Economic Assessment of Alternative Policies', Discussion Paper 99-12, Resources for the Future, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousso, A.D. and P. Shah (1994),'Packaging Taxes and Recycling Incentives: The German Green Dot Program', National Tax Journal 47, 689-701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. (1979),'Market Structure, Durability and Quality: A Selective Survey', Economic Inquiry 17, 177-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieper, E. and P.L. Swan (1973),'Monopoly and Competition in the Market of Durable Goods', Review of Economic Studies 40, 333-351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahel, W. (1997),'Die Langlebigkeit von Produkten gegen “Ex und Hopp” ', in H. Schaufler, ed., Umwelt und Verkehr: Beiträge für eine nachhaltige Politik. München: Aktuell, pp. 115-125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Runkel, M. Product Durability and Extended Producer Responsibility in Solid Waste Management. Environmental and Resource Economics 24, 161–182 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022800206337

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022800206337

Navigation