Abstract
What does the law demand when it requirescitizens to conform to standards ofreasonableness? I propose and defend theview that the law should demand thatcitizens conform their behavior to someactual conduct in society. I contrast thisidea against what might be called the``empty vessel'' view of reasonableness,where the standard is understood tofunction like an empty vessel in the law,allowing courts to use various norms andmoral judgments to determine what seemsreasonable in the circumstances. Theempty vessel account is the more commonapproach for understanding reasonableness,but it leaves obscure whether and howassessments about appropriate conductconnect with facts about citizens' actualconduct. I argue for a ``binocular'' viewthat focuses our attention on actualpractices and thereby establishes howthese standards provide a stable guide toconduct and support the rule of law.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abraham, K. S., 'Symposium: The Trouble with Negligence', Vanderbilt Law Review 54 (2001): 1187–1223.
Adler, R. S. and E. R. Peirce, 'The Legal, Ethical, and Social Implications of the “Reasonable Woman” Standard in Sexual Harassment Cases', Fordham Law Review 61 (1993): 773–827.
Alpert, G. P. and W. C. Smith, 'Criminology: How Reasonable is the “Reasonable Man”?: Police and Excessive Force', Journal of Criminal Law 85 (1994): 481–501.
Barry, B., Justice as Impartiality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).
Cahn, N. R., 'Symposium: The Looseness of Legal Language: The Reasonable Woman Standard in Theory and Practice', Cornell Law Review 77 (1992): 1398–1446.
Calabresi, G., Ideals, Beliefs, Attitudes, and the Law: Private Law Perspectives on a Public Law Problem (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1985).
Coleman, J. L., The Practice of Principle: in Defense of a Pragmatic Approach to Legal Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).
Coleman, J. and A. Ripstein, 'Mischief and Misfortune', McGill Law Journal 91 (1995): 91–130.
Coleman, J., Risks and Wrongs (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
Collins, R. K. L., “Language, History and the Legal Process: A Profile of the “Reasonable Man”', Camden Law Journal 8(1977): 311–323.
Discussion Draft of Restatement Third, Torts: General Principles (Philadelphia: The American Law Institute, 1999).
Dolkart, J. L., 'Hostile Environment Harassment: Equality, Objectivity, and the Shaping of Legal Standards', Emory Law Journal (Winter) (1994): 151–245.
Dressler, J., 'When “Heterosexual” Men Kill 'Homosexual' Men: Reflections on Provocation Law, Sexual Advances, and the “Reasonable Man” Standard', Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (Winter) (1995): 726–763.
Dworkin, R. M. Law's Empire (Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1986).
Dworkin, R. M., “The Model of Rules”, in R. S. Summers (ed.), Essays in Legal Philosophy (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967). pp. 25–60.
Ehrenreich, N. S., 'Pluralist Myths and Powerless Men: The Ideology of Reasonableness in Sexual Harassment Law', Yale Law Journal (April) (1990): 1177–1234.
Epstein, R., 'A Theory of Strict Liability', Journal of Legal Studies 2 (1973).
Feldman, H. L., 'Prudence, Benevolence, and Negligence: Virtue, Ethics and Tort Law', Chicago-Kent Law Review 74 (2000): 1431–1465.
Fletcher, G. P., A Crime of Self-Defense: Bernard Goetz and the Law on Trial (New York: Free Press, 1988).
Fletcher, G. P., 'The Search for Synthesis in Tort Theory', Law and Philosophy 2 (1983): 63–88.
Fuller, L. L., The Morality of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969).
Gilles, S. G., 'On Determining Negligence: Hand Formula Balancing, the Reasonable Person Standard, and the Jury', Vanderbilt Law Review 54 (2001): 813–861.
Green, M. D., 'Negligence = Efficiency: Doubts', Texas Law Review 75 (1997): 1605–1643.
Greenawalt, K., Law and Objectivity (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).
Harper, F. V.and J. Fleming Jr., The Law of Torts (Boston: Little, Brown, 1956).
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961).
Hart, H. L. A, Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Clarendon, 1968).
Hastie, R. et al., Inside the Jury (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983).
Hayden, P. T., 'Cultural Norms as Law: Tort Law's “Reasonable Person” Standard of Care', Journal of American Culture (1992): 45–55.
Henderson, J. A., “Expanding the Negligence Concept: Retreat from the Rule of Law”, Indiana Law Journal 51 (1976): 468–527.
Hetcher, S., 'Non-Utilitarian Negligence Norms and the Reasonable Person Standard', Vanderbilt Law Review 54 (2001): 863–892.
Holmes, O. W., The Common Law (Boston: Little, Brown, 1881).
Honoré, T., 'Responsibility and Luck', The Law Quarterly Review 104 (1988): 530–553.
Honoré, T., Responsibility and Fault (Oxford: Hart, 1999).
Hubin, D. C. and K. Haely, 'Rape and the Reasonable Man', Law and Philosophy 18(2) (1999): 113–139.
Kadish, S. H. and S. J. Schulhofer, Criminal Law and its Processes, 5th edn. (Boston: Little, Brown, 1989).
Kelley, P. and L. Wendt, 'Symposium on Negligence in the Courts: The Actual Practice: What Judges Tell Juries about Negligence: A review of Pattern Jury Instructions', Chicago-Kent Law Review 77 (2002): 587–623.
Kelley, P., 'Symposium: Restating Duty, Breach, and Proximate Cause in Negligence Law: Descriptive Theory and the Rule of Law', Vanderbilt Law Review 54 (2001): 1039–1070.
Kelley, P., 'Teaching Torts: The Carroll Towing Case and the Teaching of Tort Law', Saint Louis University Law Journal 45 (2001): 731–758.
Kelley, P., 'Who Decides? Community Safety Conventions at the Heart of Tort Liability', Cleveland State Law Review 38 (1990): 316–390.
Kelman, M., “Reasonable Evidence of Reasonableness”, Critical Inquiry (Summer) (1991): 798–817.
Klis, D. A., 'Reforms to Criminal Defense Instruction: New Patterned Jury Instructions which Account for the Experience of the Battered Woman who Kills Her Battering Mate', Golden State University Law Review Spring (1994): 131–167.
Landes, W. M. and R. Posner, The Economic Structure of Tort Law (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987).
Larmore, C., 'Pluralism and Reasonable Disagreement', Social Philosophy and Policy 11 (1994): 61–79.
Mison, R. B., 'Comment, Homophobia in Manslaughter: The Homosexual Advance as Insufficient Provocation', California Law Review 80 (1992): 133–178.
McCormick, N., 'Propter Honoris Respectum: Reasonableness and Objectivity', Notre Dame Law Review 74 (1999): 1575–1603.
McGregor, J., 'Force, Consent, and the Reasonable Woman', in J. L. Coleman and A. Buchanan (eds.), In Harm's Way: Essays in Honor of Joel Feinberg (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994).
Nagel, T., 'Moral Conflict and Political Legitimacy', Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (1987).
Owen, D. G., 'Philosophical Foundation of Fault in Tort Law', in Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).
Perry, S. R., 'Symposium: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Negligence Standard', Vanderbilt Law Review 54 (2001): 893–898.
Peterson, L. L., 'The Reasonableness of the Reasonable Woman Standard', Public Affairs Quarterly 13(2) (1999): 141–158.
Posner, R. A., Economics Analysis of Law (Boston: Little, Brown, 1973).
Prosser, W. L. and J. W. Wade, Cases and Materials on Torts (Mineola: Foundation Press, 1971).
Prosser, W. L., The Handbook of the Law of Torts, 2nd edn. (St. Paul: West Publishing: 1955).
Rawls, J., Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971).
Reynolds, O. M. Jr., 'The Reasonable Man of Negligence Law: A Health Report on the “Odious Creature”', Oklahoma Law Review 23 (1970): 410–430.
Robinson, P. H. and J. M. Darley, Justice, Liability, Blame: Community Views and the Criminal Law (Boulder: Westview Press, 1995).
Sachs, B. I., 'Case Note: Whose Reasonableness Counts?', Yale Law Journal 107 (1998): 1523–1528.
Saltman, M., The Demise of the 'Reasonable Man': A Cross-Cultural Study of a Legal Concept (New Brunswick: Transaction Press, 1991).
Scalet, S., 'Liberalism, Skepticism, and Neutrality: Making Do Without Doubt', Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (2000): 207–225.
Scanlon, T. M., 'Contractualism and Utilitarianism', in A. Sen and B. Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).
Seavey, W. A., 'Negligence - Subjective or Objective', Harvard Law Review (November) 1927: 1–28.
Shavell, S., Economic Analysis of Accident Law (Cambridge: Harvard, 1987).
Simons, K. W., 'Symposium: The Hand Formula in the Draft Restatement (Third) of Torts: Encompassing Fairness as Well as Efficiency Values', Vanderbilt Law Review 54 (2001): 901–938.
Tentative Draft of Restatement Third, Torts: Liability for Physical Harm (Basic Principles) (Philadelphia: The American Law Institute, 2001).
Unikel, R., 'Reasonable Doubts: A Critique of the Reasonable Woman Standard in American Jurisprudence', Northwestern University Law Review (Fall) 1992: 326–375.
Wells, M., 'Scientific Policymaking and the Torts Revolution: The Revenge of the Ordinary Observer', Georgia Law Review 26 (1992): 725–756.
Weinrib, E. J., The Idea of Private Law (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995).
Williams, Glanville, Criminal Law: the General Part, 2nd edn. (London: Stevens, 1961).
Wright, R. W., 'The Standards of Care in Negligence Law', in Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scalet, S.P. Fitting the People They are Meant to Serve: Reasonable Persons in the American Legal System. Law and Philosophy 22, 75–110 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022540824518
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022540824518