Abstract
According to a variety of tests, What John likes is himself displays the same c-command relations as John likes himself. But none of these relations appears to hold on the surface; this is the 'connectivity problem'. Revisionists maintain that the problematic examples are identity sentences with no hidden structure, but that none of our c-command tests is infallible. Conservatives claim that our c-command tests are reliable, but that the clause John likes himself is indeed present at some level of representation. Siding with the Conservatives, we follow Ross's (1972) original insight and suggest that connectivity sentences equate a concealed question with an elided answer: [What John likes]= [ John likes himself]. New arguments are given for each component of the analysis, and it is shown that connectivity effects are obviated when the elements that are equated are referential rather than clausal. The correct truth-conditions are derived from the semantics of identity, together with Groenendijk and Stokhof's (1990) semantics for questions. The analysis is then extended to cases of DP connectivity, such as His worry is himself, by suggesting that semantically dyadic nouns have an additional argument position, yielding the representation: [?x his [worry x]]=[ his [worry himself]]. Finally, it is shown that recent objections based on ‘anti-connectivity’ effects misfire, because the same facts hold of question-answer pairs, as is expected on the present approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akmajian, Adrian. 1970. ‘On Deriving Cleft Sentences from Pseudo-Cleft Sentences’, Linguistic Inquiry 1, 149–168.
Alexiadou, Artemis and Anastasia Giannakidou. 1999. ‘Specificational Pseudoclefts as Lists’, in K. Shahin, S. Blake and E.-S. Kim (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI, Stanford Publications, pp. 1–16.
Beck, Sigrid and Hotze Rullmann. 1999. ‘A Flexible Approach to Exhaustivity in Questions’, Natural Language Semantics 7, 249–298.
Cecchetto, Carlo. 2000. ‘Connectivity and Anti-Connectivity in Pseudoclefts’, in Proceedings of NELS 30, GLSA, Amherst, Massachusetts, pp. 137–151.
Cecchetto, Carlo. 2001. ‘Syntactic or Semantic Reconstruction? Evidence from Pseudoclefts and Clitic Left Dislocation’, in C. Cecchetto, G. Chierchia and M. T. Guasti (eds.), Semantic Interfaces, CSLI, Stanford, California, pp. 90–144.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1993. ‘Questions with Quantifiers’, Natural Language Semantics 1, 181–234.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2000. ‘Scalar Implicatures, Polarity Phenomena, and the Syntax/ Pragmatics Interface’, unpublished manuscript, University of Milan.
Den Dikken, Marcel, André Meinunger and Chris Wilder. 2000. ‘Pseudoclefts and Ellipsis’, Studia Linguistica 54, 41–89 (already circulated as draft in 1998).
Eisner, Jason. 1995. ‘Quantifier Connectedness in Pseudoclefts’, unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.
Faraci, Robert. 1971. ‘The Deep Question of Pseudo-clefts’, English Linguistics 6, 48–85.
Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof. 1990. ‘Partitioning Logical Space’, annotated handout, Second European Summerschool in Logic, Language and Information, Leuven, August 1990.
Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof. 1997. ‘Questions’, in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, pp. 1055–1124.
Guéron, Jacqueline. 1992. ‘Types syntaxiques et types sémantiques: la phrase copulative comme palimpseste’, Revue québécoise de linguistique 22, 77–115.
Hamblin, Charles L. 1973. ‘Questions in Montague English’, Foundations of Language 10, 41–53.
Heim, Irene. 1979. ‘Concealed Questions’, in R. Bäuerle, U. Egli and A. von Stechow (eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View, Springer, Berlin, pp. 51–60.
Heim, Irene. 1994. ‘Interrogative Complements of “Know”’, in R. Buchalla and Anita Mittwoch (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference and the Workshop on Discourse, Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics (IATL1), pp. 128–144.
Heim, Irene and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar, Blackwell, Oxford.
Heycock, Caroline and Anthony Kroch. 1999. ‘Pseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF Interface Level’, Linguistic Inquiry 30(3), 365–397.
Higgins, Francis R. 1976. The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English. Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Hirschbühler, Paul and Maria Luisa Rivero. 1983. ‘Non-matching Concealed Questions in Catalan and Spanish and the Projection Principle’, The Linguistic Review 2, 331–363.
Izvorski, Roumyana. 1997. ‘On the Type of “Be” and on the Nature of the Wh-Clause in Specificational Sentences’, handout, ZAS, Berlin, November 1997.
Jacobson, Pauline. 1994. ‘Binding Connectivity in Copular Sentences’, in M. Harvey and L. Santelmann (eds.), Proceedings of SALT IV, Ithaca, New York, Cornell University, pp. 161–178.
Kaplan, David. 1969. ‘Quantifying In’, in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (eds.), Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 178–214.
Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. ‘The Syntax and Semantics of Questions’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3–44.
Meinunger, André. 1997. ‘A Monoclausal Structure for (Pseudo-)cleft Sentences’, NELS handout.
Moro, Andrea. 1997. The Raising of Predicates, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Partee, Barbara. 1986. ‘Ambiguous Pseudoclefts with Unambiguous Be’, in S. Berman, J.-W. Choe, and J. McDonough (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 16, pp. 354–366.
Quine, Willard V. 1956. ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, Journal of Philosophy 53, 177–187.
Ross, John R. 1972. ‘Act’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 70–126.
Ross, John R. 1985. ‘The Source of Pseudocleft Sentences’, handout of a talk given at New York University, November 1985.
Ross, John R. 1997. ‘That Is the Question’, paper presented at the University of Pennsylvania, November 1997.
Ross, John R. 2000. ‘The Frozenness of Pseudoclefts - Towards an Inequality-based Syntax’, in John P. Boyle and Arika Okrent (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 385–426.
Ross, John R. 2001. ‘Inversion and Coreference in Pseudoclefts’, unpublished manuscript, University of North Texas.
Roubaud, Marie-Noëlle. 2000. Les Constructions Pseudo-Clivées en Français Contemporain, Honoré Champion Éditeur.
Schlenker, Philippe. 1998. ‘Pseudocleft Connectivity and the Structure of Noun Phrases’, unpublished manuscript, MIT.
Sharvit, Yael. 1999. ‘Connectivity in Specificational Sentences’, Natural Language Semantics 7, 299–304.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlenker, P. Clausal Equations (A Note on the Connectivity Problem). Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21, 157–214 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021843427276
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021843427276