Skip to main content
Log in

Communicology and Narcissism: Disciplines of the Heart

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies

Abstract

The human science of Communicology is a postmodern discipline by which we may better understand narcissism. In this study, semiotic phenomenology is employed as a paradigm exemplar of Communicology. Richard L. Lanigan's description of language as an analogue code is used as a vehicle to discuss the discourse of narcissism from three interrelated perspectives: first as sociology, second as a psychology, and third as Communicology. These are, respectively: normative, psychoanalytic, and phenomenological discourses, each a distinct disciplining of narcissism. A semiotic phenomenology of the discourse on narcissism reveals the value of reinterpreting the myth of Narcissus, broadening the analysis to include a psychological perspective but without being limited to it. An interdisciplinary perspective focused on discourse conceives narcissism within the larger cultural, social, and personal matrix. On this wider horizon, consciousness is understood to be semiotic and experience phenomenological. That is to say, semiosis (the action of signs in discourse) is argued to be thematic of consciousness while the possibility of communication is continuously problematic for experience. As an analogue code, language is shown to be a synergy of three modes of being: logos, pathos, and ethos. These, in turn, are realized in language use, that is, only in discourse. Ethosis simultaneous with communicative praxis, and narcissism is exemplary of this. Heuristic and therapeutic implications of this interpretation of narcissism are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barrett, W. (1979). The illusion of technique. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1992). Intimations of postmodernity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, D. (1984). Is that all there is? New York: Poseidon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrera, A. (1998). Consequences of unlimited semiosis: Carlo Sini’s metaphysics of the sign and semiotical hermeneutics. In H. J. Silverman (Ed.) Cultural semiosis:Tracing the signifier (pp. 48–62). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catt, I. (1982). An existential phenomenological interpretation of narcissism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catt, I. (1986). Rhetoric and narcissism. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 50, 242–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catt, I. (1988). Narcissism as interpersonal communication: Theoretical implications. Journal of Communication Therapy, 4, 151–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catt, I. & Porter, M. (1995a). The narcissistic reflection of communicative power. In D. Mumby (Ed.) Narrative and social control (pp. 164–185). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catt, I. (1995b). The cash-value of communication: An interpretation of William James. In A. Smith & L. Langsdorf (Eds.), Recovering pragmatism’s voice. (pp. 97–114 ). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catt, I. (2000).The institution of communitarianism and the communicology of Pierre Bourdieu. The American Journal of Semiotics, 15 and 16, (1–4), 187–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. & Taylor, L. (1978). Escape attempts. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colapietro, V. (1989). Peirce’s approach to the self:Asemiotic perspective on human subjectivity. Albany, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, B. (1996). Harry Stack Sullivan: Interpersonal theory and psychotherapy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiscalini, J. & Grey, A.L. (Eds.) (1993). Narcissism and the interpersonal self. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1962). On narcissism: An introduction. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.) The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1963). The theory of the libido: narcissism. A general introduction to psychoanalysis. New York: Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1974). The hidden human image. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, C. (1980). In defence of narcissism. New York: Gardener.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harre, R. and Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1991[1950]). Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. (Dorion Cairns, Trans.). London: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, R. (1975). Social amnesia. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jager, B. (1991). Psychology in a postmodern era. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 22,(1), 60–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, G. (1993). Crossroads between culture and mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. (1990). On language. Linda R. Waugh and Monique Monville-Burston (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1974). Further contributions to the treatment of narcissistic personalities. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 55,(2), 215–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1978, June). Why some people can’t love. Psychology Today, 54–59.

  • Kim, K. (1996). Caged in our own signs. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1966). Forms and transformations of narcissism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 14,(2), 243–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovel, J. (1981). The age of desire. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanigan, R. L. (1988). Phenomenology of communication: Merleau-Ponty’s thematics in communicology and semiology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanigan, R. L. (1992). The human science of communicology: A phenomenology of discourse in Foucault and Merleau-Ponty. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanigan, R. L. (1994). Capta versus data: Method and evidence in communicology. Human Studies, 17, 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanigan, R. L. (1994 [1998]). The postmodern ground of communciology: Subverting the forgetfulness of rationality in language. The American Journal of Semiotics, 11, (3–4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanigan, R. (2000). The self in semiotic phenomenology: Consciousness as the conjunction of perception and expression in the science of communicology. The American Journal of Semiotics, 15 and 16, 91–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1978). The culture of narcissism. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1984). The minimal self. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A. (1980). When dreams and heroes died. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, P. (1975, October). The new narcissism. Harper’s Magazine. 45–56.

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.) London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, F. (1995). Semiosis in the postmodern age. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J. (1996). Beyond the psychoanalytic dyad: Developmental semiotics in Freud, Peirce and Lacan. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J. (2000). Hierarchical models in semiotics and psychoanalysis. Peirce, semiotics, and psychoanalysis. John Muller and Joseph Brent (Eds.) Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narr, W. (1980). The selling of narcissism. Dialectical anthropology, 5, 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovid. (1898). Metamorphoses Book III, (H. T. Riley, Trans.) London: George Bell and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1931-35 & 1958). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. Burks (Eds.) (8 vols.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restak, R. (1982). The self-seekers. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud & philosophy: An essay on interpretation. (Denis Savage Trans.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, M. (1973). Phenomenology, language, and the social sciences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, A. (1980). Psychoanalytic paradigms and their narcissistic investment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2, 385–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruesch, J. & Bateson, G. (1951). Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sappenfield, B. (1976). Belief in the omnipotence of love. Psychological Reports, 38, 399–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, R. (1983). The analytic attitude. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnall, M. (1981). Limits. New York: Clarkson Potter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrag, C. (1986). Communicative praxis and the space of subjectivity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1976). The fall of public man (Rev. ed.). New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A. and Levine, R. A. (1984). Culture theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sini, C. (1993). Images ofTruth:From sign to symbol (M.Verdicchio,Trans.). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P. (1974). Earthwalk. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, D. (1982). Narrative truth and historical truth. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, A. (1979). Me: The narcissistic American. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, R., Atwood, G. & Brandchaft, B. ). (Eds.) (1994). The intersubjective perspective. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitz, P. (1977). Psychology as religion. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachtel, P. (1983). The poverty of affluence. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. Beavin, J. and Jackson, D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilden, A. (1987). The rules are no game. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, T. (1976, August). The me decade and the third great awakening. New York Magazine. 26–40.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isaac E. Catt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Catt, I.E. Communicology and Narcissism: Disciplines of the Heart. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies 4, 389–411 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020332013269

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020332013269

Navigation