Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Civil society has been considered pivotal to democracy, but the causes of its performance have remained controversial. According to one view the political context is a critical factor in shaping the contours of civil society. Another suggests that whether democracy prevails is contingent on society itself and the associations comprising it. In a test of these views it was assumed that if society prevails associations would vary by type. If the state is more important, then associations would be expected to score similarly on the democratic scale. It was also expected that variation among the types of performance would cut across group categories, reflecting general attributes of the polity. Data were derived from a survey conducted among voluntary associations in Israel (n = 360). Findings showed that (a) associations scored similarly on the democratic scale, (b) the scores for the democratic performance were not influenced by group category, and (c) the least performed function was integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ahrne, G. (1998). Civil society and uncivil organizations. In: Alexander, J. C. (ed.), Real Civil Societies: Dilemmas of Institutionalization, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basok, M. (2001). A striking rise in public expenditure to 54.4 percent of the Gross Domestic Income. Haaretz, August 22.

  • Bella, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., and Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Eliezer, U. (1999). Is civil society emerging in Israel? Politics and identity in the new associations. Israel Sociol. 1(2): 51-98 (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., and Neuhaus, R. J. (1996). To Empower People: From State to Civil Society, AEI Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. M. (1977). Lobbying for the People: The Political Behavior of Public Interest Groups, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J. A., and Richard, P. B. (1998). Civil society and political context in Central America. Am. Behav. Sci. 42(2): 33-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, P., Einwohner, R. L., and Hollander, J. A. (1995). The success of political movements: A bargaining perspective. In: Craig Jenkins, J., and Klandermans, B. (eds.), The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., and Susser, B. (2000). Israel and the Politics of Jewish Identity, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (1994). Rethinking civil society: Toward democratic consolidation. J. Democracy 5: 5-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowse, R., and Hughes, J. (1977). Sporadic interventionists. Polit. Stud. 25: 84-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. (1996). Political inclusion and the dynamics of democratization. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 90: 475-487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elazar, D. J. (1975). The local elections: Sharpening the trend toward territorial democracy. In: Arian, A. (ed.), The Elections in Israel 1973, Jerusalem, Academic Press, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elazar, D. J. (1986). Israel: Building a New Society, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M. W., and Edwards, B. (1996). The paradox of civil society. J. Democracy 7: 38-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Q. 22: 7-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidron, B. (1995). Mapping the Third Sector in Israel: Research Findings, Ben Gurion University, Beersheba, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidron, B., Katz, H., and Bar, M. (2000). The Third Sector in Israel 2000: The Sector's Duties (in Hebrew), Ben Gurion University, Beersheba, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W. (1998). Pressure Groups. Politics and Democracy in Britain, Philip Allan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1971). Exit, Voice and Loyalty, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyden, G. (1998). Civil society, social capital, and development: Dissection of a complex discourse. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 32(1): 3-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilan, S. (1999). On the road to civil rebellion. Haaretz, February 10.

  • Keane, J. (ed.) (1988). Civil Society and the State, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman-Wilzig, S. N. (1990). Stiff-Necked People, Bottle-Necked System: The Evolution and Roots of Israeli Public Protest, 1949–1986, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch, G. (1984). Interest intermediation in capitalist and socialist systems: Some structural and functional perspectives in comparative research. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 4: 153-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (1996). Social and unsocial capital: A review essay on Robert Putnam's “Making Democracy Work.” Polit. Soc. 24(1): 45-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. (1977). Politics and Markets: The World's Political Economic Systems, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics, Doubleday, Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, W. A., Smith, G., and Stoker, G. (2000). Social capital and associational life. In: Baron, S., Field, J., and Scholler, T. (eds.), Social Capital: Critical Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, R. (1962[1915]). Political Parties, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkoff, D. C. (1997). Producing social capital: National and social movements and civil society. Am. Behav. Sci. 40(5): 606-618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (2002). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. Int. Polit. Sci. Assoc. 22: 201-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nir, U. (2001). Leadership reluctant to demonstrate: Youngsters want action. Haaretz, September 11.

  • Olson, M. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedahzur, A., and Yishai, Y. (1999). Hatred by hated people: Xenophobia in Israel. Stud. Conflict Terrorism 22: 101-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelczynsky, Z. (1988). Solidarity and the rebirth of civil society. In: Keane, J. (ed.), Civil Society and the State, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petracca, M. (1992). Introduction. In: Petracca, M. (ed.), The Politics of Interests: Interest Groups Transformed, Westview, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R., Mishler, W., and Haerpfer, C. (1987). Social capital in civic and stressful societies. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 32: 85-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L., and Anheier, H. (1994). The Emerging Sector: An Overview, The Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlumberger, O. (2000). The Arab Middle East and the question of democratization: Some critical remarks. Democratization 7(4): 104-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligson, A. L. (1999). Civil association and democratic participation in Central America: A test for the Putnam thesis. Comp. Polit. Stud. 32: 342-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalev, H. (2000). Deep hatred toward the Arabs: Confrontation with the orthodox will lead to violence. Haaretz, September 29.

  • Shalev, H. (2001). A bad spirit. Maariv, September 14.

  • Shelah, O. (2002). The Hebrew rebels' movement. Yediot Ahronot, May 10.

  • Stolle, D., and Rochon, T. (1998). Are all associations alike? Member diversity, associational type, and the creation of social capital. Am. Behav. Sci. 42(1): 47-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tal, H. (1999). Black feminism, white feminism. Kolbo, August 20.

  • Tarrow, S. (1989). Struggle, Politics, and Reform: Collective Action, Social Movements, and Cycles of Protest, Western Societies Program, Occasional Paper No. 21, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (1996). Making social science work across space and time: A critical reflection on Robert Putnam's “Making Democracy Work.” Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 90(2): 389-397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (1994). Sharing the Journey: Support Groups and America's New Quest for Community, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (1998). Loose Connections: Joining Together in America's Fragmented Communities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yishai, Y. (1991). Land of Paradoxes: Interest Politics in Israel, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yishai, Y. (2001). Bringing society back in: Post-cartel parties in Israel. Party Polit. 7: 667-688.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yishai, Y. Civil Society and Democracy: The Israeli Experience. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 13, 215–234 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020303908944

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020303908944

Navigation