Abstract
As scientific research has taken on increasingeconomic significance so research managementhas become a priority for universities and theState. Over the last two decades,Industry-Liaison Offices have become anestablished part of the infrastructure ofCanadian universities. The managers of theseoffices are the quintessential boundary workerswho are charged with translating academicscience into intellectual property. Someuniversities operate with an `internal' modelwhere the office is fully integrated into theuniversity's structure. Other universitiesoperate with an `external' model where theoffice operates outside the university eitheras a non-profit or a for-profit corporation.This article traces the institutionalization ofthese offices and commercialization in Canadianuniversities. Using documentary analysis andinterviews we document the key issues for thesemanagers in four `case' study universities, asthey attempt to commercialize universityresearch. We describe how these managers`capture the benefits' of discoveries generatedby researchers – the process of identifying,protecting, and exploiting intellectualproperty. Finally, we identify four majorthemes: intellectual property policy; cultureconflict; boundary work; and the public good. We end by raising the question about what islost when `capital' is allowed to enteruniversity culture in such a direct manner.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguayo, A.J. and Murphy, R.A. (1997) 'Canada's crisis: Can business rescue science?' Science 275 (5297), 10 January: 139.
AUTM (1998) AUTM Licensing Survey, Fiscal Year 1997, Annual Survey of Member Institutions. AUTM Licensing Survey, Association of University Technology Managers, Inc.
Atkinson-Grosjean, J., House, D. and Fisher, D. (2001). 'Canadian science policy and public research organizations in the 20th century', Science Studies 14(1), 3-25.
Bourdieu, P. (1969). 'Intellectual field and the creative project'. Social Science Information 8(2), 89-19.
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus. Translated by Peter Collier. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Callon, M. (1995). 'Four models of the dynamics of science', in Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Peterson, J.C. and Pinch, T. (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Callon, M., Law, J. and Rip, A. (eds.) (1986). Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. London: Macmillan.
Cassin, A.M. and Morgan, J.G. (1992). 'The professoriate and the market-driven university: Transforming the control of work in the academy', in Carroll, W.K., Christiansen-Ruffman, L., Currie, R.F. and Harrison, D. (eds.), Fragile Truths: Twenty-Five Years of Sociology and Anthropology in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Carleton University Press, pp. 247-260.
CIAR (1995). The Commercialization of University Research in Canada. Industry Canada Discussion Paper. Toronto, ON: Canadian Institute of Advanced Research and Industry Canada.
Clark, B.R. (1983). The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross National Perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial University Organizations: Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: Pergamon.
DFAIT (1996). Canada's Research and Development Infrastructure. Online at http://www. dfait-maeci.gc.ca/english/html/60/60150.htm. Ottawa: Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade.
Doutriaux, J. and Barker, M. (1995). 'The university-industry relationship in science and technology', Science and Technology Review. Occasional Paper. Ottawa: Industry Canada.
Enros, P. and Farley, M. (1986). University Offices for Technology Transfer: Toward the Service University. Ottawa, ON: Science Council of Canada.
Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (eds.) (1997). Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy. London: Cassell Press.
Etzkowitz, H. and Webster, A. (1995). 'Science as intellectual property', in Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Peterson, J.C. and Pinch, T. (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Etzkowitz, H. and Webster, A. (1997). Capitalising Knowledge. New York: SUNY Press.
Etzkowitz, H. (1997). 'The entrepreneurial university and the emergence of democratic corporatism', in Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (eds.), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy. London: Cassell Press, pp. 141-152.
Expert Panel on the Commercialization if University Research (1999). Public Investments in University Research: Reaping the Benefits, prepared for the PrimeMinister's Advisory Committee on Science and Technology. Ottawa: Industry Canada.
Fisher, D. (1988). 'Boundary work: Toward a model of the relation power/knowledge', Knowledge in Society 10(2), 156-176.
Fisher, D. (1990). 'Boundary work and science: The relation between power and knowledge', in Cozzens, S.E. and Gieryn, T. (eds.), Theories of Science in Society. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 98-119.
Fisher, D. (1993). Fundamental Development of the Social Sciences: Rockefeller Philanthropy and the United States Social Science Research Council. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Fisher, D. (1999). 'A matter of trust: Rockefeller philanthropy and the creation of the social science research councils in the United States and Canada', in Richardson, T. and Fisher, D. (eds.), The Development of the Social Sciences in the United States and Canada: The Role of Philanthropy. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 75-93.
Fisher, D. and Edwards, G. (1999). 'The legitimation of educational studies in Canadian universities: A social history of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education', in Allard, M., Covert, J., Dufresne-Tassé, C., Hildyard, A. and Jackson, M. (eds.), A Challenge Met: The Definition and Recognition of the Field of Education. Ottawa: Canadian Society for the Study of Education, pp. 8-118.
Fisher, D., Atkinson-Grosjean, J. and House, D. (2001). 'Changes in academy/industry/state relations in Canada: The creation and development of the networks of centres of excellence', Minerva XXXIX(3), 265-298.
Fuller, S. (1988). Social Epistemology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Gieryn, T.F. (1983). 'Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists', American Sociological Review 48, 781-95.
Gieryn, T.F. (1995). 'Boundaries of science', in Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Peterson, J.C. and Pinch, T. (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gieryn, T.F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hardy, C. (1992). 'Managing the relationship: University relations with business and government', in Cutt, J. and Dobell, R. (eds.), Public Purse, Public Purpose: Autonomy and Accountability in the Groves of Academe. Ottawa, ON: Institute for Research on Public Policy and Canadian Comprehensive Auditing Foundation, pp. 193-218.
Industry Canada (1996). Science and Technology for the New Century: A Federal Strategy. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
Kaghan, W.N. (1998). Court and Spark: Studies in Professional University Technology Transfer Management. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
Klein, J.T. (1996). Crossing Boundaries, Knowledge, Disciplinarities and Interdisciplinarities. Charlotte, VA: University of Virginia.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action, How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977). 'Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony', in Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P. (eds.) (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nelson, R.R. (1996). The Sources of Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Newson, J.A. (1994). 'Subordinating democracy: The effects of fiscal retrenchment and university-business partnerships on knowledge creation and knowledge dissemination in universities', Higher Education 27, 141-161.
Newson, J. (1998). 'The corporate-linked university: from social project to market force', Canadian Journal of Communication 23(1), 107-124.
OECD (1996). The knowledge-based economy. Science, Technology, and Industry Outlook. Paris: OECD.
OECD (1998). University Research in Transition. Paris: OECD.
Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P. (1983). 'The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields', in Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P. (eds.) (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reimers, N. (1999). Best North American Practices in Technology Transfer, report commissioned by the Expert Panel on Commercialization of the Prime Minister's Advisory Council on Science and Technology. Ottawa: ACST.
Ringer, F. (1992). Fields of Knowledge: French Academic Culture in Comparative Perspective, 1890-1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rouse, J. (1992). 'What are cultural studies of scientific knowledge?', Configurations 1(1), 57-94.
Rouse, J. (1996). Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophi. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Savoie, D.J. (1995). 'What is wrong with the new public management?', Canadian Public Administration 38(1), 112-121.
Scott, W.R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L.L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Spradley, J.P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Star, S.L. and Grieseme, J.R. (1989). 'Institutional cology,'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39', Social Studies of Science 19, 387-420.
Statistics Canada (1999). Survey of Intellectual Property Commercialization in the Higher Education Sector, 1998, by Bordt, M. and Read, C. 88F0006XPB No. 01; ST-00-01, Science and Technology Redesign Project. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
Walsh, K. (1996). Public Services and Market Mechanisms: Competition, Contracting, and the New Public Management. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Webster, A. and Packer, K. (1996). 'When worlds collide: Patents in public sector research', in Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (eds.) (1997). Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy. London: Cassell Press, pp. 47-59.
Ziman, J. (1994). Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fisher, D., Atkinson-Grosjean, J. Brokers on the boundary: Academy-industry liaison in Canadian universities. Higher Education 44, 449–467 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019842322513
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019842322513