Abstract
We report the results of an optical analogue of the fullerene molecule diffraction experiment. Our results, and an analysis of the fullerene experiment, suggest that the patterns observed in the latter can be explained using a localized particle model. There is no evidence that the grating period contributed to the published fullerene diffraction pattern. De Broglie waves, if they exist, are unlikely to have played a significant part in the fullerene diffraction experiment. The observed patterns are not consistent with those expected according to wave theory for the experimental geometry corresponding to the slit-detector system and the de Broglie wavelength. The measurements were performed in the near field, making the demonstration of wave properties difficult. We outline a new classical approach to the electron and neutron interference experiments. The magnetic moment is crucial to this model, which emphasizes a mechanism for generating narrow-band continuum X-radiation. Some experiments are proposed which can decide between the suggested model and quantum mechanics, and which can also rule out an alternative stochastic model.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. L. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Commemorative Issue (Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989), Vol. I, Chap. 37.
P. Grangier, G. Roger, and A. Aspect, Europhys. Lett. 1, 173 (1986).
A. Tonomura, J. Endo, T. Matsuda, T. Kawasaki, and H. Ezawa, Am. J. Phys. 57 (2), 117 (1989).
A. Zeilinger, R. Gähler, C. G. Shull, W. Treimer, and W. Mampe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 1067 (1988); A. Zeilinger, R. Gaehler, C. G. Shull, and W. Treimer, in Proceedings of the Conference on Neutron Scattering, Argonne, 1981, J. Faber, Jr. ed. (AIP, New York, 1982), pp. 93–99.
M. Arndt, O. Nairz, J. Vos-Andreae, C. Keller, G. van der Zouw, and A. Zeilinger, Nature 401, 680 (1999).
M. O. Scully, B.-G. Englert, and H. Walther, Nature 351, 111 (1991).
U. Eichmann, J. C. Bergquist, J. J. Bollinger, J. M. Gilligan, W. M. Itano, D. J. Wineland, and M. G. Raizen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2359 (1993).
G. Möllenstedt and H. Düker, Z. Phys. 145, 377 (1956).
J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1975), pp. 441–442.
E. Hecht and A. Zajac, Optics (Addison–Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1974), pp. 333–336.
O. Nairz, M. Arndt, and A. Zeilinger, “Experimental verification of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle for hot fullerene molecules, ” archive: quant-ph/0105061 (2001).
E. Hecht and A. Zajac, Optics (Addison–Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1974), pp. 467–468.
T. W. Marshall and E. Santos, Found. Phys. 18, 185 (1988).
S. Sulcs, G. Oppy, and B. C. Gilbert, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33, 3997 (2000).
K. Dechoum, L. de la Peña, and E. Santos, Found. Phys. Lett. 13, 253 (2000).
M. Szilagyi, Electron and Ion Optics (Plenum, New York, 1988), p. 391. K. D. van der Mast, in Electron Microscopy in Materials Science, P. G. Merli and M. V. Antisari, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), pp. 3–37.
H. R. Crane, Sci. Am. 218 (1), 72 (1968).
A. F. Ranãda and M. F. Ranãda, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 12, 1419 (1979).
A. O. Barut, in Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism: The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Paradox, F. Selleri, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1988), pp. 433–446.
J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1975), pp. 522 ff.
Ref. 19, pp. 395 ff.
G. I. Taylor, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 15, 114 (1909).
A. H. Sørenson and E. Uggerhøj, Nature 325, 311 (1987).
K. Wiesenfeld and F. Moss, Nature 373, 33 (1995).
A. G. Klein, P. D. Kearney, G. I. Opat, A. Cimmino, and R. Gähler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 959 (1981). A. G. Klein, G. I. Opat, A. Cimmino, A. Zeilinger, W. Treimer, and R. Gähler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 1551 (1981). R. Gähler, J. Kalus, and W. Mampe, J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 13, 546 (1980).
U. Bonse and H. Rauch, eds., Neutron Interferometry: Proceedings of an International Workshop Held 5–7 June 1978 at the Institut Max von Laue-Paul Langevin Grenoble (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1979).
H. A. Enge, Introduction to Nuclear Physics (Addison–Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1966), p. 215.
H. E. Puthoff, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4857 (1989).
F. Selleri, Quantum Paradoxes and Physical Reality (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1990), pp. 77–81.
D. A. Rice, Found. Phys. 27, 1345 (1997).
L. de la Penã and A. M. Cetto, Found. Phys. 24, 753 (1994); The Quantum Dice: an Introduction to Stochastic Electrodynamics (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996), pp. 378–382.
T. H. Boyer, Phys. Rev. D 29, 1096 (1984).
E. Nelson, Phys. Rev. 150, 1079 (1966).
A. F. Ranãda, M. F. Raãda, M. Soler, and L. Vásquez, Phys. Rev. D 10, 517 (1974).
J. W. G. Wignall, Found. Phys. 17, 123 (1987).
E. Santos, Found. Phys. 22, 371 (1992).
R. M. Eisberg, Fundamentals of Modern Physics (Wiley, New York, 1961), p. 328.
Y. Koh, in Wave-Particle Duality, F. Selleri, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1992), pp. 139–156.
S. Sulcs and B. C. Gilbert, “Eddy currents in the Stern-Gerlach experiment, ” accepted for publication in Can. J. Phys.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sulcs, S., Gilbert, B.C. & Osborne, C.F. On the Interference of Fullerenes and Other Massive Particles. Foundations of Physics 32, 1251–1271 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019771303840
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019771303840