Abstract
This study explores whether alternating betweenthe pronouns “he” and “she” ina text is an effective way to avoid sexist language.Participants were psychology students at a largemidwestern university and were predominately White and frommiddle-class backgrounds. Students read two versions ofan essay, one that alternated between masculine andfeminine pronouns and one that exclusively used paired, “he or she”-type pronouns. Readersperceived the alternating version to be biased in favorof females and lower in overall quality than the pairedversion. However, the alternating version appeared to be more effective at combating sexism,suggesting an alternating strategy may be desirable forauthors with this goal. If the author is not primarilyconcerned with increasing readers' awareness of gender issues, techniques such as pluralization or thesingular “they” may be moreappropriate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Addison Wesley Longman. (1998). Author's guide. Reading, MA: Author. American Heritage dictionary of the English language (1996). 3rd ed. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
American Marketing Association. (1996). The AMA style guide for business writing. New York: Author.
American Medical Association. (1998). AMA manual of style: A guide for authors and editors (9th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
American Psychological Association. (1994). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Baron, D. E. (1981). The epicene pronoun: The word that failed. American Speech, 56, 83–97.
Bate B. (1978). Nonsexist language use in transition. Journal of Communication, 28, 139–149.
Bem, S., & Bem, D. (1973). Does sex-biased job advertisting ''aid and abet'' sex discrimination? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 6–18.
Blaubergs, J. S. (1978). Changing sexist language: The theory behind the practice. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 244–261.
Bodine, A. (1975). Sex differentiation in language. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 130–151). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Bolinger, D. (1980). Language—The loaded weapon. London: Longman.
Buckley, W. F. (1976, May 28). Unsex me now. National Review, p. 583. Chicago manual of style (1993). 14th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clark, H., and Clark, E. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Converse, C. C.(1884). A new pronoun. The Critican d Good Literature, 1884 (2 August), 55.
Cooper, R. (1984). The avoidance of androcentric generics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 50, 5–20.
Dumond, V. (1990). The elements of nonsexist usage: A guide to inclusive spoken and written english. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Fenner, M. S. (1974). After all, Today' s Education, 63, 110.
Fisk, W. R. (1985). Responses to ''neutral' ' pronoun presentations and the development of sex-biased responding. Developmental Psychology, 21, 481–485.
Frank, F. W., & Treichler, P. A. (1989). Guidelines for nonsexist usage. In F. W. Frank & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Language, gender, and professional writing:Theoretical approaches and guidelines for nonsexist usage (pp. 137–280). New York: Commission on the Status of Women in the Profession/Modern Language Association of America.
Gastil, J. (1990).Generic pronouns and sexist language: The oxymoronic character ofmasculine generics. Sex Roles, 23, 629–643.
Gibaldi, J. (Ed.). (1998). MLA style manual (2nd ed.). New York: Modern Language Association.
Goldberg, P. A. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women? Transaction, 5, 28–30.
Hacker, D. (1998). The Bed ford handbook (5th ed.)Boston: Bedford Books.
Hacker, D. (1999). A writer' s reference (4th ed.)Boston: Bedford Books.
Hamilton, M. C. (1988). Using masculine generics: Do generic ''he' ' increase male bias in the user's imagery? Sex Roles, 19, 785–799.
Hamilton, M. C. (1991). Masculine bias in the attribution of personhood: People-male; male-people. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 393–402.
Heffernan, J. A., & Lincoln, J. F. (1982). Writing: A college handbook (pp. 311–312). New York: Norton.
Huber, J. (1976). On the generic use of male pronouns. American Sociologist, 11, 89.
Kidd, V. (1971). A study of the images produced through the use of a male pronoun as the generic. Movements: Contemporary Rhetoric and Communication, 1, 25–30.
Lunsford, A., & Connors, R. (1999). The new St.Martin' s handbook. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin's.
Lyons, J. (1968). Theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacKay, D. G. (1980a). Psychology, prescriptive grammar and the pronoun problem. American Psychologist, 35, 444–449.
MacKay, D. G. (1980b). On the goals, principles, and procedures for prescriptive grammar: Singular ''they.'' Language in Society, 9, 349–367.
MacKay, D. G. (1983). Prescriptive grammar and the pronoun problem. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, and N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 38–53). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
MacKay, D. G., & Fulkerson, D. (1979). On the comprehension and production of pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 661–673.
Martyna, W. (1983). Beyond the he/man approach: The case of nonsexist language. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, and N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender, and society (pp. 25–37). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
McConnell, A. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1996). Women as men and people: Effects of gender marked language. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1004–1013.
McConnell, A. R., & Gavanski, I. (1994, May). Women as men and people: Occupation title suffixes as primes. Paper presented at the 66th annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
McConnell-Ginet, S. (1989). The sexual (re )production of meaning: A discourse-based theory. In F. W. Frank & P. A. Tetichler (Eds.), Language, gender, and professional writing: Theoretical approaches and guidelines for nonsexist usage (pp. 35–50). New York: Commission on the Status of Women in the Profession/Modern Language Association of America.
McConnell-Ginet, S., Borker, R., and Furman, N. (1986). Linguistics and the feminist challenge. In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker, and N. Furman (Eds.), Women and language in literature and society (pp. 3–25). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Meyers, M. (1990). Current generic pronoun usage. American Speech, 65, 228–237.
Miller, C., & Swift, K. (1988). The handbook of nonsexist writing. New York: Harper & Row.
Moulton, J., Robinson, G. M., and Elias, C. (1978). Sex bias in language use. American Psychologist, 33, 1032–1036.
Murdock, N. L., & Forsyth, D. R. (1985). Is gender-biased language sexist? A perceptual approach. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 39–49.
Rosnow, R. L., & Rosnow, M. (1995). Writing papers in psychology: A student guide. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Rubin, D. L., Greene, K., & Schneider, D. (1994). Adopting gender-inclusive language reforms: Diachronic and synchronic variation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 91–114.
Schneider, J. W., & Hacker, S. L. (1973). Sex role imagery and use of the generic ''man'' in introductory texts: A case in the sociology and sociology. American Sociologist, 8, 12–18.
Schwartz, M., and the Task Force on Bias-free Language of the Association of American University Presses (1995). Guidelines for bias-free writing (pp. 8–29). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Sklar, E. (1988). The tribunal of use: Agreement in indefinite constructions. College Composition and Communication, 39, 410–422.
Spencer, N. J. (1978). Can ''she'' and ''he'' coexist? American Psychologist, 33, 782–783.
Stericker, A. (1981). Does this ''he or she'' business really make a difference? The effect of masculine pronouns as generics on job attitudes. Sex Roles, 7, 637–641.
Strunk, W., & White, E. B. (1979). The elements of style. New York: Macmillan.
Swim, J., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G., & Myers, D. G. (1989). Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 409–429.
Switzer, J. Y. (1990). The impact of generic word choices: An empirical investigation of age-and sex-related differences. Sex Roles, 22, 69–82.
Valian, V. (1977). Linguistics and feminism. In M. Vetterline-Braggin, F. Elliston, J. English, & M. Vetterling (Eds.), Feminism and philosophy (pp. 154–166). Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams.
Wilson, E., & Ng, S. H. (1988). Sex bias in visual images evoked by generics: A New Zealand study, Sex Roles, 18, 159–168.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Madson, L., Hessling, R.M. Does Alternating Between Masculine and Feminine Pronouns Eliminate Perceived Gender Bias in Text?. Sex Roles 41, 559–575 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018895321444
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018895321444