Skip to main content
Log in

The Demand for Accounting Conservatism for Management Control

  • Published:
Review of Accounting Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show that conservative financial reporting arises naturallyin principal-agent settings as a means of efficiently motivating agentswhen the penalties that can be imposed on agents are limited. Weconsider an accounting system whose reports are used for contracting andwhose parameters are controlled by the principal. One advantage of our model is that the information system we describe has the accountingcharacteristic of mapping unbiased underlying information about the firminto a reduced message space. The principal can choose how that mappingoperates, i.e., conservatively, liberally, or neutrally. When penaltiesare sufficiently limited (a limited liability setting), we show that theaccounting system designed by the principal is always conservative. Alternatively, in an unlimited liability setting, any bias in the systemdepends on random circumstances, and we would not expect accountingconservatism to arise as a pervasive and enduring phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accounting Principles Board. (1970). Accounting Principles Board Statement No. 4, Basic Concepts and Principles Underlying Statements of Business Enterprises. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antle, R., and R. Lambert. (1988). “Accountants' Loss Functions and Induced Incentives for Conservatism.” In G. Feltham, A. Amershi, and W. Ziemba (eds.), Economic Analysis of Information and Contracts: Essays in Honor of John E. Butterworth. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, S., and M. Rajan. (1995). “Centralization, Delegation, and Shared Responsibility in the Assignment of Capital Investment Decision Rights.” Journal of Accounting Research 33 (Supplement), 135-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, Sudipta. (1997). “The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 24, 3-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, W. H. (1993). “Conservatism.”Working Paper, Stanford University [presented at the American Accounting Association national meeting].

  • Bushman, R., R. Indjejikian, and A. Smith. (1995). “Aggregate Performance Measures in Business Unit Manager Compensation: The Role of Intrafirm Interdependencies.” Journal of Accounting Research 33 (Supplement), 101-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demski, J., and D. Sappington. (1990). “Fully Revealing Income Measurement.” The Accounting Review 65, 363-383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, C. (1963). “The Rule of Conservatism Reexamined.” Journal of Accounting Research 1, 127-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S., and S. Reichelstein. (2000). “Controlling Investment Decisions: Hurdle Rates and Intertemporal Cost Allocation.” Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, R. (1988). “Earnings Management in an Overlapping Generations Model.” Journal of Accounting Research 26, 195-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans III, J. H., and S. Sridhar. (1996). “Multiple Control Systems, Accrual Accounting, and Earnings Management.” Journal of Accounting Research 34, 45-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1995). Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts. No. 2, Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. (1976). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. K. (1995). “Efficiency of an Information System in an Agency Model.” Econometrica 63, 89-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. K., and Y. S. Suh. (1991). “Ranking of Accounting Information Systems for Management Control.” Journal of Accounting Research 29, 386-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichelstein, S. (1997). “Investment Decisions and Managerial Performance Evaluation.” Review of Accounting Studies 2, 157-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sappington, D. (1983). “Limited Liability Contracts between Principal and Agent.” Journal of Economic Theory 29, 1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. (1975). “Auditor's Loss Functions Implicit in Consumption-Investment Models.” Journal of Accounting Research 13, 98-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, R. R. (1970). Theory of the Measurement of Enterprise Income. Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kwon, Y.K., Newman, D.P. & Suh, Y.S. The Demand for Accounting Conservatism for Management Control. Review of Accounting Studies 6, 29–52 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011330003876

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011330003876

Navigation