Abstract
We show that conservative financial reporting arises naturallyin principal-agent settings as a means of efficiently motivating agentswhen the penalties that can be imposed on agents are limited. Weconsider an accounting system whose reports are used for contracting andwhose parameters are controlled by the principal. One advantage of our model is that the information system we describe has the accountingcharacteristic of mapping unbiased underlying information about the firminto a reduced message space. The principal can choose how that mappingoperates, i.e., conservatively, liberally, or neutrally. When penaltiesare sufficiently limited (a limited liability setting), we show that theaccounting system designed by the principal is always conservative. Alternatively, in an unlimited liability setting, any bias in the systemdepends on random circumstances, and we would not expect accountingconservatism to arise as a pervasive and enduring phenomenon.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Accounting Principles Board. (1970). Accounting Principles Board Statement No. 4, Basic Concepts and Principles Underlying Statements of Business Enterprises. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Antle, R., and R. Lambert. (1988). “Accountants' Loss Functions and Induced Incentives for Conservatism.” In G. Feltham, A. Amershi, and W. Ziemba (eds.), Economic Analysis of Information and Contracts: Essays in Honor of John E. Butterworth. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Baiman, S., and M. Rajan. (1995). “Centralization, Delegation, and Shared Responsibility in the Assignment of Capital Investment Decision Rights.” Journal of Accounting Research 33 (Supplement), 135-164.
Basu, Sudipta. (1997). “The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 24, 3-38.
Beaver, W. H. (1993). “Conservatism.”Working Paper, Stanford University [presented at the American Accounting Association national meeting].
Bushman, R., R. Indjejikian, and A. Smith. (1995). “Aggregate Performance Measures in Business Unit Manager Compensation: The Role of Intrafirm Interdependencies.” Journal of Accounting Research 33 (Supplement), 101-128.
Demski, J., and D. Sappington. (1990). “Fully Revealing Income Measurement.” The Accounting Review 65, 363-383.
Devine, C. (1963). “The Rule of Conservatism Reexamined.” Journal of Accounting Research 1, 127-138.
Dutta, S., and S. Reichelstein. (2000). “Controlling Investment Decisions: Hurdle Rates and Intertemporal Cost Allocation.” Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley.
Dye, R. (1988). “Earnings Management in an Overlapping Generations Model.” Journal of Accounting Research 26, 195-235.
Evans III, J. H., and S. Sridhar. (1996). “Multiple Control Systems, Accrual Accounting, and Earnings Management.” Journal of Accounting Research 34, 45-65.
Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1995). Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts. No. 2, Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. (1976). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.
Kim, S. K. (1995). “Efficiency of an Information System in an Agency Model.” Econometrica 63, 89-102.
Kim, S. K., and Y. S. Suh. (1991). “Ranking of Accounting Information Systems for Management Control.” Journal of Accounting Research 29, 386-396.
Reichelstein, S. (1997). “Investment Decisions and Managerial Performance Evaluation.” Review of Accounting Studies 2, 157-180.
Sappington, D. (1983). “Limited Liability Contracts between Principal and Agent.” Journal of Economic Theory 29, 1-21.
Scott, W. (1975). “Auditor's Loss Functions Implicit in Consumption-Investment Models.” Journal of Accounting Research 13, 98-120.
Sterling, R. R. (1970). Theory of the Measurement of Enterprise Income. Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Press.
Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kwon, Y.K., Newman, D.P. & Suh, Y.S. The Demand for Accounting Conservatism for Management Control. Review of Accounting Studies 6, 29–52 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011330003876
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011330003876