Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethically Related Judgments by Observers of Earnings Management

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Merchant and Rockness (1994, p. 92) characterize earnings management as "probably the most important ethical issue facing the accounting profession" and provide initial evidence of the ethical judgments of various organizational members. The current study extends their work by examining the extent to which an individual's ethically-related judgments in response to earnings management activities are associated with the individual's role.

In an experimental study, evening MBA students read three hypothetical scenarios involving a manager engaging in earnings management. The scenarios involved a gain from an operating activity, a gain from an accounting activity, and a loss from an accounting activity. Before reading the cases, however, participants were randomly assigned to one of three roles: a shareholder, another manager from the company who is unfamiliar with the manager in the case, or another manager from the company who is familiar with the manager in the case. Following each case, participants made four ethically related judgments.

Participants assuming the role of another manager from the company who is unfamiliar with the manager in the case were expected to reach more unfavorable ethically related judgments than were shareholders or a manager who is familiar with the manager in the case. Generally, the results supported these predictions for accounting based earnings management activities but not for the operating based case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S.: 1965, ‘Inequity in Social Exchange’, in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Academic Press).

  • Becker, H. and D. J. Fritzsche: 1987, ‘A Comparison of the Ethical Behavior of American, French and German managers’, Columbia Journal of World Business 22, 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, W. J. Jr. and K. A. Merchant: March/April 1989, ‘Ethics Test for Everyday Managers’, Harvard Business Review 67, 220–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, W. J., Jr. and K. A. Merchant: August 1990, ‘The Dangerous Morality of Managing Earnings. Management Accounting 72(2), 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, N. and R. A. Melcher: 1998, ‘Earnings Hocus-Pocus’, Business Week (October 5), 134–142.

  • DeGeorge, R. T.: 1990, Business Ethics, 3rd Ed. (Macmillan, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Demski, J., J. Patell and M. Wolson: 1984, ‘Decentralized Choice of Monitoring Systems’, The Accounting Review 59, 16–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. and K. Rosenzweig: 1995, ‘Attitudes of Students and Accounting Practitioners Concerning the Ethical Acceptability of Earnings Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(6), 433–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flory, S. M., T. J. Phillips, R. E. Reidenbach and D. P Robin: 1992. ‘A Multidimensional Analysis of Selected Ethical Issues in Accounting’, The Accounting Review 67, 284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, J., K. Gaver and J. Austin: 1995, ‘Additional Evidence on Bonus Plans and Income Management’, Journal of Accounting and Economics 18, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavin, J., K. Gavin and J. Austin: 1995, ‘Additional Evidence on Bonus Plans and Income Management’, Journal of Accounting and Economics 18, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidry, F., A. J. Leone and S. Rock: 1999, ‘Earnings-Based Bonus Plans and Earnings Management by Business-Unit Managers’, Journal of Accounting and Economics 26, 113–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P. M.: 1985, ‘The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions’, Journal of Accounting and Economics 7, 85–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P. M. and J. M. Whalen: 1999, ‘A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard Setting’, Accounting Horizons 12 (December), 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holthausen, R., D. Larcker and R. Sloan: 1995, ‘Annual Bonus Schemes and the Manipulation of Earnings’, Journal of Accounting and Economics 19, 29–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. N., S. E. Kaplan and P. M. J. Reckers: 1998, ‘An Examination of Potential Gender-Based Differences in Audit Managers’ Performance Evaluation Judgments', Behavioral Research in Accounting 10, 47–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A.: 1990, ‘Toward an Agenda for Business Ethics Research’, Academy of Management Review 15, 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaynama, S. A., A. King and L. W. Smith: 1996, ‘The Impact of a Shift in Organizational Role on Ethical Perceptions: A Comparative Study’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 581–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, A. Jr.: Dec. 1998, ‘The Numbers Game’, The CPA Journal 68, 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A.: 1989, Rewarding Results: Motivating Profit Center Managers (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A. and J. Rockness: 1994, ‘The Ethics of Managing Earnings: An Empirical Investigation’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 13, 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting: 1987, Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, K.: 1988, ‘Commentary on Earnings Management’, Accounting Horizons, 91–102.

  • Shafer, W. E., R. E. Morris and A. A. Ketchand: 1999, ‘The Effects of Formal Sanctions on Auditor Independence’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 18 (Supplement), 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. S.: 1996, ‘The Role of Moral Intensity and Fairness Perception in Judgments of Ethicality: A Comparison of Managerial Professionals and the General Public’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 469–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M., S. Mitchell and J. Turner: 1998, ‘Consideration of Moral Intensity in Ethicality Judgments: Its Relationship with Whistle-Blowing and Need-for-Cognition’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 527–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. S. and A. E. Singer: 1997, ‘Observer Judgments about Moral Agents’ Ethical Decisions: The Role of Scope of Justice and Moral Intensity', Journal of Business Ethics 16, 473–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, H. and J. F. Yates: 1995, ‘Sunk Cost Effects: The Influences of Instruction and Future Estimates’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Performance 63, 311–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. and G. Loewenstein: 1992, ‘Egocentric Interpretations of Fairness and Future Return Estimates’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Performance 49, 176–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J. F.: 1992, Judgment and Decision Making (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Accountancy and Information Management, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 873606, Tempe, AZ, 85287-3606, U.S.A.

    Steven E. Kaplan

Authors
  1. Steven E. Kaplan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaplan, S.E. Ethically Related Judgments by Observers of Earnings Management. Journal of Business Ethics 32, 285–298 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010600802029

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010600802029

Keywords

Search

Navigation