Abstract
In America by the 1930s, albino rats had become a kind of generic standard in research on physiology and behavior that de-emphasized diversity across species. However, prior to about 1915, the early work of many of the pioneer rat researchers in America and in central Europe reflected a strong interest in species differences and a deep regard for diversity. These scientists sought broad, often medical, generality, but their quest for generality using a standard animal did not entail a de-emphasis of organic diversity. They chose white rats as test animals for two primary reasons. First, rats develop very slowly. They therefore made features of physiological, neural and psychological development accessible to the experimental method at a time when its application to the phenomena of development remained controversial. Secondly, rats were thought to have unusually strong sex drives. For this reason they became central to the experimental study of sexuality and, in the work of the reproductive physiologist Eugen Steinach, sexual development. Connections among three research institutes that stressed experimental approaches to the study of brain and development demonstrate the importance of the rat's institutional role. As the emphasis on experimentation in the study of development grew, two of these institutes bred rats to provide uniform materials. Eventually, however, their reasons for selecting rats were lost; and the ready availability of a uniform test animal led to a shift in scientists' presumptions about diversity, as the standard rat became a tool for assuring generality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amann, K. 1994. “Menschen, Maüse und Fliegen. Eine wissenssoziologische Analyse der Transformation von Organismen in epistemische Objekte.” In: Objeckte, Differenzen und Konjunkturen. Experimentalsysteme im historischen Kontext, eds. M. Hagner and H.-J. Rheinberger. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Askanazy, M. 1909. “Die Resultate der Experimentellen Forschung uber Teratoide Geschulste.” Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift LIX (43–44): 2517–2523.
Benson,.R., Maienschein, J. and Rainger, R. (eds.). 1991. The Expansion of American Biology. New Brunswick: Rutgers Univ. Press.
Boakes, R. 1984. From Darwin to Behaviourism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Borell, M. 1978. “Organotherapy, British Physiology and the Discovery of Internal Secretions.” Journal of the History of Biology 9: 235–268.
Borell, M. 1985. “Organotherapy and the Emergence of Reproductive Endocrinology.” Journal of the History of Biology 18: 1–30.
Burian, R.M. 1993. “How the Choice of Experimental Organism Matters: Epistemological Reflections on an Aspect of Biological Practice.” Journal of the History of Biology 26(2): 351–367.
Cahan, D. (ed.). 1993. Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science. Berkeley: Univ. California Press.
Churchill, F.B. 1973. “Chabry, Roux, and the Experimental Method in Nineteenth-Century Embryology.” In: Foundations of Scientific Method in the Nineteenth-century, eds. R.N. Giere and R.S Westfall. Bloomington, IND: Indiana University Press.
Clarke, A.E. 1987. “Research Materials and Reproductive Science in the United States, 1910–1940.” In: Physiology in the American Context, 1850–1940, ed. G.L. Geison. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.
Clarke, A.E. 1991. “Embryology and the Development of American Reproductive Science, c. 1900–1940.” In: The American Expansion of Biology, eds. K. Benson, R. Rainger and J. Maienschein. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Clarke, A.E. and Fujimura, J.H. (eds.) 1992. The Right Tools for the Job. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
Clarke, E. and Jacyna, L.S. 1987. Nineteenth-Century Origins of Neuroscientific Concepts. Berkeley, CA: Univ. California Press.
Clause, B.T. 1993. “TheWistar Rat as a Right Choice: Establishing Mammalian Standards and the Ideal of a Standardized Mammal.” Journal of the History of Biology 26(2): 329–349.
Coleman, W. and Holmes, F.L. 1988. The Investigative Enterprise, Experimental Physiology in Nineteenth Century Medicine. Berkeley, CA: Univ. California Press.
Donaldson, H.H. Henry Donaldson Diaries, H.H. Donaldson Papers. Philadelphia,PA: Archives of the American Philosophical Society.
Donaldson, H.H. 1909. Appendix B. Report to Dr. M. J. Greenman, Director of the Wistar Institute. Work done by Dr. Donaldson during absence in Europe from April 27th to September 4 th , 1909. Philadelphia: Archives of the Wistar Institute.
Donaldson, H.H. 1891–1982. “Nervous System (Six Lectures on Cerebral Localization).” American Journal of Psychology 4: 113–130.
Donaldson, H.H. 1912. “A Comparison of the European Norway and Albino Rats (Mus norvegicus and Mus norvegicus albinus) with those of North America in respect to the Weight of the Central Nervous System and to Cranial Capacity.” The Journal of Comparative Neurology 22: 71–97.
Donaldson, H.H. 1915/1924. The Rat: Data and Reference Tables. Philadelphia: The Wistar Institute of Anatomy.
Donaldson, H.H. and Hatai, S. 1911a. “A Comparison of the Norway Rat with the Albino Rat in Respect to Body Length, Brain Weight, Spinal Cord Weight and the Percentage of Water in Both the Brain and the Spinal Cord.” Journal of Comparative Neurology 21(5): 417–458.
Donaldson, H.H. and Hatai, S. 1911b. “Note on the Influence of Castration on the Weight of the Brain and Spinal Cord in the Albino Rat and on the Percentage of Water in Them.” Journal of Comparative Neurology 21: 155–160.
Fausto-Sterling, A. 2000. Sexing the Body, Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
Frank, R.G. 1987. “American Physiologists in German Laboratories, 1865–1914.” In: (ed.), Physiology in the American Context, ed. G.L. Geison. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.
Geison, G.L. 1987. Physiology in the American Context, 1850–1940. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.
Gendre, A. von. 1885. “Ueber den Einfluss des Nervensystems auf die Todtenstarre.” Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Thiere 35: 45–48.
Gossel, P.P. 1992. “A Need for Standard Methods: The Case of American Bacteriology.” In: The Right Tools for the Job, eds. A.E. Clarke and J.H. Fujimura. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gottlieb, G. 1971. “Ontogenesis of Sensory Function in Birds and Mammals.” In: The Biopsychology of Development, ed. E. Tobach, L.R. Aronson and E. Shaw. New York: Academic Press.
Greenman, M.J., et al. 1927–1928. “History, Organization, Purposes Equipment.” Bulletin of the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology 7: 15–38.
Hacking, I. 1992. “The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences.” In: Science as Practice and Culture, ed. A. Pickering. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hall, D.L. 1973–1974. “Biology, Sex Hormones, and Sexismin the 1920's.” The Philosophical Forum 5: 81–96.
Hatai, S. 1915. “The Growth of Organs in the Albino Rat as Affected by Gonadectomy.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 18: 1–67.
Heidelberger, M. and Steinle, F. (eds.) 1998. Experimental Essays-Versuche zum Experiment, Interdisziplinäre Studien. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
Henneberg, B. 1900. “Die erste Entwickelung derMammarorgane bei der Ratte.” Anatomische Hefte 13: 1–68.
Hirschmüller, A. 1991. “Paul Kammerer und die Vererbung erworbener Eigenschaften.” Medizinhistorisches Journal 26: 26–77.
Kimmelman, B.A. 1992. “Organisms and Interests in Scientific Research: R. A. Emerson's Claim for the Unique Contribution of Agricultural Genetics.” In: The Right Tools for the Job, eds. A.E. Clarke and J.H. Fujimura. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univeristy Press.
Koestler, A. 1971. The Case of the Midwife Toad. New York: Random House.
Kohler, R.E. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Krebs, H.A. 1975. “The August Krogh Principle: ‘For many problems there is an animal on which it can be most conveniently studied.’ ” Journal of Experimental Zoology 194: 221–226.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. 1986. Laboratory Life, The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lindsey, J.R. 1979. “Historical Foundations.” In: The Laboratory Rat, Volume 1: Biology and Diseases, H.J. Baker, J.R. Lindsay and S.H Weisbroth. New York: Academic Press.
Lipschütz, A. 1924. The Internal Secretions of the Sex Glands. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins Co.
Logan, C.A. 1999. “The Comparative Rationale Behind the Choice of a Standard Animal in Psychological Research: Henry H. Donaldson, AdolfMeyer and ‘the Albino Rat’.” History of Psychology 2(1): 3–24.
Logan, C.A. 2000. “Willard S. Small (1870–1943), American Psychologist.” In: Encyclopedia of Psychology, ed. A.E. Kazdin. Washington, D.C. and New York: American Psychological Association and Oxford University Press.
Marburg, O. 1907. “Zur Geschichte des Wiener neurologischen Institutes.” Arbeiten aus dem Neurologischen Institut an der Wiener Universität XV: 7–23.
Miles, W.R. 1930. “On the History of Research with Rats and Mazes: A Collection of Notes.” Journal of General Psychology 3: 324–337.
Munn, N. 1933. An Introduction to Animal Psychology: the Behavior of the Rat. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Nyhart, L.K. 1995. Biology Takes Form: Animal Morphology and the German Universities,1800–1900. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Oudshoorn, N. 1990. “On the Making of Sex Hormones.” Social Studies of Science 20: 5–33.
Oudshoorn, N. 1993. “Labortests und die gemeinsame Klassification von Sexualität und Geschlecht.” In: Die Experimentalisierung des Lebens, eds. H.-J. Rheinberger and M. Hagner. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Pauly, P. 1984. “The Appearance of Academic Biology in Late Nineteenth-Century America.” Journal of the History Biology 17(3): 369–397.
Przibram, H. 1902. “Die neue Anstalt für Experimentelle Biologie in Wien.” Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte 74: 152–155.
Przibram, H. 1909. “Ñbertragungen erworbener Eigenschaften bei Säugetieren: Versuche mit Hitze-Ratten.” Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte 81: 179.
Przibram, H. 1911. Director's Report. Biologisches Versuchsanstalt: Archives of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.
Querner, H. 1974. “Beobachtung oder Experiment? Die Methodenfrage in der Biologie um 1900.” Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft 68: 4–12.
Rader, K.A. 1998. “The ‘Mouse People’: Murine Genetics Work at the Bussey Institution, 1909–1936.” Journal of the History of Biology 31: 327–354.
Rainger, R., Benson, K. and Maienschein, J. (eds.) 1988. The American Development of Biology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Rheinberger, H.-J. and Hagner, M. (eds.) 1993. Die Experimentalisierung des Lebens. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Richter, C.P. 1968. “Experiences of a Reluctant Rat Catcher: The Common Norway Rat, Friend or Foe?” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 112: 405–415.
Ross, D.E. 1972. G. Stanley Hall, The Psychologist as Prophet. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Saltykov, S. 1900. “Uber Transplantation zusammengesetzter Theile.” Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen 9: 329–409.
Schlich, T. 1998. Die Erfindung der Organtransplantation. Erfolg und Scheitern des chirurgischen Organersatzes (1880–1930). Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
Schultheiss, D., Denil, J. and Jonas, U. 1997. “Rejuvenation in the Early 20th Century.” Andrologia 29: 351–355.
Seitelberger, F. 1963. “Heinrich Obersteiner.” Grosse Nervenärzte, Lebensbilder 3: 21–30.
Seitelberger, F. 1992. “Heinrich Obersteiner and the Neurological Institute: Foundation and History of Neuroscience in Vienna.” Brain Pathology 2(2): 163–168.
Sengoopta, C. 1998. “Glandular Politics: Experimental Biology, Clinical Medicine, and Homosexual Emancipation in fin-de-Siècle Central Europe.” Isis 89: 445–473.
Small, W.S. 1899. “Notes on the Psychic Development of the Young White Rat.” American Journal of Psychology XI: p80–100.
Small, W.S. 1900. “An Experimental Study of the Mental Processes of the Rat.” American Journal of Psychology 11: 133–165.
Small, W.S. 1901. “Experimental Study of the Mental Processes of the Rat. II.” American Journal of Psychology 12: 206–239.
Stam, H.J., and Kalmanovitch, T. 1998. “E.L. Thorndike and the Origins of Animal Psychology: On the Nature of the Animal in Psychology.” American Psychologist 53(10):1135–1144.
Steinach, E. 1894. “Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden Physiologie der männlichen Geschlechtsorgane insbesondere der accessorischen Geschlechtsdrusen.” Archiv für die gesammte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere 56: 304–338.
Steinach, E. 1910. “Geschlechtstrieb und echt sekundäre Geschlechtsmerkmale als Folge der innersekretorischen Funktion der Keimdrüse.” Zentralblatt für Physiologie 24: 551–566.
Steinach, E. 1920. Verjüngung durch experimentelle Neubelebung der alternden Pubertätsdrüse. Reprinted from Roux's Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik, Vol 46. (On the occasion of Roux's 70th birthday). Berlin: Julius Springer.
Steinach, E. 1936. “Zur Geschichte des männlichen Sexualhormons und seinerWirkungen am Säugetier und beim Menschen.” Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 49: 161–172.
Steinach, E. 1940. Sex and Life. New York: The Viking Press.
Steinach, E. 1974. “Investigations into the Comparative Physiology of the Male Sexual Organs with Particular Reference to the Accessory Sex Glands.” In: Hormones and Sexual Behavior, ed. C.S. Carter. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
Stewart, C.C. 1889. “Variations in Daily Activity Produced by Alcohol and by Changes in Barometric Pressure and Diet with a Description of Recording Methods.” American Journal of Physiology 1: 40–56.
Stotsenburg, J.M. 1909. “On the Growth of the Albino Rat (Mus norvegicus var.) After Castration.” Anatomical Record 3: 233–244.
Strehl, H. and Weiss, O. 1901. “Beiträge zur Physiologie der Nebenniere.” Archiv für die gesammte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere 86: 107–121.
Todes, D.P. 1997. “Pavlov's Physiology Factory.” Isis 88: 205–246.
Turner, S.R. 1994. In the Eye's Mind: Vision and the Helmholtz-Hering Controversy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Turner, S.R. 1993. “Vision Studies in Germany: Helmholtz Versus Hering.” In: Research Schools, Historical Reappraisals, eds. G.L. Geison and F.L. Holmes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Weidman, N. 1999. Constructing Scientific Psychology; Karl Lashley's Mind-Brain Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Welbourn, R.B. 1990. The history of Endocrine Surgery. New York: Praeger.
Welbourn, R.B. 1992. “The Emergence of Endocrinology.” Gesnerus 49: 137–150.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Logan, C.A. “[A]re Norway Rats ... Things?”: Diversity Versus Generality in the Use of Albino Rats in Experiments on Development and Sexuality. Journal of the History of Biology 34, 287–314 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010398116188
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010398116188