Skip to main content
Log in

Software Agents and Their Bodies

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within artificial intelligence and the philosophy of mind,there is considerable disagreement over the relationship between anagent's body and its capacity for intelligent behavior. Some treatthe body as peripheral and tangential to intelligence; others arguethat embodiment and intelligence are inextricably linked. Softwareagents–-computer programs that interact with software environmentssuch as the Internet–-provide an ideal context in which to studythis tension. I develop a computational framework for analyzingembodiment. The framework generalizes the notion of a body beyondmerely having a physical presence. My analysis sheds light oncertain claims made about the relevance of the body to intelligence,as well as on embodiment in software worlds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • P. Agre and Chapman (1990) ‘What are plans for?’ Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 6(1–2):17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Agre and I. Horswill (1992), Cultural Support for Improvisation', in Proc. 10th Nat. Conf. on AI, pp. 363–368.

  • Y. Aloimonos, ed. (1993) Active Perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Brooks and L. Stein. ‘Building Brains for Bodies. ’ Autonomous Robots, 1(1):7–25, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Brooks. ‘Elephants Don’t Play Chess. ‘Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 6(1–2):3–15, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Brooks (1991a), ‘Intelligence without Reason’, In Proc. 12th Int. Joint Conf. on AI, pp. 569–595.

  • R. Brooks (1991), ‘Intelligence without Representation’, Artificial Intelligence, 47(1–3):139–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Collins (1996), ‘Embedded or Embodied? a Review of Hubert Dreyfus' What Computers Still Can’t Do , Artificial Intelligence, 80(1):99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Donald. On information invariants in robotics. Artificial Intelligence, 72(1–2):217–304. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Dreyfus. What Computers Can't Do, 1979. New York, Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Dreyfus. Being-in-the-World. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Dreyfus and S. Dreyfus. Making a mind vs.modelling a brain: artificial intelligence back at a branchpoint. Dædalus, 117(1):15–43, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Etzioni. Intelligence without robots: A reply to Brooks. AI Magazine, 14(4):7–13, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Etzioni. Etzioni Replies. AI Magazine, 15(2):13–14, 1994. Response to commentary on Etzioni 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Etzioni. Moving up the information food chain: softbots as information carnivores. In Proc. 14th Nat. Conf. on AI, 1996.

  • O. Etzioni and D. Weld. A softbot-based interface to the Internet. CACM, 37(7):72–76

  • O. Etzioni, P. Maes, T. Mitchell, and Y. Shoham, eds. Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Software Agents, Menlo Park, CA, 1994. AAAI Press.

  • O. Etzioni, H. Levy, R. Segal, and C. Thekkath. The softbot approach to OS interfaces. IEEE Software, 12(4):42–51, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Hammond, T. Converse, and J. Grass. The stabilization of environments. Artificial Intelligence, 72(1–2):305–327, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Harnad. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42(1–3):335–346, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Haugeland. Body and world: a review of What Computers Still Can't Do. Artificial Intelligence, 80(1):119–128, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Haugeland. Mind embodied and Embedded. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 58:233–267, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Horswill (1995), Analysis of Adaptation and Environment. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1–2):1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Hutchins. How a cockpit remembers its speed. Cognitive Science, 19(3):265–288, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Johnson. The Body in the Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Kanazawa. Sensible Decisions: Toward a Theory of Decision-Theoretic Information Invariants. In Proc. 12th Nat. Conf. on AI, pp. 973–978, 1994.

  • D. Kirsh. Today the earwig, tomorrow man? Artificial Intelligence, 47(1–3):161–184, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kirsh. The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1–2):31–68, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Kushmerick. Exploiting the environment: Urban navigation as a case study. In Proc. 12th Nat. Conf. on AI, p. 1469, 1994.

  • G. Lakoff. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Lakoff and M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Mason. Compliant motion. In M. Brady, J. Hollerbach, T. Johnson, T. Lozano-Perez, and M. Mason, eds., Robot Motion: Planning and Control. MIT Press, 1982.

  • H. Putnam. Reductionism and the Nature of Psychology. In J. Haugeland, ed., Mind Design. MIT Press, 1981.

  • D. Riecken, Special Issue on Intelligent Agents. Comm. of the ACM, 37(7), 1994.

  • Y. Shoham and M. Tennenholtz. On social laws for artificial agent societies: Off-line design. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1–2):231–252, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Ullman. Visual routines. Cognition, 18(1–3):97–159, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wooldridge and N. Jennings, eds. Intelligent Agents. Springer Verlag, New York, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kushmerick, N. Software Agents and Their Bodies. Minds and Machines 7, 227–247 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008255418509

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008255418509

Navigation