Skip to main content
Log in

CONWIP-based production lines with multiple bottlenecks: performance and design implications

  • Published:
IIE Transactions

Abstract

This research focuses on CONWIP, a closed production control system where all containers traverse a circuit incorporating the entire production line. We develop estimates, for an important level of work in process inventory, for four important performance measures: the means and variances of time between departures and flowtime. We develop our estimates through the concept of a “conceptual bottleneck machine”. This concept enables us to develop an analogy between deterministic and stochastic systems. This concept also allows us to handle migrating bottlenecks, an issue generally neglected. The model is widely applicable, assuming only finite means and variances of the processing time distributions. We test our model computationally, both against existing models and on a wide range of randomly generated problems. Finally we detail insights, obtained from our analytical model, into how CONWIP production systems operate. These insights enable us to explain the sources of the values of our performance measures, thus aiding system design and modification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hopp, W.J., Spearman, M.L. and Duenyas, I. (1993) Economic production quotas for pull manufacturing systems. IIE Transactions, 25, 71—79.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hendricks, K. and McClain, J. (1993) The output processes of serial production lines of general machines with finite bu.ers. Management Science, 39, 1194—1201.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miltenburg, G.J. (1987) Variance of the number of units produced on a transfer line with bu.er inventories during a period of length T. Naval Research Logistics, 34, 811—822.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hendricks, K. (1991) The output processes of simple serial pro-duction lines. Working Paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hendricks, K. (1992) The output processes of serial production lines of exponential machines with finite bu.ers. Operations Research, 40, 1139—1147.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duenyas, I. and Hopp, W.J. (1990) Estimating variance of output from cyclic exponential queuing systems. Queuing Systems, 7, 337—354.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duenyas, I., Hopp, W.J. and Spearman, M.L. (1993) Characterizing the output process of a CONWIP line with deterministic processing and random outages. Management Science, 39, 975— 988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hopp, W.J. and Spearman, M.L. (1991) Throughput of a constant work in process manufacturing line subject to failures. International Journal of Production Research, 29, 635—655.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duenyas, I. and Hopp, W.J. (1992) CONWIP assembly with de-terministic processing and random outages. IIE Transactions, 24, 97—109.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spearman, M.L., Woodru., D.L. and Hopp, W.J. (1990) CONWIP: a pull alternative to kanban. International Journal of Production Research, 28, 879—894.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Spearman, M.L. and Zazanis, M.A. (1992) Push and pull pro-duction systems: issues and comparisons. Operations Research, 40, 521—532.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tayur, S. (1992) Properties of serial kanban systems. Queuing Systems, 12, 297—318.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tayur, S. (1993) Structural properties and a heuristic for kanban controlled serial lines. Management Science, 39, 1347—1368.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muckstadt, J. and Tayur, S. (1995) A comparison of alternative kanban control mechanisms part 1. IIE Transactions, 27, 140— 150.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reiser, M. and Lavenberg, S. (1980) Mean-value analysis of closed multichain queuing networks. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 27, 313—322.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Little, J. (1961) A proof of the queuing formula L = λW. Operations Research, 9, 383—387.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Burbidge, J. (1990) Production control: a universal conceptual framework. Production Planning and Control, 1, 3—16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kanet, J. (1988) MRP 96: time to rethink manufacturing logics. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 29, 57—61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dar-el, E., Herer, Y. & Masin, M. CONWIP-based production lines with multiple bottlenecks: performance and design implications. IIE Transactions 31, 99–111 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007587716586

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007587716586

Keywords

Navigation