Abstract
This paper develops an analysis of aspect shift and applies it to French and English. The Progressive, the Perfect/Parfait, and duration adverbials introduced by in or for are interpreted as aspectual operators which modify eventuality descriptions. The French past tenses are sensitive to aspect, but they do not change the aspectual class of the eventuality description themselves. Instead, they presuppose that the eventuality description they operate on is of the right aspectual type: the Passeé Simple and Imparfait are tense operators which locate respectively events and states in the past. Free aspectual transitions may be triggered by coercion in order to satisfy the aspectual requirements on aspectual and temporal operators. The analysis is formulated within the framework of Discourse Representation Theory (DRT).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asher, Nicholas: 1992, ‘A Default, Truth Conditional Semantics for the Progressive’, Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 463–508.
Bach, Emmon: 1986, ‘The Algebra of Events’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5–16.
Comrie, Bernard: 1976, Aspect, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Depraetere, Ilse: 1995, ‘On the Necessity of Distinguishing Between (Un)boundedness and (A)telicity’, Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 1–19.
Dowty, David: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Hinrichs, Erhard: 1985, A Compositional Semantics for Aktionsarten and NP Reference in English, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.
Hinrichs, Erhard: 1986, ‘Temporal Anaphora in Discourses of English’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 63–82.
Jackendoff, Ray: 1990, Semantic Structures, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Kamp, Hans: 1991. The Perfect and Other Tenses in French and English, unpublished manuscript, University of Stuttgart.
Kamp, Hans and Reyle, Uwe: 1993. From Discourse to Logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Kamp, Hans and Rohrer, Christian: 1983, ‘Tense in Texts’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, de Gruytet, Berlin, pp. 250–269.
Krifka, Manfred: 1989, ‘Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution, and Quantification in Event Semantics’, in R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expressions, pp. 75–115, Foris, Dordrecht.
Krifka, Manfred: 1992, ‘Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution’, in I. Sag and A. Szabolesi (eds.), Lexical Matters, CSLI Publications Stanford, CA, pp. 29–53.
Landman, Fred: 1992, ‘The Progressive’, Natural Language Semantics 1, 1–32.
Lascarides, Alex: 1988, A Formal Semantic Analysis of the Progressive, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
Lascarides, Alex and Nicholas Asher: 1993, ‘Temporal Interpretation, Discourse Relations and Commonsense Entailment’, Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 437–493.
Link, Godehard: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms, A Lattice-Theoretic Approach’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302–323.
Moens, Marc: 1987, Tense, Aspect and Temporal Reference, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
Moltmann, Friederike: 1992, ‘Measure Adverbials’, Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 629–660.
Mourclatos, Alexander: 1978, ‘Events, Processes and States’, Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 415–434.
Naumann, Ralph: 1995, Aspectual Composition and Dynamic Logic, unpublished dissertation, Ph.D. Düsseldorf.
Parsons, Terence: 1991, Events in the Semantics of English, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Pelletier, Jeff: 1979, Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Piñón, Chris: 1995, An Ontology for Event Semantics, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Pustejovsky, James: 1995, The Generative Lexicon, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ramchand, Gillian: 1993, Aspect and Argument Structure in Scottish Gaelic, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford.
Smith, Carlota: 1991, The Parameter of Aspect, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
de Swart, Henriëtte: 1991, Adverbs of Quantification: A Generalized Quantifier Appproach, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen, published by Garland, New York, 1993.
de Swart, Henriëtte and Arie Molendijk: 1996, Negation and the Temporal Structure of Narrative Discourse, unpublished manuscript, Stanford University/University of Groningen.
Vendler, Zeno: 1957, ‘Verbs and Times’, in Z. Vendler (ed.) (1967), Linguistic in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 97–121.
Verkuyl, Henk: 1972, On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Verkuyl, Henk: 1993, A Theory of Aspectuality: The Interaction between Temporal and Attemporal Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Vet, Co: 1980, Temps, aspect et adverbes de temps en français contemporain, Droz, Genève.
Vet, Co: 1992, ‘Le passé composé, contextes d'emploi et interprétation’, Cahiers de Praxématique 19, 37–59.
Vet, Co: 1994a, ‘Future Tense and Discourse Representation’, in C. Vet and C. Vetters (eds.), Tense and Aspect in Discourse, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 49–76.
Vet, Co: 1994b, ‘Petite grammaire de l'Aktionsart et de l'aspect’, Cahiers de Grammaire 19, 1–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Swart, H. Aspect Shift and Coercion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16, 347–385 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005916004600
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005916004600