Skip to main content
Log in

Are Some Psychotherapies Much More Effective Than Others?

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies

Abstract

In a previous paper we had reported on the examination of comparisons of 18 metaanalyses of active treatments with each other (Luborsky, Rosenthal, Diguer, et al., 2001). These metaanalyses gave a small and nonsignificant mean level of difference between types of treatments. The smallness of this correlation confirms Rosenzweig's (1936) expectation that because of the large overlap in effective ingredients of different psychotherapies, comparative studies of psychotherapies would show little difference. Such a comparison that includes psychoanalyses seems a long way off, but if outcomes of psychoanalyses are defined similarly to those in the other psychotherapies, the expected differences in outcomes may also be small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berman, J. S., Miller, C. R., and Massman, P. J. (1985). Cognitive therapy versus systematic desensitization: Is one treatment superior? Psychological Bulletin, 97, 451–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, S. J. (1992). The differential effect of psychotherapy and psychoanalysis on anaclitic and introjective patients: The Menninger Foundation Psychotherapy Research Project revisited. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 40, 691–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crits-Christoph, P. (1992). The efficacy of brief dynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber and Klug (in preparation)

  • Luborsky, L. (1995). Are common factors across different psychotherapies the main explanation for the Dodo Bird verdict that “Everyone has won so all shall have prizes?” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 106–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky, L., Diguer, L., Luborsky, E., Singer, B., and Dickter, D. (1993). The efficacy of dynamic psychotherapies. Is it true that everyone has won so all shall have prizes?' In N. Miller, L. Luborsky, J.P. Barber, & J. Docherty (Eds.), Psychodynamic treatment research: A handbook for clinical practice (pp. 447–514). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky, L., Diguer, L., Seligman, D. A., Rosenthal, R., Johnson, S., Halperin, G., Bishop, M., and Schweizer, E. (1999). The researcher's own therapeutic allegiances—A “wild card” in comparisons of treatment efficacy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 95–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky, L., RosenthalR., Diguer, L., Andrusyna, T. P., Levitt, J. T., Seligman, D. A., Berman, J., and Krause, E. D. (in press). The Dodo Bird verdict is alive and well—mostly. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice.

  • Luborsky, L., Rosenthal, R., Andrusyna, T., Berman, J., and Shapiro, D. A. (in preparation). Recommendations for minimizing researcher's allegiance problems in comparisons of psychotherapies

  • Miller, R. C. and Berman, J. S. (1983). The efficacy of cognitive-behavior therapies: A quantitative review of the research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L. A., Berman, J. S., and Neimeyer, R. A. (1990). Psychotherapy for the treatment of depression: A comprehensive review of controlled outcome research. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 30–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, S. (1936). Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 6, 412–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandell, R., Blomberg, J., and Lazar, A. (1999). Reported long-term follow-up of long-term psychotherapies and psychoanalyses. First results of the “Stockholm Outcome of Psychotherapy (STOP) Project.” [German]. [Journal Article] Zeitschrift Fuer Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychoanalyse, 45, 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svartberg, M. and Stiles, T. C., (1991). Comparative effects of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 704–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, R. (1986). Forty-two lives in treatment–a study of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E., Mondin, G. W., Moody, M., Stich, F., Benson, K., and Ahn, H. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically, “all must have prizes.” Psychological Bulletin, 122, 203–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luborsky, L., Rosenthal, R., Diguer, L. et al. Are Some Psychotherapies Much More Effective Than Others?. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies 5, 455–460 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026023715740

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026023715740

Navigation