Skip to main content
Log in

Backbends in Directed Percolation

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When directed percolation in a bond percolation process does not occur, any path to infinity on the open bonds will zigzag back and forth through the lattice. Backbends are the portions of the zigzags that go against the percolation direction. They are important in the physical problem of particle transport in random media in the presence of a field, as they act to limit particle flow through the medium. The critical probability for percolation along directed paths with backbends no longer than a given length n is defined as p n. We prove that (p n) is strictly decreasing and converges to the critical probability for undirected percolation p c. We also investigate some variants of the basic model, such as by replacing the standard d-dimensional cubic lattice with a (d−1)-dimensional slab or with a Bethe lattice; and we discuss the mathematical consequences of alternative ways to formalize the physical concepts of “percolation” and “backbend.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M. Aizenman and G. Grimmett, Strict monotonicity for critical points in percolation and ferromagnetic models, J. Stat. Phys. 63:817–835 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Barma and R. Ramaswamy, On backbends on percolation backbones, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 19:L605-L611 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Durrett, Oriented percolation in two dimensions, Ann. Prob. 12:999–1040 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Durrett, Lecure notes on particle systems and percolation (Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, California, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Gandolfi, M. S. Keane, and C. M. Newman, Uniqueness of the infinite component in a random graph with applications to percolation and spin glasses, Prob. Th. Rel. Fields 92:511–527 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. R. Grimmett, Percolation (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. R. Grimmett, Percolation and Disordered Systems. Ecole d'été de Probabilités de Saint-Flour, XXVI (Springer LNM 1665, 1997).

  8. T. M. Liggett, R. H. Schonmann, and A. M. Stacey, Domination by product measures, Ann. Probab. 25:71–95 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. V. Menshikov, Quantitative estimates and rigorous inequalities for critical points of a graph and its subgraphs, Theory Prob. Appl. 32:544–547 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. J. Mode, Multitype Branching Processes: Theory and Applications (American Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Ramaswamy and M. Barma, Transport in random networks in a field: Interacting particles, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20:2973–2987 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Stacey, Bounds on the critical probability in oriented percolation models (Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 1994).

  13. J. C. Wierman, Bond percolation on honeycomb and triangular lattices, Adv. Appl. Prob. 13:298–313 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roy, R., Sarkar, A. & White, D.G. Backbends in Directed Percolation. Journal of Statistical Physics 91, 889–908 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023075815581

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023075815581

Navigation