Skip to main content
Log in

Improving Penalized Least Squares through Adaptive Selection of Penalty and Shrinkage

  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimation of the mean function in nonparametric regression is usefully separated into estimating the means at the observed factor levels—a one-way layout problem—and interpolation between the estimated means at adjacent factor levels. Candidate penalized least squares (PLS) estimators for the mean vector of a one-way layout are expressed as shrinkage estimators relative to an orthogonal regression basis determined by the penalty matrix. The shrinkage representation of PLS suggests a larger class of candidate monotone shrinkage (MS) estimators. Adaptive PLS and MS estimators choose the shrinkage vector and penalty matrix to minimize estimated risk. The actual risks of shrinkage-adaptive estimators depend strongly upon the economy of the penalty basis in representing the unknown mean vector. Local annihilators of polynomials, among them difference operators, generate penalty bases that are economical in a range of examples. Diagnostic techniques for adaptive PLS or MS estimators include basis-economy plots and estimates of loss or risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, D. F. and Herzberg, A. M. (1985). Data: A Collection of Problems from Many Fields for the Student and Research Worker, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beran, R. (1996). Confidence sets centered at C p estimators, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 48, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beran, R. (2000). REACT scatterplot smoothers: Superefficiency through basis economy, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 63, 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beran, R. and Dümbgen, L. (1998). Modulation of estimators and confidence sets, Ann. Statist., 26, 1826–1856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buja, A., Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. (1989). Linear smoothers and additive models (with discussion), Ann. Statist., 17, 453–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, C.-K. and Marron, J. S. (1991). Choosing a kernel regression estimator, Statist. Sci., 6, 404–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, N. E. and Ramsay, J. O. (2000). Penalized regression with model-based penalties, Canad. J. Statist., 28, 241–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallows, C. L. (1973). Some comments on C p, Technometrics, 15, 661–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsker, M. S. (1980). Optimal filtration of square-integrable signals in Gaussian noise, Problems Inform. Transmission, 16, 120–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. (1984). Bandwidth choice for nonparametric regression, Ann. Statist., 12, 1215–1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T., Wright, F. T. and Dykstra, R. L. (1988). Order Restricted Statistical Inference, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonoff, J. S. (1996). Smoothing Methods in Statistics, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, C. (1956). Inadmissibility of the usual estimator for the mean of a multivariate normal distribution, Proc. Third Berkeley Symp. on Math. Statist. Prob., Vol. 1 (ed. J. Neyman), 197–206, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, C. (1981). Estimation of the mean of a multivariate normal distribution, Ann. Statist., 9, 1135–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venables, W. N. and Ripley, B. D. (1999). Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS, 3rd ed., Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Beran, R. Improving Penalized Least Squares through Adaptive Selection of Penalty and Shrinkage. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 54, 900–917 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022479822263

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022479822263

Navigation