Skip to main content
Log in

Modified Maximum Likelihood Estimators Based on Ranked Set Samples

  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The maximum livelihood estimator (MLE) using a ranked set sample (RSS) usually has no closed expression because the maximum likelihood equation involves both hazard and inverse hazard functions, and may no longer be efficient when the judgment ranking is imperfect. In this paper, we consider a modified MLE (MMLE) using RSS for general parameters, which has the same expression as the MLE using a simple random sample (SRS), except that the SRS in the MLE is replaced by the RSS. The results show that, for the location parameter, the MMLE is always more efficient than the MLE using SRS, and for the scale parameter, the MMLE is at least as efficient as the MLE using SRS, when the same sample size is used. Under the perfect judgment ranking, numerical examples also show that the MMLE has good efficiency relative to the MLE based on RSS. When the judgment error is present, we conduct simulations to show that the MMLE is more robust than the MLE using RSS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Saleh, M. F. and Al-Kadiri, M. (2000). Double ranked set sampling, Statist. Probab. Lett., 48, 205–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Saleh, M. F. and Zheng, G. (2002). Estimation of bivariate characteristics using ranked set sampling, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 44, 221–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, Z. and Chen, Z. (2000). On the theory of ranked-set sampling and its ramifications, J. Statist. Plann. Inference (to appear).

  • Barnett, V. (1999). Ranked set sample design for environmental investigations, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 6, 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, G. K. (1985). The asymptotics of maximum likelihood and related estimators based on type II censored data, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 80, 398–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, L. L. and Wolfe, D. A. (1994). The effect of imperfect judgment rankings on properties of procedures based on the ranked set samples analog of the Mann-Whitey-Wilcoxon statistic, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 89, 168–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. (2000). The efficiency of ranked-set sampling relative to simple random sampling under multi-parameter families, Statistica Sinica, 10, 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, H. A. and Levine, D. N. (1972). Ranked set sampling in the presence of Judgment error, Biometrics, 28, 553–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, T. R. and Clutter, J. L. (1972). Ranked-set sampling theory with order statistics background, Biometrics, 28, 545–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Neweihi, E. and Sinha, B. K. (2000). Reliability estimation based on ranked set sampling, Comm. Statist. Theory Method, 29, 1583–1595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godambe, V. P. (1960). An optimum property of regular maximum likelihood estimation, Ann. Math. Statist., 31, 1208–1212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godambe, V. P. (1991). Estimating Functions (ed. V. P. Godambe), Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettmansperger, T. P. (1995). The ranked-set sampling sign test, J. Nonparametr. Statist., 4, 263–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvam, P. H. and Samaniego, F. J. (1993). On maximum likelihood estimation based on ranked set sampling, with applications to reliability, Advances in Reliability (ed. A. Basu), 215–229, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvam, P. H. and Samaniego, F. J. (1994). Nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation based on ranked set samples, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 89, 526–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E. L. (1983). Theory of Point Estimation, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, G. A. (1952). A method for unbiased selective sampling using ranked sets, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 3, 385–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, K. G. and Nanda, P. (1974). Unbiased estimation of parameters by order statistics in the case of censored samples, Biometrika, 61, 601–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, G. P., Sinha, A. K. and Taillie, C. (1999). Ranked set sampling: A bibliography, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 6, 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, B. K., Sinha, R. K. and Purkayastha, S. (1996). On some aspects of ranked set sampling for estimation of normal and exponential parameters, Statist. Decisions, 14, 223–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, S. L. (1980). Estimation of variance using judgment ordered ranked set samples, Biometrics, 26, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, S. L. (1995). Parametric ranked set sampling, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 47, 465–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, S. L. and Sager, T. W. (1988). Characterizations of a ranked-set sample with application to estimating distribution functions, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 83, 374–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahasi, K. and Wakimoto, K. (1968). On unbiased estimates of the population mean based on the sample stratified by means of ordering, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 20, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P. L. H. and Lam, K. (1997). Regression estimator in ranked set sampling, Biometrics, 53, 1070–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, G. (2000). Some remarks on Fisher information in a ranked set sample (submitted).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, G., Al-Saleh, M.F. Modified Maximum Likelihood Estimators Based on Ranked Set Samples. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 54, 641–658 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022475413950

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022475413950

Navigation