Skip to main content
Log in

Partition-Weighted Monte Carlo Estimation

  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although various efficient and sophisticated Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling methods have been developed during the last decade, the sample mean is still a dominant in computing Bayesian posterior quantities. The sample mean is simple, but may not be efficient. The weighted sample mean is a natural generalization of the sample mean. In this paper, a new weighted sample mean is proposed by partitioning the support of posterior distribution, so that the same weight is assigned to observations that belong to the same subset in the partition. A novel application of this new weighted sample mean in computing ratios of normalizing constants and necessary theory are provided. Illustrative examples are given to demonstrate the methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger, J. O. and Pericchi, L. R. (1996). The intrinsic Bayes factor for model selection and prediction, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 91, 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casella, G. and Robert, C. P. (1996). Rao-Blackwellization of sampling schemes, Biometrika, 83, 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casella, G. and Robert, C. P. (1998). Post-processing accept-reject samples: Recycling and rescaling, J. Comput. Graph. Statist., 7, 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-H. and Shao, Q.-M. (1997). On Monte Carlo methods for estimating ratios of normalizing constants, Ann. Statist., 25, 1563–1594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-H., Ibrahim, J. G. and Yiannoutsos, C. (1999). Prior elicitation, variable selection, and Bayesian computation for logistic regression models, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 61, 223–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S. (1995). Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 90, 1313–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A. and Meng, X.-L. (1998). Simulating normalizing constants: From importance sampling to bridge sampling to path sampling, Statist. Sci., 13, 163–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, E. I. and McCulloch, R. E. (1993). Variable selection via Gibbs sampling, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 88, 881–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, E. I. and McCulloch, R. E. (1997). Approaches for Bayesian variable selection, Statist. Sinica, 7, 339–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geweke, J. (1994). Bayesian comparison of econometric models, Tech. Report, No. 532, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and University of Minnesota.

  • Geyer, C. J. (1994). Estimating normalizing constants and reweighting mixtures in Markov chain Monte Carlo, Revision of Tech. Report No. 568, School of Statistics, University of Minnesota.

  • Hammersley, J. M. and Handscomb, D. C. (1964). Monte Carlo Methods, Methuen, London.

  • Kass, R. E. and Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 90, 773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. S., Liang, F. and Wong, W. H. (1998). Dynamic weighting in Markov chain Monte Carlo, Tech. Report, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, X.-L. and Wong, W. H. (1996). Simulating ratios of normalizing constants via a simple identity: A theoretical exploration, Statist. Sinica, 6, 831–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merigan, T. C., Amato, D. A., Balsley, J., Power, M., Price, W. A., Benoit, S., Perez-Michael, A., Brownstein, A., Kramer, A. S., Brettler, D., Aledort, L., Ragni, M. V., Andes, A. W., Gill, J. C., Goldsmith, J., Stabler, S., Sanders, N., Gjerset, G., Lusher, J. and the NHF-ACTG036 Study Group (1991). Placebo-controlled trial to evaluate zidovudine in treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection in asymptomatic patients with hemophilia, Blood, 78, 900–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H. and Teller, E. (1953). Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines, Journal of Chemical Physics, 21, 1087–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, L. (1998). Normalizing constant estimation for discrete distribution simulation, Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Management Science and Information System, University of Texas at Austin (unpublished).

  • Thompson, S. K. (1992). Sampling, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrie, G. M. and Valleau, J. P. (1977). Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling, Journal of Chemical Physics, 23, 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, H. F. and Tukey, J. W. (1956). Conditional Monte Carlo for normal samples, Symposium on Monte Carlo Methods (ed. H. A. Meyer), Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, W. H. and Liang, F. (1997). Dynamic weighting in Monte Carlo and optimization, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 94, 14220–14224.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, MH., Shao, QM. Partition-Weighted Monte Carlo Estimation. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 54, 338–354 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022426103047

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022426103047

Navigation