Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contrast and Post-Velar Fronting in Russian

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a well-known rule of Russianwhereby /i/ is said to be realized as [į] after non-palatalized consonants. Somewhat less well known is another allophonic rule of Russian whereby only [i], and not [į], can follow velars within a morphological word. This latter rule came about due to a sound change in East Slavic called post-velar fronting here: kį > kji(and similarlyfor the other velars). This paper examines this sound change in depth, and argues that it can be adequately explained only by appeal to the functional notions of perceptual distinctiveness of contrast and neutralization avoidance. Further, these notions crucially require a systemic approach to phonology, in which the wellformedness of any form must be evaluated with reference to the larger system of contrasts it enters into. These notions are formalized in a modified version of Dispersion Theory (Flemming 1995a), a systemic theory that incorporates these functional notions into Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Stephen R. 1985. Phonology in the Twentieth Century, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avanesov, Ruben Ivanovich. 1947. ‘Iz istorii russkogo vokalizma’, Vestnik MGU 1, 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avanesov, Ruben Ivanovich, and Vladimir Nikolaevich Sidorov. 1945. Ocherk grammatiki russkogo literaturnogo iazyka, chast' 1: fonetika i morfologia, Gosudarstvennoe uchebno-pedagogicheskoe Izdatel'stvo, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, D. N. S. 1978. ‘A General Study of Palatalization’, in Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language, Volume 2: Phonology, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 47–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boersma, Paul. 1998. Functional Phonology: Formalizing the Interactions between Articulatory and Perceptual Drives, Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkovskii, Viktor Ivanovich and Petr Savvich Kuznetsov. 1963. Istoricheskaia grammatika russkogo iazyka, Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Lyle. 1999. Historical Linguistics: An Introduction, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R., B. Granström and Gunnar Fant. 1970. ‘Some Studies Concerning Perception of Isolated Vowels’, Speech Transmission Laboratory - Quarterly Progress and Status Report 2-3, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, pp. 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, Terence R. 1991. Introduction to the Phonological History of the Slavic Languages, Slavica, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernykh, P. Ja. 1962. Istoricheskaia grammatika russkogo iazyka, Gosudarstvennoe Uchebno-Pedagogicheskoe Izdatel'stvo Ministerstva Prosveshcheniia RSFSR, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Romaine, Dorothy Kathleen. 1998. Palatalization and Coarticulation in Russian, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.

  • Fant, Gunnar. 1960. Acoustic Theory of Speech Production, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina, Donna Marie. 1991. Palatalization and jers in Modern Russian Phonology: An Underspecification Approach, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

  • Filin, Fedot Petrovich. 1972. Proiskhozhdenie russkogo, ukrainskogo i belorusskogo iazykov, Nauka, Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, Edward. 1995a. Auditory Representations in Phonology, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Flemming, Edward. 1995b. ‘Phonetic Detail in Phonology: Evidence from Assimilation and Coarticulation’, in K. Suzuki and D. Elzinga (eds.), Proceedings of the Arizona Conference: Workshop on Features in Optimality Theory: Coyote Working Papers, University of Arizona, Tuscon, pp. 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, Edward. 1999. ‘How to Formalize Constraints on Perceptual Distinctiveness’, handout of paper presented at ‘The Role of Speech Perception Phenomena in Phonology’, a satellite workshop to International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, Edward. 2001. ‘Scalar and Categorical Phenomena in a Unified Model of Phonetics and Phonology’, Phonology 18, 7–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flier, Michael S. 1982. ‘Morphophonemic Change as Evidence of Phonemic Change: The Status of the Sharped Velars in Russian’, International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 25, 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gess, Randall. 2000. ‘On Constraint Re-Ranking in Phonological Change’, unpublished manuscript, University of Utah.

  • Guion, Susan Guignard. 1998. ‘The Role of Perception in the Sound Change of Velar Palatalization’, Phonetica 55, 18–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, Gregory R. 1996. ‘Form and Function in Linguistic Variation’, in G. R. Guy, C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin and J. Baugh (eds.), Towards a Social Science of Language: Papers in Honor of William Labov, Volume 1: Variation and Change in Language and Society, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 221–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gvozdev, A. N. 1949. O fonologicheskikh sredstvakh russkogo iazyka: sbornik statei, Izdatel'stvo akademii pedagogicheskikh nauk RSFSR, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, Morris. 1959. The Sound Pattern of Russian, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, Morris. 1962. ‘Phonology in Generative Grammar’, Word 18, 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, William S. 1980. Introduction to Russian Phonology and Word Structure, Slavica, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, John A. and Murray Gell-Mann (eds.). 1992. The Evolution of Human Languages, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Bruce. 1999. ‘Phonetically-driven Phonology: The Role of Optimality Theory and Inductive Grounding’, in M. Darnell, E. Moravscik, M. Noonan, F. Newmeyer and K. Wheatly (eds.), Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Volume 1: General Papers, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 243–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoard, James and G. N. O'Grady. 1976. ‘Nyangumarda Phonology: A Preliminary Report’, in R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra, pp. 51–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, Eric. 1997. The Role of the Listener in the Historical Phonology of Spanish and Portuguese: An Optimality-Theoretic Account, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University.

  • Hutton, John. 1996. ‘Optimality Theory and Historical Language Change’, unpublished manuscript, University of Manchester.

  • Ivanov, Valerii Vasil'evich. 1990. Istoricheskaia grammatika russkogo iazyka, Prosveshchenie, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, Roman. 1929. ‘Remarques sur lévolution phonologique du russe comparée à celle des autres langues slaves’, Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague 2. [In Roman Jakobson. 1962. Selected Writings, Volume 1: Phonological Studies, Mouton, 's-Gravenhge, pp. 7–116.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, Patricia and Aditi Lahiri. 1993. ‘Fronted Velars, Palatalized velars, and Palatals’, Phonetica 50, 73–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, John and Randy L. Diehl. 1994. ‘Phonetic Knowledge’, Language 70, 419–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1982a. ‘Lexical Phonology and Morphology’, in I. S. Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Hanshin, Seoul, pp. 3–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1982b. Explanation in Phonology, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1985. ‘Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology’, Phonology 2, 85–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1995. ‘The Phonological Basis of Sound Change’, in J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, pp. 640–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. ‘Paradigm Effects and Opacity’, unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.

  • Kirby, Simon. 1999. Function, Selection, and Innateness: The Emergence of Language Universals, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, Robert. 1996. ‘Synchronic Chain Shifts in Optimality Theory’, Linguistic Inquiry 27, 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, Robert. 1997. ‘Contrastiveness and Faithfulness’, Phonology 14, 83–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, Robert. 2001. ‘Phonological Contrast and Articulatory Effort’, in L. Lombardi (ed.), Segmental Phonology in Optimality Theory: Constraints and Representations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 79–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, K. J. 1990. ‘Segmental Reduction in Connected Speech in German: Phonological Facts and Phonetic Explanations’, in W. J. Hardcastle and A. Marchal (eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modelling, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Language Change, Volume 1: Internal Factors, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged, Peter. 1993. A Course in Phonetics, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged, Peter and Ian Maddieson. 1996. The Sounds of the World's Languages, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liljencrants, Johan and Björn Lindblom. 1972. ‘Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast’, Language 48, 839–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, B. 1986. ‘Phonetic Universals in Vowel Systems’, in J. Ohala and J. Jaeger (eds.), Experimental Phonology, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 13–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Björn. 1990. ‘Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory’, in W. J. Hardcastle and A. Marchal (eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modelling, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 403–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuel, Sharon. 1990. ‘The Role of Contrast in Limiting Vowel-to-Vowel Coarticulation in Different Languages’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88, 1286–1298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinet, André. 1952. ‘Function, Structure, and Sound Change’, Word 8, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinet, André. 1964. Elements of General Linguistics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinet, Andrée. 1974. Economía de los cambios phonéticos, Editorial Gredos, Madrid. [Translation into Spanish of Économie des changements phonétiques, 1955.]

  • McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince. 1993. ‘Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction’, unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.

  • McCarthy, John J. and Alan S. Prince. 1995. ‘Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity’, in J. Beckman, S. Urbanczyk and L. Walsh (eds.), University of MA Occasional Papers in Linguistics (UMOP) 18, GLSA, Amherst, MA, pp. 249–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meillet, Antoine. 1951. Obshcheslavianskii iazyk, Izdatel'stvo Innostrannoi literatury, Moscow. [Translation into Russian of Le Slave Commun, 2nd edition].

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, Daniel. 1999. Linguistic Diversity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ní Chiosáin, Máire and Jaye Padgett. 1993. ‘Inherent VPlace’, Linguistics Research Center Report LRC-93-09, University of CA, Santa Cruz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ní Chiosáin, Máire and Jaye Padgett. 2001. ‘Markedness, Segment Realization, and Locality in Spreading’, in L. Lombardi (ed.), iSegmental Phonology in Optimality Theory: Constraints and Representations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 118–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohala, John J. 1983. ‘The Origin of Sound Patterns in Vocal Tract Constraints’, in P. MacNeilage (ed.), The Production of Speech, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 189–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohala, John J. 1989. ‘Sound Change is Drawn from a Pool of Synchronic Variation’, in L. E. Breivik and E. H. Jahr (eds.), Language Change: Contributions to the Study of Its Causes, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 173–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohala, John J. 1990. ‘The Phonetics and Phonology of Aspects of Assimilation’, in J. Kingston and M. Beckman (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology, Volume 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 258–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thman, S. E. G. 1966. ‘Coarticulation in VCV Utterances: Spectrographic Measurements’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 39, 151–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, Jaye. 1997. ‘Perceptual Distance of Contrast: Vowel Height and Nasality’, in R. Walker, M. Katayama and D. Karvonen (eds.), Phonology at Santa Cruz, Volume 5, Linguistics Research Center, University of California, Santa Cruz, pp. 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, Jaye. 2001. ‘Contrast Dispersion and Russian Palatalization’, in E. V. Hume and K. Johnson (eds.), The Role of Speech Perception Phenomena in Phonology, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 187–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, Jaye. to appear. ‘The Emergence of Contrastive Palatalization in Russian’, in E. Holt (ed.), Optimality Theory and Language Change, Kluwer Academic Press.

  • Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky. 1993. ‘Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar’, unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, and University of Colorado, Boulder.

  • Purcell, Edward T. 1979. ‘Formant Frequency Patterns in Russian VCV Utterances, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66, 1691–1702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reformatskii, Aleksandr Aleksandrovich. 1957. ‘Fonologicheskie zametki’, Voprosy iazykoznania 2, 101–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reformatskii, Aleksandr Aleksandrovich. 1958. ‘O korrelatsii “tverdykh” i “miagkikh” soglasnykh (v sovremennom russkom literaturnom iazyke)’, in Mélanges linguistiques offerts à Emil Petrovici par ses amis étrangers a l'occasion de son soixantième anniversaire, Editura Academiei Republicii Populare Romine, Bucharest, pp. 494–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubach, Jerzy. 2000. ‘Backness Switch in Russian’, Phonology 17, 39–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Nathan. To appear-a. ‘Preserving Synchronic Parallelism: Diachrony and Opacity in Polish’, in M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston and S. Neuvel (eds.), iCLS 37: The Main Session. Papers from the 37th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Volume 1, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago. [Also handout of paper presented at the Third Generative Linguistics in Poland Conference, Warsaw, Poland, 2001.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Nathan. To appear-b. Opacity and Sound Change in the Polish Lexicon, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.

  • Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1959. Course in General Linguistics, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaarschmidt, Gunter. 1998. A Historical Phonology of the Upper and Lower Sorbian Languages, Universitätsverlag C. Winter, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenker, Alexander M. 1993. ‘Proto-Slavonic’, in B. Comrie and G. G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic Languages, Routledge, London, pp. 60–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Jean-Luc, Louis-Jean Boë, Nathalie Vallée and Christian Abry. 1997a. ‘The Dispersion-focalization Theory of Vowel Systems’, Journal of Phonetics 25, 255–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Jean-Luc, Louis-Jean Boë, Nathalie Vallée and Christian Abry. 1997b. ‘Major Trends in Vowel System Inventories’, Journal of Phonetics 25, 233–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevelov, George Y. 1965. A Prehistory of Slavic, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, Paul. 1995. ‘On the Internal Structure of the Constraint Component Con of UG’, handout of talk given at University of Arizona.

  • Steriade, Donca. 1994. ‘Complex Onsets as Single Segments: The Mazateco Pattern’, in J. Cole and C. Kisseberth (eds.), iPerspectives in Phonology, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 203–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steriade, Donca. 1995. ‘Underspecification and Markedness’, in J. Goldsmith (ed.), Handbook of Phonological Theory, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, pp. 114–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steriade, Donca. 1997. ‘Phonetics in Phonology: The Case of Laryngeal Neutralization’, unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Stevens, Kenneth and Samuel Jay Keyser. 1989. ‘Primary Features and Their Enhancements in Consonants’, Language 65, 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, Kenneth N., Samuel Jay Keyser and Haruko Kawasaki. 1986. ‘Toward a Phonetic and Phonological Theory of Redundant Features’, in J. S. Perkell and D. H. Klatt (eds.), Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 426–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stieber, Zdzislaw. 1968. The Phonological Development of Polish, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

  • Sussex, Roland. 1992. ‘Russian’, in W. Bright (ed.), International Encylopedia of Linguistics, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 350–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake, Alan. 1978. ‘K istorii zadnenebnykh fonem v severoslavianskikh iazykakh’, in H. Birnbaum (ed.), American Contributions to the Eighth International Congress of Slavists, Volume 1: Linguistics and Poetics, Slavica, Columbus, OH, pp. 699–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, Charles E. and Laura A. Janda. 1996. Common and Comparative Slavic: Phonology and Inflection, Slavica Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trubetzkoy, Nikolai. 1969. Principles of Phonology, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. T. 1986. ‘The Behavior of Nasalized Vowels in the Perceptual Vowel Space’, in J. Ohala and J. Jaeger (eds.), Experimental Phonology, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoll, Cheryl. 1996. ‘Consonant Mutation in Bantu’, Linguistic Inquiry 26.3, 536–545.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics Stevenson College, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA E-mail

    Jaye Padgett

Authors
  1. Jaye Padgett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Padgett, J. Contrast and Post-Velar Fronting in Russian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21, 39–87 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021879906505

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021879906505

Keywords

Search

Navigation