Abstract
Unconditional non-asymptotic methods for comparing two independent binomial proportions have the drawback that they take a rather long time to compute. This problem is especially acute in the most powerful version of the method (Barnard, 1947). Thus, despite being the version which originated the method, it has hardly ever been used. This paper presents various properties which allow the computation time to be drastically reduced, thus enabling one to use not only the more traditional and simple versions given by McDonald et al. (1977) and Garside and Mack (1967), but also the more complex original version of Barnard (1947).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnard, G. A. (1947) Significance tests for 2 x 2 tables. Biometrika, 34, 123–38.
Berger, R. L. (1996) More powerful tests from confidence interval p values. The American Statistician, 50 (4), 314–8.
Fisher, R. A. (1935) The logic of inductive inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 98, 39–54.
Garside, G. R. and Mack, C. (1967) Correct confidence limits for the 2 x 2 homogeneity contingency table with small frequencies. New Journal of Statistics and Operations Research, 3(2), 1–25.
Haber, M. (1986) An exact unconditional test for the 2 x 2 comparative trial. Psychometrics Bull, 99 (1), 129–32.
Haber, M. (1987) A comparison of some conditional and unconditional exact tests for 2 x 2 contingency tables'. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computing, 16(4), 999–1013.
Liddell, D. (1976) Practical test of 2 x 2 tables. Statistician, 25(4), 295–304.
Martí n André s, A. (1991) A review of classic non-asymptotic methods for comparing two proportions by means of independent samples. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 20 (2 & 3), 551–83.
Martí n André s, A. and Silva Mato, A. (1994) Choosing the optimal unconditioned test for comparing two independent proportions. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 17, 555–74.
McDonald, L. L., Davis, B. M. and Milliken, G. A. (1977) A non-randomized unconditional test for comparing two proportions in a 2 x 2 contingency table. Technometrics, 19, 145–50.
McDonald, L. L., Davis, B. M., Bauer, H. R.(III) and Laby, B. (1981) Algorithm AS161: Critical Regions of an unconditional non-randomized test of homogeneity in 2 x 2 contingency tables. Applied Statistics, 30(2), 182–9.
Richardson, J. T. E. (1994) The analysis of 2 x 1 and 2 x 2 contingency tables: an historical review. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 3, 107–33.
Sahai, H. and Khurshid, A. (1995) On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2 x 2 contingency table: an overview of Fisher's exact test and Yates' correction for continuity. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 5(1), 43–70.
Schawe, D. (1977) Error probabilities for 2 x 2 contingency table American Statistician, 31(3), 134.
Shuster, J. J. (1988) EXACTB and CONF: Exact unconditional procedures for binomial data. The American Statistician, 42(3), 234.
Silva Mato, A. and Martí n André s, A. (1995) Optimal unconditional tables for comparing two independent proportions. Biometrical Journal, 37(7), 821–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mato, A.S., Andrés, A.M. Simplifying the calculation of the P-value for Barnard's test and its derivatives. Statistics and Computing 7, 137–143 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018573716156
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018573716156