Abstract
Rural settlements in Hungary account for 93% of all settlements and 37% of the country's population. Since 1989 they are scenes of spectacular changes. Based on some case studies of less developed villages this paper considers the most important characteristics of the post-socialist rural transformation by examining the local economy and living conditions. The main issues are how local actors (for example, economic corporations, households and individuals) have been affected by the interaction of supralocal and local factors and how they responded to them. Such responses can be considered to be manifestations of survival strategy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andorka R., 1996: Gazdasági, társadalmi változások és problémák a mai magyar falvakban (Social, economic changes and problems in today's Hungarian villages). A falu 4: 7–17.
Beluszky P., 1999: Magyarország településföldrajza I. (Settlement geography of Hungary I.), Dialóg Campus Kiadó, Budapest.
Cloke P. and Goodwin M., 1992: Conceptualising countryside change: from post-Fordism to rural structured coherence.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 17: 321–337.
Enyedi Gy., 1992: A magyar falu-nyertes, vesztes? (The Hungarian villagewinner or loser?). Társadalmi Szemle 8–9: 39–48.
F. E. Hamilton I., 1995: Re-evaluating space: Locational change and adjustment in Central and Eastern Europe. Geographische Zeitschrift 2: 67–87.
Kiss É., 1989: A Közép-Tiszavidék megyehatár menti településeinek gazdasági fejlodése és közigazgatási területbeosztása (Economic Development and Administrative Divisions of Settlements by County Border in the Mid-Tisza Region). Alföldi tanulmányok 13: 169–185.
Kiss É., 1992: A szellemi potenciál jellemzõje a Közép-Tiszavidéken (Some characteristics of the intellectual potential in the Mid-Tisza Region). Alföldi Tanulmányok 14: 139–157.
Kiss É., 1996: Az egyéni vállalkozások elõzményei és területi sajátosságai Magyarországon (Characteristics and spatial distribution of private enterprises in Hungary). Földrajzi Értesítõ 3–4: 253–283.
Le Heron R., Roche M. and Johnston T., 1992: The reregulation of New Zealand agriculture and its implications for a restatement of policy and planning agendas. Progress in Rural Policy and Planning 2: 27–281.
Mészáros R., 1988: A helyi hatalom minõsége és a település sorsa (The quality of local government and the fate of the settlement). In: Csefkó F. and Szirtes G. (eds), Településfejlesztés, helyi társadalom, önkormányzat (Regional development, local society, local government), pp. 70–73. MTA RKK, Pécs.
Rey V. and Bachvarov M. 1998: Rural settlements in transition-agricultural and countryside crisis in Central-Eastern Europe. GeoJournal 4: 345–353.
Shaw J.M. (ed.), 1979: Rural deprivation and planning. GeoBooks, Norwich.
Sofer M. and Bordanc F., 1998: Opportunities, constraints and pluriactivity in rural Romania during the transition period: preliminary observations. GeoJournal 4: 283–296.
Soja E., 1987: The postmodernization of geography: A review. Ann. Asso. Am. Geogr. 2: 289–294.
Tykkyläinen M. (ed.), 1998: Rural survival strategies in transitional countries. Karelian Institute, Joensuu.
Varis E., 1997: A need of the local study-Theoretical aspects of studying transition in postsocialist countryside. Univeristy of Joensuu, Joensuu.
Virkkala S., 1994: Restructuring, localities and old industrial towns in Finland. In: Doling J., Koskiaho B. and Virkkala S. (eds), Restructuring in old industrial towns in Finland, Vol. 6, pp. 1–13. University of Tampere, Tampere.
Wilson J.O., 1995: Rural Restructuring and Agriculture - Rural Economy Linkages: A New Zealand Study. J. Rural Studies 4: 417–431.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kiss, E. Rural restructuring in Hungary in the period of socio-economic transition. GeoJournal 51, 221–233 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017507328301
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017507328301